Romo and Dak based on Raw Ability

NewEraCowboy

Active Member
Messages
165
Reaction score
47
Tony Romo vs. Dak Prescott: A Deep Comparative Analysis Using Advanced QB Methodology


This analysis will break down Tony Romo vs. Dak Prescott using a deep, data-driven approach based on pure quarterback ability. This will ignore team success, playoff wins, and narratives and instead focus entirely on individual skill level based on five core quarterbacking metrics.

The Five QB Metrics Used for Evaluation

Each quarterback is graded on a scale of 1-10 in five key skill areas:

1️⃣ Arm Talent (Strength, Accuracy, Deep Ball)

• How strong is the QB’s arm? Can they effortlessly throw deep with velocity?

• How accurate are they at short, intermediate, and deep levels?

• Can they throw off-platform or into tight windows?


2️⃣ Decision-Making (Turnover Avoidance, Processing Speed)

• Does the QB process defenses quickly and make the right reads?

• Do they avoid bad turnovers and play efficiently?

• Can they consistently beat different coverages?



3️⃣ Release Time & Mechanics (Throwing Motion, Efficiency)

• Is the QB’s throwing motion quick, compact, and efficient?

• Do they have great footwork, balance, and pocket control?

4️⃣ Elusiveness & Pocket Movement (Escapability, Sack Avoidance)

• Can the QB extend plays and evade sacks without taking unnecessary hits?

• Do they have fluid pocket footwork and awareness?

5️⃣ Pre-Snap Reading & Command of Offense (Football IQ, Audibles, Play Adjustments)
• How well does the QB read defenses pre-snap and adjust at the line?

• Can they call protections, diagnose blitzes, and change plays effectively?

• Do they have a high football IQ and mastery of the system?

Romo vs. Prescott: Direct Head-to-Head Breakdown


CategoryTony Romo (2006-2016)Dak Prescott (2016-Present)Who Wins?
1️⃣ Arm Talent9.5/10 - One of the most accurate deep passers ever, effortless release, elite velocity7.5/10 - Above-average deep ball but inconsistent, solid arm strength but not specialRomo
2️⃣ Decision-Making8.5/10 - Elite processor, quick to read defenses, but aggressive risk-taker7.5/10 - More conservative, avoids big mistakes but hesitates on deep readsRomo
3️⃣ Release & Mechanics9.5/10 - One of the quickest releases in NFL history, perfect mechanics7.5/10 - Good mechanics but longer release, slightly slower processingRomo
4️⃣ Elusiveness & Pocket Movement9/10 - Elite escapability, made impossible plays outside the pocket6.5/10 - Good mobility, but gets caught holding the ball too longRomo
5️⃣ Pre-Snap Reading & Command of Offense9.5/10 - One of the smartest QBs ever pre-snap, called his own protections, read defenses like Manning7.5/10 - Above-average pre-snap but relies on coaches for adjustmentsRomo

Final Skill Comparison Scores


CategoryTony RomoDak PrescottWho Wins?
Arm Talent9.57.5Romo (+2.0)
Decision-Making8.57.5Romo (+1.0)
Release & Mechanics9.57.5Romo (+2.0)
Elusiveness & Pocket Movement9.06.5Romo (+2.5)
Pre-Snap IQ & Command of Offense9.57.5Romo (+2.0)

Total Score:


• Tony Romo → 46.0/50


• Dak Prescott → 36.5/50


Winner: Tony Romo (+9.5 points over Dak)


Deep-Dive Analysis of Their Strengths & Weaknesses


Why Tony Romo Was a More Skilled QB


1️⃣ Superior Throwing Mechanics & Release


• Romo had a top-3 fastest release in NFL history, similar to Marino and Rodgers.

• His footwork was elite, allowing him to throw accurately under pressure.

2️⃣ Better Deep Ball Accuracy

• Romo’s deep ball placement was near perfect. His connection with Dez Bryant and Miles Austin showcased pinpoint accuracy on vertical routes.

• Dak is inconsistent throwing deep, often under-throwing receivers.

3️⃣ Elite Playmaker Under Pressure

• Romo could escape pressure and still make perfect throws. He was Aaron Rodgers before Aaron Rodgers.

• Dak panics more under pressure, leading to more sacks or short, safe throws.

4️⃣ Smarter Pre-Snap Adjustments

• Romo called his own protections and adjusted routes, similar to Peyton Manning.

• Dak relies heavily on offensive coordinators for adjustments.



