Hoofbite
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 40,907
- Reaction score
- 11,642
It's all relative - the activities/stunts done - plus the circumstances under which each was done.
Hoofbite - my post to Elgatogrande was more about humans have done outrageous things that pose a great danger to their lives -- throughout the annals of time.
Was not aware of Alex Honnold and his free solo technique. Obviously, he has the makeup physically and mental mentally to train thoroughly to perform that elite level of rock climbing.
But I listed a number of feats and stunts in the past that illustrate many, many poeple did that most of us word consider "just as crazy" as rock climbing.
At least 5,000 people have went over Niagra Falls since 1850 - by accident, intentionally= suicide, or as a stunt. Look up the first documented person to go over Nigagra Falls - and reply about that feat.
Of course it's all relative. In terms of relative risk. Is there great risk in fire-breathing or performing escape routines? Those are more gimmicks than feats. Houdini didn't die from an escape exhibition because escape artists are purely entertainment. He died from being repeatedly punched in the stomach, IIRC.
My point was, there's a vast difference between the risk of doing something that occurs over minutes versus doing something that occurs over hours without a safety net. Rock climbing (on a high level) is undoubtedly the craziest on that list, with or without a rope. Just my opinion.