Recap: Sean Salisbury breaks down the Playoffs

[JPM]

Good thing we don't have to worry about that, Salisbury. What was the point of bringing that up?

The fill up air time ? I don't know why he would bring it up.

 

[Maikeru-sama]

Let me clarify, Salisbury was being asked about which teams he thought could make some noise in the NFC and the AFC, not named Dallas or New England.

He felt Seattle, along with Tampa Bay was the team in the NFC who could give the "Big Boys" trouble. To further emphasize his point, he later stated that he felt that he wasn't sure if the Cowboys or Green Bay could win in Seattle.

 

[theebs]

Looks like Seattle is the flavor of the week, just two weeks removed from losing to Carolina.

They are complete dogs on the road.

Its funny how we get no credit for being a good team.

I am not sure if the producers do not allow them to actually say we are a good team or if they just overanalyze things.

I am guilty of overanalyzing things and feel like we can never win, but I know we are a good team...!!

 

[Doomsday101]

Let me clarify, Salisbury was being asked about which teams he thought could make some noise in the NFC and the AFC, not named Dallas or New England.

He felt Seattle, along with Tampa Bay was the team in the NFC who could give the "Big Boys" trouble. To further emphasize his point, he later stated that he felt that he wasn't sure if the Cowboys or Green Bay could win in Seattle.

I would agree with him except for the last part. As Jimmy said if you are a good team you can win in a cow paster or parking lot does not really matter.

 

[jterrell]

Seattle will not win a playoff game.

I'd say Jax and NYFG are the ones who could potentially get hot and score upsets.

 

[windward]

Seattle will not win a playoff game.

I'd say Jax and NYFG are the ones who could potentially get hot and score upsets.

I disagree. Whether they play the Skins, Vikes or Saints, Saettle's HFA gives them a win in the first round.

It will be the Giants, IMO that are knocked out by the Bucs.

 

[Doomsday101]

I disagree. Whether they play the Skins, Vikes or Saints, Saettle's HFA gives them a win in the first round.

It will be the Giants, IMO that are knocked out by the Bucs.

That is how I think it pan out as well with both the Seahawks and Buc winning their respective home games.

 

[Rampage]

Salisbury: I am not sure if Green Bay or Dallas could beat Seattle in Seattle

well guess what sean, their's no chance of the pack or Dallas playing seattle in seattle this post season.

 

[dalboy]

Golic: Tampa Bay. Garcia, tough defense and they can run the ball. Jon Gruden would love that they are not getting hyped.

Salisbury: Would't be a suprise if they upset the Cowboys.

Ascelius: I think Tampa could beat Green Bay in the cold

Salisbury: I am not sure if Green Bay or Dallas could beat Seattle in Seattle

he is the most hard-headed guy in the world(except of skip bayless)

 

[Bob Sacamano]

Salisbury: In the AFC, physical defense, a run game, a well coached team and a QB that doesn't make mistake. Jacksonville is set up for a championship.

I like Jacksonville alot

Salisbury: I am not sure if Green Bay or Dallas could beat Seattle in Seattle

well Sean, Seattle is going to be a road-team this playoffs

 

[Bob Sacamano]

when Rampage can point out an inconsistency, you know you ****ed up

j/k Ramp

 

[03EBZ06]

Let me clarify, Salisbury was being asked about which teams he thought could make some noise in the NFC and the AFC, not named Dallas or New England.

He felt Seattle, along with Tampa Bay was the team in the NFC who could give the "Big Boys" trouble. To further emphasize his point, he later stated that he felt that he wasn't sure if the Cowboys or Green Bay could win in Seattle.

Again, what relavancy does that last comment have with this years playoffs?

Absolutely none.

 

[AMERICAS_FAN]

Golic: Tampa Bay. Garcia, tough defense and they can run the ball. Jon Gruden would love that they are not getting hyped.

Salisbury: Would't be a suprise if they upset the Cowboys.

Ascelius: I think Tampa could beat Green Bay in the cold

Salisbury: I am not sure if Green Bay or Dallas could beat Seattle in Seattle

he is the most hard-headed guy in the world(except of skip bayless)

I'm shocked that none of these Bozos talked about how losing to Chicago was now the best thing to happen to Greem Bay because they're better suited to Beat the Cowboys in the warm Texas Stadium than in the cold Lambeau Field. That one was precious, right after everyone anointed GB as the home-field advantage favrite that nobody could beat - that is, until the Mighty Bears embaressed them. Please!

**

 

[Rampage]

when Rampage can point out an inconsistency, you know you ****ed up

j/k Ramp

:laugh2: no problem, Bob

 

[AmishCowboy]

That's what I was wondering. Did he forget that the Cowboys have home field advantage throughout their tenure in the playoffs??

I can't believe that Salisbury would say something that stupid.

 

[windward]

I'm shocked that none of these Bozos talked about how losing to Chicago was now the best thing to happen to Greem Bay because they're better suited to Beat the Cowboys in the warm Texas Stadium than in the cold Lambeau Field. That one was precious, right after everyone anointed GB as the home-field advantage favrite that nobody could beat - that is, until the Mighty Bears embaressed them. Please!

**

With all due respect Golic has spoken very favorably of the Cowboys this year. He's the on e I remember owning Skip Bayless in their "Who's the best in the NFC" debates

 

[dalboy]

With all due respect Golic has spoken very favorably of the Cowboys this year. He's the on e I remember owning Skip Bayless in their "Who's the best in the NFC" debates

I saw that and he was saying that we where going to lose to both carolina and washingon and the packers were going to be #1 because there was no way they were going to lose a game and the reason the cowboys won agaisnst the packers was because it was a fluke. well 35-7 skip what do you have to say now

 

[Maikeru-sama]

Again, what relavancy does that last comment have with this years playoffs?

Absolutely none.

Again, he obviously knows that Seattle is going to be a road team.

He was throwing out a hypothetical to underscore the point that he thinks Seattle is that good and could spoil the party for someone.

I don't know what else to say.

 

[Bob Sacamano]

Again, he obviously knows that Seattle is going to be a road team.

He was throwing out a hypothetical to underscore the point that he thinks Seattle is that good and could spoil the party for someone.

I don't know what else to say.

so since we're such a great road team, it would make sense to say that no way Dallas loses if they have to go on the road?

just admit it, that statement by Salisbury was useless information

 

[Maikeru-sama]

so since we're such a great road team, it would make sense to say that no way Dallas loses if they have to go on the road?

just admit it, that statement by Salisbury was useless information

And you would be absolutely warranted for making that claim.

Furthermore, I am not saying his statement was correct, I am just trying to put it in context and explain where he was coming from.

The man used a hypothetical, whether it was useless or not to further emphasize a point he made.

I am not going filter my Recaps just because a couple of posters don't like what somebody said, that is ridiculous.