Results for Malcolm Kelly and Reggie Smith

TheCount;2029675 said:
No. No he won't.

And the Dolphins will never take Ted Ginn at #9.

The Bills will never draft Donte Whitner in the top 10.

Teams do crazy things to fill needs.

Devin Thomas is the clear #1 WR now.
 
BigDave95;2029681 said:
And the Dolphins will never take Ted Ginn at #9.

The Bills will never draft Donte Whitner in the top 10.

Teams do crazy things to fill needs.

Devin Thomas is the clear #1 WR now.


Thomas might get looks but no one should draft him top 10. There isn't a WR in the draft worthy of a top 20 pick IMO.

What a completely lame class of WRs
 
BigDave95;2029681 said:
And the Dolphins will never take Ted Ginn at #9.

The Bills will never draft Donte Whitner in the top 10.

Teams do crazy things to fill needs.

Devin Thomas is the clear #1 WR now.

No. No he's not.

And if you mean teams do stupid crap, then yeah, maybe some team will be moronic and take Devin Thomas as a top 10 pick.

Last year, Thomas (even giving him the benefit of what he did last season, since he did almost nothing the year before) would have been a late 2nd round to 3rd round pick. This year, all of a sudden, he's a top 15 prospect. Are you kidding me?
 
I think you could certainly make the argument that Devin Thomas is the top receiver in the draft, but I wouldn't take him before Hardy. Thomas simply has a bigger risk factor.
 
theogt;2029664 said:
Remember those people that thought the Bengals were looking at Kelly for the #9 spot?

Oh, the lulz.


Dude seriously Theo. Dont call me out in a thread. You have something to say to me personally then I suggest you take it to a PM.

They were looking at MK at that spot. It was on a few reports and on NFL network. I sat there and watched them discuss it.

Please dont be a JA all the time?

Now as far as MK having those numbers. Yes - this will seriously impact his draft and Reggies.

If you remember back to my post about Cincy, I said it would all be based on how he performed today.
 
No doubt these times for Kelly will drop him in the draft and right now that is what all of this is about positioning for the draft. 1 thing none of these test will tell you about a player is how he will perform at the next level. I still think Kelly will be a good player at the next level regardless of where he is drafted.
 
speedkilz88;2029717 said:
I can't remember a wr class this bad at the top.
I agree. I also can't remember a RB or CB class this deep ever.
 
theogt;2029664 said:
Remember those people that thought the Bengals were looking at Kelly for the #9 spot?

Oh, the lulz.

I've been on the anti-Malcom Kelly committee all off-season. Iglesias was a better WR for OU last year.
 
Dallas;2029718 said:
Dude seriously Theo. Dont call me out in a thread. You have something to say to me personally then I suggest you take it to a PM.

They were looking at MK at that spot. It was on a few reports and on NFL network. I sat there and watched them discuss it.

Please dont be a JA all the time?

Now as far as MK having those numbers. Yes - this will seriously impact his draft and Reggies.

If you remember back to my post about Cincy, I said it would all be based on how he performed today.
Wasn't really calling just you out. I've been down on Kelly for awhile now and have said he's too slow for awhile now. And, of course, I met a good bit of resistance on that from the people that just look at various online rankings.
 
theogt;2029784 said:
Wasn't really calling just you out. I've been down on Kelly for awhile now and have said he's too slow for awhile now. And, of course, I met a good bit of resistance on that from the people that just look at various online rankings.

Or perhaps they just have differing opinions?
 
EIH.

w00t (for purposes of getting enough characters)
 
Theogt has been tottally off base about the guy except for saying he is slow and honestly I think its a miracle he even ran that slow.

Im shocked at his 40 time but I think hes still going to be a good receiver for someone.

He just has to many natural WR abilities to not be good.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
465,477
Messages
13,877,756
Members
23,791
Latest member
mashburn
Back
Top