locked&loaded
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 3,609
- Reaction score
- 960
College production is not irrelevant. Mostert couldn't cut it as a full-time rb in college and he hasnt been able to in the pros either. I wonder if Mosterts weight had anything to do with it? hmmm. Conversely, Abanikanda was Pitts whole offense and at least proved he could potentially tote the rock full-time in the NFL.They are the exact same play style. Idk who you would compare him to, but Abanakinda and Mostert have the same exact strengths and weaknesses. Production in college is entirely irrelevant, and Tony Dorsett's record is even more irrelevant.
He could gain the extra .05 that makes him as fast as Mostert lol. But he gains nothing by being 220 instead of 205 because he's not a power back. He gets what is there, like you said. Weight allows you to get what isn't there.
I don't understand what you think Abanakinda is going to be that I'm not saying he is. Mostert is a good, dangerous player who has a pretty specific skillset and is every bit worth a pick in that 100-150 range. So is Abanakinda.
In that single game (the irrelevant one where abanikanda broke the record of one of the most talented backs to grace college and the nfl) abani almost amassed half the yards Mostert rushed for in 4 years in college.
Youre giving too much credit to Mostert and not enough to Abani, imo. Mostert wasnt a full-time rb in college and he isnt in the nfl, hes never been. Izzy was in college and he will get the opportunity to be one in the NFL, too. you are comparing a career role player to a likely starter just because they both are fast.
for the record, even brandon jacobs and Derrick henry dont run through 300lbers when they meet you in the hole.