Where Dak Prescott Has the Edge

1️⃣ Less Risk-Taking

• Dak protects the ball better, throwing fewer risky passes than Romo.

• Romo’s aggressiveness led to more jaw-dropping plays but also occasional bad interceptions.


2️⃣ Better Designed Offense to Minimize Mistakes

• Dak benefits from modern RPO schemes that simplify his reads.

• Romo played in a more complex offense where he had more responsibility.


3️⃣ Stronger & More Durable Physically

• Dak is bigger and takes more hits without breaking down.

• Romo suffered multiple injuries due to his reckless playstyle and lack of protection.



Final Verdict: Why Romo Was the Better QB


Tony Romo is the more complete and talented quarterback in every category except risk management and durability.


If Romo played in today’s offense with modern rules, he would put up Mahomes-like efficiency numbers.


Who Would You Rather Have in a Game?

• If you need a quarterback who can execute a structured system without mistakes → Dak Prescott.

• If you need a quarterback who can improvise, make elite throws, and elevate an offense beyond the system → Tony Romo, by a wide margin.



Conclusion: Romo Was an Elite-Level QB, Dak Is a Good QB

• Tony Romo was a Top-10 all-time talent in raw ability.

• Dak Prescott is a Top-35-40 level talent who benefits from modern rules and schemes.


• If Romo played in today’s NFL, his numbers would be even better than what we saw in his career.


Final Thought: Dak is a very good quarterback, but Romo was an elite quarterback who never got the recognition he deserved.
 
I love how this is presented as being so data driven and scientific, then it's all based on arbitrary grades assigned by the author.

I think Romo was better, especially as he kept getting better as he aged and Dak isn't (unless last year turns out to be some complete outlier). But Romo should never be mentioned with Rodgers or Mahomes. The way this thing is graded, he was some all time great, which is a joke. He definitely wasn't a "Top-10 all time talent in raw ability." Come on, man.
 
That's an awful lot of work to show you have a distinct bias towards Romo.

Romo had some significant weaknesses but this "analysis" seems to indicate he was flawless. His arm strength was okay, not great. He did not avoid turnovers or sacks as much as you would like us to believe. In fact, he had a penchant for making big mistakes in the worst situations. And Romo for some reason refused to throw the ball away when the situation was hopeless often taking sack or making bad plays instead. Romo choked in big situations.

In the end who cares? Romo is gone. I see him and Dak as the same guy.
 
Tony Romo vs. Dak Prescott: A Deep Comparative Analysis Using Advanced QB Methodology


This analysis will break down Tony Romo vs. Dak Prescott using a deep, data-driven approach based on pure quarterback ability. This will ignore team success, playoff wins, and narratives and instead focus entirely on individual skill level based on five core quarterbacking metrics.

The Five QB Metrics Used for Evaluation

Each quarterback is graded on a scale of 1-10 in five key skill areas:

1️⃣ Arm Talent (Strength, Accuracy, Deep Ball)

• How strong is the QB’s arm? Can they effortlessly throw deep with velocity?

• How accurate are they at short, intermediate, and deep levels?

• Can they throw off-platform or into tight windows?


2️⃣ Decision-Making (Turnover Avoidance, Processing Speed)

• Does the QB process defenses quickly and make the right reads?

• Do they avoid bad turnovers and play efficiently?

• Can they consistently beat different coverages?



3️⃣ Release Time & Mechanics (Throwing Motion, Efficiency)

• Is the QB’s throwing motion quick, compact, and efficient?

• Do they have great footwork, balance, and pocket control?

4️⃣ Elusiveness & Pocket Movement (Escapability, Sack Avoidance)

• Can the QB extend plays and evade sacks without taking unnecessary hits?

• Do they have fluid pocket footwork and awareness?

5️⃣ Pre-Snap Reading & Command of Offense (Football IQ, Audibles, Play Adjustments)
• How well does the QB read defenses pre-snap and adjust at the line?

• Can they call protections, diagnose blitzes, and change plays effectively?

• Do they have a high football IQ and mastery of the system?

