Well if you do that we can say remember Lamb... everybody was saying we SHOULD take him. If we draft for need then we are stuck with K. Chaisson soooo lolAll the BPA guys were clamoring for Ruggs if he was there. "We have to take him"!!!!
What a huge mistake THAT would have been?
Although I freely admit that Pitts is a much better prospect overall than Ruggs was.
LmaoHe wasnt there....and the jury is still out on ruggs.
This thread is a head scratcher. Or maybe a butt scratcher? Something definitley stinks, though.
All the BPA guys were clamoring for Ruggs if he was there. "We have to take him"!!!!
What a huge mistake THAT would have been?
Although I freely admit that Pitts is a much better prospect overall than Ruggs was.
Well if you do that we can say remember Lamb... everybody was saying we SHOULD take him. If we draft for need then we are stuck with K. Chaisson soooo lol
Ruggs had speedAll the BPA guys were clamoring for Ruggs if he was there. "We have to take him"!!!!
What a huge mistake THAT would have been?
Although I freely admit that Pitts is a much better prospect overall than Ruggs was.
He wasnt there....and the jury is still out on ruggs.
This thread is a head scratcher. Or maybe a butt scratcher? Something definitley stinks, though.
That is not at all how I remember things. "All the BPA guys" certainly were screaming for Lamb. Beyond that, there wasn't any sort of consensus about who BPA was at 17.All the BPA guys were clamoring for Ruggs if he was there. "We have to take him"!!!!
What a huge mistake THAT would have been?
Although I freely admit that Pitts is a much better prospect overall than Ruggs was.
this thread would have caused us to doubt your mental capacity if we didnt already know you were happy Cowboys had to pay Dak 42 million/y
Alot of people hoping Brown or Kinlaw fellThat is not at all how I remember things. "All the BPA guys" certainly were screaming for Lamb. Beyond that, there wasn't any sort of consensus about who BPA was at 17.
Were talking about people clamoring to take him if he WAS there. Pre draft discussion. Like what we are doing now about Pitts. Which would have been a huge mistake.He wasnt there....and the jury is still out on ruggs.
This thread is a head scratcher. Or maybe a butt scratcher? Something definitley stinks, though.
That is not at all how I remember things. "All the BPA guys" certainly were screaming for Lamb. Beyond that, there wasn't any sort of consensus about who BPA was at 17.
So what? It's not like anything is going to change.
Before the jumping to conclusions happen: I clamored for nobody. I don't claim to be a Draft expert.