Really torn who I like better-McDonald/Forbes

cnuball21

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,937
Reaction score
9,845
You would do a cartwheel for a McDonald and Brents 1st round/2nd round combo. This board would flip. :popcorn: :laugh: I bet Quinn would party.
I just looked and JuJu is 56th in the consensus big boards. Scouting reports reqs he’ll be highly coveted in a zone heavy scheme which fits us to a T.

Think he’d be a great pick in the 2nd.
 

CATCH17

1st Round Pick
Messages
67,671
Reaction score
86,223
Either would be good but Forbes would give us a lot of relief financially going forward.

If Diggs tries to set the CB market it could give us the option to trade him too.

Right now Diggs can ask Dallas for any number he wants and the Jones’s are always down to do a stupid deal for a solid player on our current roster.
 

Proof

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,129
Reaction score
14,637
They are my top two choices but I have come over to the dark side. I want Forbes. Forbes to me is Sauce Gardener with ball skills. McDonald is Randy Gregory without the weed issue. I like Sauce better then weed. :thumbup:
Giants gonna snag forbes right in front of us lol.
 

JBS

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,394
Reaction score
23,843
I’d be shocked if neither was there at 26. Much more likely both are there
 

visionary

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,477
Reaction score
33,451
I vote McDonald. All things being equal, Ill always favor the rusher. Plus we have two guys in Diggs and Bland that should be here long term. Pass rush depth gets very very thin after 2023
This without question
McDonald in a landslide
Most CBs are made or broken because of pressure
 

beware_d-ware

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,910
Reaction score
9,745
I don't think you're going to miss on either.

Will McDonald broke Iowa State's sack record twice while playing out of position, and Forbes owns the NCAA record for most career pick-sixes. Then they both lit up the Combine. They're total studs, and size is the only question you can hold against them.

Between the two, McDonald concerns me less, because we've seen Dan Quinn use 240, 250 lb speed rushers effectively a million times. Parsons is around that weight right now, and Randy Gregory was too. There's a key spot in Quinn's scheme for Will McDonald shaped athletes.

Forbes is a tougher sell, because Quinn likes big corners. He has the length Quinn covets, but it's weirdly matched to very literally the skinniest CB build ever. On Mock Draftable, Forbes has 70th percentile height, 92nd percentile wingspan, 78th percentile arm length, and 0th percentile weight. I don't even know how that's possible. Quinn usually likes his corners to be pushing 200 lbs, and Forbes weighed in at 166.

His ball hawking play style fits our defense, but is that weight going to be a dealbreaker for a coach who loves using thresholds to find CBs? It's at least a question I have. There's no doubts I have with McDonald.
 
Last edited:

Rayman70

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,458
Reaction score
34,363
Forbes is a project due to his weight and build. Will M is ready 2 go right now. Its fairly easy.
 

Rayman70

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,458
Reaction score
34,363
I think Will M. is already slightly ahead where Sam Williams was this time last year. I think Will is a bit more NFL ready.
 

cowboyec

Well-Known Member
Messages
34,807
Reaction score
41,591
i'd go with mcdonald.
you can never have enough of either...but i give the edge to the edge.
 

Rayman70

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,458
Reaction score
34,363
I dont think he is a project but i have Mcdonald ahead of him too.
his anticipation and ball skills are next level elite, but where he will struggle is tackling and shedding when he has to. He will need to learn all that and gain some weight.
 

AsthmaField

Outta bounds
Messages
26,489
Reaction score
44,544
I honestly like both players a lot.

I feel like Forbes, right now, can cover WR’s. Put him on the field, point to a guy and tell him “Don’t let that guy catch the ball” and he could do that. Forbes is such a natural cornerback… he already does a whole lot of what Quinn will want him to do in the secondary. It is a big reason that I like Forbes so much. His instincts for playing the position are just what you want.

That is what Forbes does… he harasses receivers at the catch point and, often, gets his hands on the ball. His length and speed really helps him do that. Being thin doesn’t hamper him much from being a pain in the *** for receivers.

McDonald, while also being a natural pass rusher, will probably need more work to consistently get through NFL tackles. I think he will contribute as a rookie, and he will be a good one… but he’s just not as pro ready as Forbes, IMO, who can cover like a Mo Fo.
 

xwalker

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,217
Reaction score
64,730
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Both players have strong college production, tested out as elite athletes, but lack NFL playing weight:

-13 sacks as a Junior playing out of position. He isn't like Sam Williams, where his learning curve shouldn't be as steep.
-14 interceptions, 6 pick six in the SEC, are you kidding me. Crazy ball production and team's avoided throwing the ball at him.

Yes, one is 240, the other is 170 lbs. In my opinion, both are future stars in this league and hoping one falls to 26.
I don't know the answer.

My gut feeling is that a player rated by the media as a top 20 type will drop to the Cowboys and they'll take that player regardless of position.

Both Forbes and McDonald are interesting in that they have larger wingspans than expected for "undersized" players.
- Forbes has a larger wingspan than 3 of the top 4 CBs.
- McDonald has the very long arms that Dan Quinn loves (34-7/8").

McDonald's weight (240) is not that far outside other early NFL draft picks at his position.
- Randy Gregory 235
- Micah Parson 246
- TJ Watt 252

Have there been any 1st/2nd round CBs that weighed 170 (166 at the combine) ?

Darrell Green's NFL listing is 5-9, 184.

Pacman 5'9-1/2", 187 (combine).

Nahshon Wright was only 183, despite being 6-4.
- He also has a smaller wingspan than Forbes (77-7/8 vs 79).
 

xwalker

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,217
Reaction score
64,730
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I honestly like both players a lot.

I feel like Forbes, right now, can cover WR’s. Put him on the field, point to a guy and tell him “Don’t let that guy catch the ball” and he could do that. Forbes is such a natural cornerback… he already does a whole lot of what Quinn will want him to do in the secondary. It is a big reason that I like Forbes so much. His instincts for playing the position are just what you want.

That is what Forbes does… he harasses receivers at the catch point and, often, gets his hands on the ball. His length and speed really helps him do that. Being thin doesn’t hamper him much from being a pain in the *** for receivers.

McDonald, while also being a natural pass rusher, will probably need more work to consistently get through NFL tackles. I think he will contribute as a rookie, and he will be a good one… but he’s just not as pro ready as Forbes, IMO, who can cover like a Mo Fo.
The more I watch Forbes, the more I like the player.
 
Top