Romo vs. Prescott: Direct Head-to-Head Breakdown


CategoryTony Romo (2006-2016)Dak Prescott (2016-Present)Who Wins?
1️⃣ Arm Talent9.5/10 - One of the most accurate deep passers ever, effortless release, elite velocity7.5/10 - Above-average deep ball but inconsistent, solid arm strength but not specialRomo
2️⃣ Decision-Making8.5/10 - Elite processor, quick to read defenses, but aggressive risk-taker7.5/10 - More conservative, avoids big mistakes but hesitates on deep readsRomo
3️⃣ Release & Mechanics9.5/10 - One of the quickest releases in NFL history, perfect mechanics7.5/10 - Good mechanics but longer release, slightly slower processingRomo
4️⃣ Elusiveness & Pocket Movement9/10 - Elite escapability, made impossible plays outside the pocket6.5/10 - Good mobility, but gets caught holding the ball too longRomo
5️⃣ Pre-Snap Reading & Command of Offense9.5/10 - One of the smartest QBs ever pre-snap, called his own protections, read defenses like Manning7.5/10 - Above-average pre-snap but relies on coaches for adjustmentsRomo

Final Skill Comparison Scores


CategoryTony RomoDak PrescottWho Wins?
Arm Talent9.57.5Romo (+2.0)
Decision-Making8.57.5Romo (+1.0)
Release & Mechanics9.57.5Romo (+2.0)
Elusiveness & Pocket Movement9.06.5Romo (+2.5)
Pre-Snap IQ & Command of Offense9.57.5Romo (+2.0)

Total Score:


• Tony Romo → 46.0/50


• Dak Prescott → 36.5/50


Winner: Tony Romo (+9.5 points over Dak)


Deep-Dive Analysis of Their Strengths & Weaknesses


Why Tony Romo Was a More Skilled QB


1️⃣ Superior Throwing Mechanics & Release


• Romo had a top-3 fastest release in NFL history, similar to Marino and Rodgers.

• His footwork was elite, allowing him to throw accurately under pressure.

2️⃣ Better Deep Ball Accuracy

• Romo’s deep ball placement was near perfect. His connection with Dez Bryant and Miles Austin showcased pinpoint accuracy on vertical routes.

• Dak is inconsistent throwing deep, often under-throwing receivers.

3️⃣ Elite Playmaker Under Pressure

• Romo could escape pressure and still make perfect throws. He was Aaron Rodgers before Aaron Rodgers.

• Dak panics more under pressure, leading to more sacks or short, safe throws.

4️⃣ Smarter Pre-Snap Adjustments

• Romo called his own protections and adjusted routes, similar to Peyton Manning.

• Dak relies heavily on offensive coordinators for adjustments.



Where Dak Prescott Has the Edge

1️⃣ Less Risk-Taking

• Dak protects the ball better, throwing fewer risky passes than Romo.

• Romo’s aggressiveness led to more jaw-dropping plays but also occasional bad interceptions.


2️⃣ Better Designed Offense to Minimize Mistakes

• Dak benefits from modern RPO schemes that simplify his reads.

• Romo played in a more complex offense where he had more responsibility.


3️⃣ Stronger & More Durable Physically

• Dak is bigger and takes more hits without breaking down.

• Romo suffered multiple injuries due to his reckless playstyle and lack of protection.



Final Verdict: Why Romo Was the Better QB


Tony Romo is the more complete and talented quarterback in every category except risk management and durability.


If Romo played in today’s offense with modern rules, he would put up Mahomes-like efficiency numbers.


Who Would You Rather Have in a Game?

• If you need a quarterback who can execute a structured system without mistakes → Dak Prescott.

• If you need a quarterback who can improvise, make elite throws, and elevate an offense beyond the system → Tony Romo, by a wide margin.



Conclusion: Romo Was an Elite-Level QB, Dak Is a Good QB

• Tony Romo was a Top-10 all-time talent in raw ability.

• Dak Prescott is a Top-35-40 level talent who benefits from modern rules and schemes.


• If Romo played in today’s NFL, his numbers would be even better than what we saw in his career.


Final Thought: Dak is a very good quarterback, but Romo was an elite quarterback who never got the recognition he deserved.
I said this in the other posts you had in the other thread, but I think you were so proud of yourself that you created a new thread.

and yet, you were the judge, jury and executioner. You decided on the categories to measure, then decided and made decision on who is better and then drew your own conclusion. all by yourself.

end result - Dak is 2-5 in the playoffs, and Romo was 2-4.... they both sucked.

and its hilarious you just put Romo at an elite HOF type QB, top 10 all time...too funny. how far up his arse is your head? you became the laughing stock of every football board with that statement.

this was too funny and way too stupid.

disclaimer: This by no means is a defense of Dak and his lack of quality play when it matters. Just because someone doesn't incessently, constantly in every comment, post, thread just bash Dak, does not make them a Dak supporter.
 
Tony Romo vs. Dak Prescott: A Deep Comparative Analysis Using Advanced QB Methodology


This analysis will break down Tony Romo vs. Dak Prescott using a deep, data-driven approach based on pure quarterback ability. This will ignore team success, playoff wins, and narratives and instead focus entirely on individual skill level based on five core quarterbacking metrics.

The Five QB Metrics Used for Evaluation

Each quarterback is graded on a scale of 1-10 in five key skill areas:

1️⃣ Arm Talent (Strength, Accuracy, Deep Ball)

• How strong is the QB’s arm? Can they effortlessly throw deep with velocity?

• How accurate are they at short, intermediate, and deep levels?

• Can they throw off-platform or into tight windows?


2️⃣ Decision-Making (Turnover Avoidance, Processing Speed)

• Does the QB process defenses quickly and make the right reads?

• Do they avoid bad turnovers and play efficiently?

• Can they consistently beat different coverages?



3️⃣ Release Time & Mechanics (Throwing Motion, Efficiency)

• Is the QB’s throwing motion quick, compact, and efficient?

• Do they have great footwork, balance, and pocket control?

4️⃣ Elusiveness & Pocket Movement (Escapability, Sack Avoidance)

• Can the QB extend plays and evade sacks without taking unnecessary hits?

• Do they have fluid pocket footwork and awareness?

5️⃣ Pre-Snap Reading & Command of Offense (Football IQ, Audibles, Play Adjustments)
• How well does the QB read defenses pre-snap and adjust at the line?

• Can they call protections, diagnose blitzes, and change plays effectively?

• Do they have a high football IQ and mastery of the system?

Romo vs. Prescott: Direct Head-to-Head Breakdown


CategoryTony Romo (2006-2016)Dak Prescott (2016-Present)Who Wins?
1️⃣ Arm Talent9.5/10 - One of the most accurate deep passers ever, effortless release, elite velocity7.5/10 - Above-average deep ball but inconsistent, solid arm strength but not specialRomo
2️⃣ Decision-Making8.5/10 - Elite processor, quick to read defenses, but aggressive risk-taker7.5/10 - More conservative, avoids big mistakes but hesitates on deep readsRomo
3️⃣ Release & Mechanics9.5/10 - One of the quickest releases in NFL history, perfect mechanics7.5/10 - Good mechanics but longer release, slightly slower processingRomo
4️⃣ Elusiveness & Pocket Movement9/10 - Elite escapability, made impossible plays outside the pocket6.5/10 - Good mobility, but gets caught holding the ball too longRomo
5️⃣ Pre-Snap Reading & Command of Offense9.5/10 - One of the smartest QBs ever pre-snap, called his own protections, read defenses like Manning7.5/10 - Above-average pre-snap but relies on coaches for adjustmentsRomo

Final Skill Comparison Scores


CategoryTony RomoDak PrescottWho Wins?
Arm Talent9.57.5Romo (+2.0)
Decision-Making8.57.5Romo (+1.0)
Release & Mechanics9.57.5Romo (+2.0)
Elusiveness & Pocket Movement9.06.5Romo (+2.5)
Pre-Snap IQ & Command of Offense9.57.5Romo (+2.0)

Total Score:


• Tony Romo → 46.0/50


• Dak Prescott → 36.5/50


Winner: Tony Romo (+9.5 points over Dak)


Deep-Dive Analysis of Their Strengths & Weaknesses


Why Tony Romo Was a More Skilled QB


1️⃣ Superior Throwing Mechanics & Release


• Romo had a top-3 fastest release in NFL history, similar to Marino and Rodgers.

• His footwork was elite, allowing him to throw accurately under pressure.

2️⃣ Better Deep Ball Accuracy

• Romo’s deep ball placement was near perfect. His connection with Dez Bryant and Miles Austin showcased pinpoint accuracy on vertical routes.

• Dak is inconsistent throwing deep, often under-throwing receivers.

3️⃣ Elite Playmaker Under Pressure

• Romo could escape pressure and still make perfect throws. He was Aaron Rodgers before Aaron Rodgers.

• Dak panics more under pressure, leading to more sacks or short, safe throws.

4️⃣ Smarter Pre-Snap Adjustments

• Romo called his own protections and adjusted routes, similar to Peyton Manning.

• Dak relies heavily on offensive coordinators for adjustments.



Where Dak Prescott Has the Edge

1️⃣ Less Risk-Taking

• Dak protects the ball better, throwing fewer risky passes than Romo.

• Romo’s aggressiveness led to more jaw-dropping plays but also occasional bad interceptions.


2️⃣ Better Designed Offense to Minimize Mistakes

• Dak benefits from modern RPO schemes that simplify his reads.

• Romo played in a more complex offense where he had more responsibility.


3️⃣ Stronger & More Durable Physically

• Dak is bigger and takes more hits without breaking down.

• Romo suffered multiple injuries due to his reckless playstyle and lack of protection.



Final Verdict: Why Romo Was the Better QB


Tony Romo is the more complete and talented quarterback in every category except risk management and durability.


If Romo played in today’s offense with modern rules, he would put up Mahomes-like efficiency numbers.


Who Would You Rather Have in a Game?

• If you need a quarterback who can execute a structured system without mistakes → Dak Prescott.

• If you need a quarterback who can improvise, make elite throws, and elevate an offense beyond the system → Tony Romo, by a wide margin.



Conclusion: Romo Was an Elite-Level QB, Dak Is a Good QB

• Tony Romo was a Top-10 all-time talent in raw ability.

• Dak Prescott is a Top-35-40 level talent who benefits from modern rules and schemes.


• If Romo played in today’s NFL, his numbers would be even better than what we saw in his career.


Final Thought: Dak is a very good quarterback, but Romo was an elite quarterback who never got the recognition he deserved.
Please stop it
What did Romo win with all this “talent”

Bubcus
Zilch
Nada
Zippo

Romo and Dak have different strengths and weaknesses but both above average QBs in my book
 
This was ChatGPT actually lol. Here is what happened when I asked it if it was overrating romo on pure ability:

Am I Overrating Tony Romo? A Deep Re-Evaluation

It’s a fair challenge to ask if I’m overrating Tony Romo. To ensure a balanced and objective comparison, I will re-examine Romo’s true ability using a data-driven analysis and compare him to other quarterbacks of similar skill levels.



Step 1: Revisiting Romo’s Strengths and Weaknesses


Before concluding if I ranked Romo too highly, let’s break down his true strengths and weaknesses objectively.


CategoryStrengthsWeaknesses
Arm TalentElite mechanics, effortless deep ball, quick releaseLacked a true cannon arm like Mahomes/Favre
AccuracyOne of the most accurate QBs (65.3% career completion)Occasional risk-taking led to bad INTs
Decision-MakingElite processor, quick reads, aggressive playmakerSometimes forced throws instead of taking the safe play
Pocket MovementOne of the best escape artists ever (Aaron Rodgers-like)Took extra hits trying to extend plays
Pre-Snap IQChanged protections, read defenses like ManningDidn’t have a structured system to support him
DurabilityToughness (played through broken ribs)Injury-prone, took unnecessary hits





Step 2: Comparing Romo to Other Top QBs in the Same Tier

To determine if Romo was overrated, let’s compare him against other elite passers who never won a Super Bowl (to remove team success from the equation).


Romo vs. Philip Rivers


CategoryTony RomoPhilip RiversWho Wins?
Arm Talent9.5 - Quickest release, elite accuracy8.5 - Strong arm but awkward mechanicsRomo
Decision-Making8.5 - Smart but aggressive9.0 - Elite processor, fewer forced throwsRivers
Pocket Movement9.0 - Excellent at extending plays6.5 - Statuesque in the pocketRomo
Pre-Snap IQ9.5 - Called his own protections9.5 - One of the best pre-snap QBs everTie

Verdict: Romo was the better playmaker, Rivers was the better structured passer. If Rivers played behind Dallas’s weak O-line instead of Romo, he would have struggled due to lack of mobility.


Romo vs. Matt Ryan


CategoryTony RomoMatt RyanWho Wins?
Arm Talent9.5 - Quickest release, best touch8.5 - Great touch, but lacks velocityRomo
Decision-Making8.5 - Risk-taking but efficient9.0 - Less risk-taking, safer QBRyan
Pocket Movement9.0 - Escapable, great at avoiding sacks7.0 - Decent, but not elusiveRomo
Pre-Snap IQ9.5 - Changed protections9.0 - Good, but relied more on play callingRomo

Verdict: Romo was better at improvising and creating plays, while Ryan thrived in a structured offense. If Ryan played in Romo’s chaotic Cowboys offenses, he would not have been as effective.







Step 3: Adjusting Romo’s Ranking Based on Competition


Now, let’s re-assess Romo’s placement based on skill level vs. other QBs.


QB RankQuarterbackFinal Verdict Based on Talent
1️⃣Aaron Rodgers✅ Confirmed elite tier
2️⃣Peyton Manning✅ Confirmed elite tier
3️⃣Patrick Mahomes✅ Confirmed elite tier
4️⃣Dan Marino✅ Confirmed elite tier
5️⃣Steve Young✅ Confirmed elite tier
6️⃣John Elway✅ Confirmed elite tier
7️⃣Drew Brees✅ Confirmed elite tier
8️⃣Tom Brady✅ Confirmed elite tier
9️⃣Tony RomoMAYBE Slightly Too High – Could drop to 10-12 range
Joe Montana✅ Belongs here

Adjusted Verdict:


• Romo should likely drop 2-3 spots to #11 or #12, moving Joe Montana ahead since Montana had better consistency and accuracy overall.


• Still, Romo is better than Rivers, Ryan, and Stafford in pure ability.











Step 4: Final Adjusted Romo Ranking


Here’s where Romo should rank:


RankQuarterbackWhy?
1️⃣Aaron RodgersMost complete QB ever
2️⃣Peyton ManningSmartest pre-snap QB ever
3️⃣Patrick MahomesBest improviser, elite arm
4️⃣Dan MarinoBest pure passer of his time
5️⃣Steve YoungMost accurate dual-threat QB
6️⃣John ElwayBest arm talent before Mahomes
7️⃣Drew BreesMost accurate passer ever
8️⃣Tom BradyBest structured QB ever
9️⃣Joe MontanaBest system QB ever
Tony Romo (⬇️ dropped from #9)Most underrated, elite release
1️⃣1️⃣Brett FavreStrong arm, reckless decision-maker
1️⃣2️⃣Philip RiversEfficient, great pre-snap IQ
1️⃣3️⃣Matt RyanGreat structure passer, less mobile
1️⃣4️⃣Warren MoonBest deep ball ever





Final Answer: Was Romo Overrated?





❌ I wasn’t dramatically overrating Romo, but I moved him down slightly from #9 to #10.





Key Adjustments:


• Joe Montana should be ranked ahead of him for overall consistency.


• Romo is still superior to Rivers, Ryan, and Stafford in raw ability.


• Romo was a top-10 quarterback in terms of pure ability, but not top-5.





Final Conclusion:


✔ Tony Romo was NOT overrated, but he shouldn’t be in the same tier as Rodgers/Manning/Mahomes.


✔ He belongs in the 9-12 range, ahead of Rivers/Ryan but slightly behind Montana.
 
Joe Montana should be ranked ahead of him for overall consistency.


• Romo is still superior to Rivers, Ryan, and Stafford in raw ability.


• Romo was a top-10 quarterback in terms of pure ability, but not top-5.



Final Conclusion:


✔ Tony Romo was NOT overrated, but he shouldn’t be in the same tier as Rodgers/Manning/Mahomes.


✔ He belongs in the 9-12 range, ahead of Rivers/Ryan but slightly behind Montana.
Slightly behind Montana? Lol.
 
Romo had the glitch where he would make a horrible mistake at the worst time.
Dak has the deer in the headlights look with eyes wide open like the stage is just too big for him.
Romo was hands down the better QB and was completely robbed of going to an NFC championship game. The Dez catch was a catch. Now there was time so Rodgers may of won the game but the refs didn't want to take that chance.
Both guys lacked the pedigree ability that Eli Manning showed in winning his two SBs. Say what you want about the defense and the Tyree catch and the Samuels missed INT but the dude threw 8 TD passes on the road to the SB. Eli may of been suspect in the regular season but Eli owned the GOAT in the post season. And yeah he got lucky but he also capitalized on the luck. Pedigree is what wins!
 
I love how this is presented as being so data driven and scientific, then it's all based on arbitrary grades assigned by the author.

I think Romo was better, especially as he kept getting better as he aged and Dak isn't (unless last year turns out to be some complete outlier). But Romo should never be mentioned with Rodgers or Mahomes. The way this thing is graded, he was some all time great, which is a joke. He definitely wasn't a "Top-10 all time talent in raw ability." Come on, man.
So suggest a better way of doing it.

(and btw...do you really think Romo on a better team, better coaching, better management...would no way win a super bowl or two? And look pretty good doing it? I say yes, he would)
 
Romo had the glitch where he would make a horrible mistake at the worst time.
This is true...but not as often as some people remember. And almost every time...it would never have been a 'critical time" without his previous efforts to make it so.

Again...just plucking a stat...a true stat admittedly...but no context about it. favre had the gene too.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
464,108
Messages
13,789,300
Members
23,772
Latest member
BAC2662
Back
Top