Romo and DMac prove there is no such thing as team chemistry

We wouldnt had been in that position if Romo didnt crap the bed, once again, against the Matt Flynn led Packers. Classic Romo in the 4th quarter, indeed!

So you admit that you only want to talk about the instances that were in the vast minority, instead of the overwhelming times he won ballgames for us.

Okay, got it. If you want to sit here all night and go back and forth, you'll run out of examples way quicker than I will.

You ain't nothing but a Romo hater that doesn't know what he's talking about.
 
He was injured for 2 of those games and you were the one that mentioned full seasons, not me.
Show me where I said FULL season. You should learn to comprehend when you read.

Come on, what was Romo stats last season. He wasn't injuried week 1 against the Giants....stop being bias and answer the question. If not then go on and end the conversation because your love for Romo won't allow you to have a rational debate
 
Because sooner or later, he'll screw up the playoffs, it's always happened through out his career. You know, when teams game-plan you. But, he looked good enough to get us a #1 draft pick.

Hey, I rather have Dak, but as far as experience goes I think Romo would be better for the playoffs
 
Yep, Romo has been on some pretty lackluster teams throughout his career. Without him the past 10 years and we are no better than a 500 team. At this point Romo definitely would make us a more wide open offense, but Dak is in control and we will see how it all plays out soon enough.
Dak is playing great. This doesn't better QB yet. But to compare him On this team to what Romo has suffered for years from Parcells leaving to Wade Phillips to coach in training in Garrett while the team went from being built up to tore down to built up again is just asinine. My guess is Dak would have suffered just as much if he was on similar teams and the same people who are so anti-Romo would be anti-Dak. Romo elevated his team's play just like Dak did in college with less than top tier talent. But both as individuals can only do so much with at least ten other players on offense and at least eleven other players on defense.
 
Show me where I said FULL season. You should learn to comprehend when you read.

Come on, what was Romo stats last season. He wasn't injuried week 1 against the Giants....stop being bias and answer the question. If not then go on and end the conversation because your love for Romo won't allow you to have a rational debate

So a rational debate?

You insinuate that Romo is turnover prone. The numbers proved that you were horribly wrong.

And you said that Dak threw 4 interceptions all season. So I guess in your world all season doesn't equate to a full season? You are right. Maybe I shouldn't assume that all season is a full season. Nevermind that when everybody else says that they mean that it is indeed a full season....LOL.

And I've already given you Romo's career TD/INT ratio along with his playoff numbers, which you obviously had no clue about.

So now you are down to last season in which he played in four games, not even four games. Two of which he was injured. LOL if that's all you've got then it's embarrassing, well aside from the fact that you have no idea what a turnover prone QB is.
 
Dak is playing great. This doesn't mean he's the better QB yet. But to compare him to what Romo has suffered for years from Parcells leaving to Wade Phillips to coach in training in Garrett while the team went from being built up to tore down to built up again is just asinine. My guess is Dak would have suffered just as much if he was on similar teams and the same people who are so anti-Romo would be anti-Dak. Romo elevated his team's play just like Dak did in college with less than top tier talent. But both as individuals can only do so much with at least ten other players on offense and at least eleven other players on defense.
But that's all speculating who would do what with what team. All we can do is go by what happens....the facts and that's it. Ifs and buts don't do anything
 
The team isn't as explosive with McFadden as it is with Zeke. The same can be said about Dunbar and Morris. We are a different team with Zeke and Dak. Romo looked good no doubt in the one drive but who thinks he plays like that the entire game? I don't. Sure Romo and McFadden came in and we scored but we are much better with Dak and Zeke

I think that's impossible to say, either way, based on one series.
 
So a rational debate?

You insinuate that Romo is turnover prone. The numbers proved that you were horribly wrong.

And you said that Dak threw 4 interceptions all season. So I guess in your world all season doesn't equate to a full season? You are right. Maybe I shouldn't assume that all season is a full season. Nevermind that when everybody else says that they mean that it is indeed a full season....LOL.

And I've already given you Romo's career TD/INT ratio along with his playoff numbers, which you obviously had no clue about.

So now you are down to last season in which he played in four games, not even four games. Two of which he was injured. LOL if that's all you've got then it's embarrassing, well aside from the fact that you have no idea what a turnover prone QB is.
So you're still dancing the question. Since your brain can't grab the concept I will help you.

Dak played more games this season and had how many interceptions?

Romo only played in 4 games last season and had how many interceptions?

You following or need more help? My 5 year old is available to help you
 
But that's all speculating who would do what with what team. All we can do is go by what happens....the facts and that's it. Ifs and buts don't do anything
No, it's not just speculating. It's putting into context other factors that likely have negatively contributed to the lack of success of the teams that Romo was a part of.
 
Total waste of time

I know man.

The only fan I have ever encountered who believes a QB is solely responsible for winning a SB by themselves - and I have the former posts where he said it.

I'm going to let it go for now on.
 
No, it's not just speculating. It's putting into context other factors that likely have negatively contributed to the lack of success of the teams that Romo was a part of.
Its speculating no matter how you slice it.

If I told you before the season started Dak would lead this team to 11 straight wins and 13-2 record........what would you have said
 
Dak has been tremendous this season. Why can't we be excited about this? The apex of Romo's career was 2007 where we won 13 games.. looked horrific down the stretch (unlike Dak in his last two full games) and we choked away the divisional round. We have a chance to EXCEED that this year. Shouldn't we all be excited?
 
So you're still dancing the question. Since your brain can't grab the concept I will help you.

Dak played more games this season and had how many interceptions?

Romo only played in 4 games last season and had how many interceptions?

You following or need more help? My 5 year old is available to help you

You might want to bring him in because you're getting absolutely rekt.
 
I know man.

The only fan I have ever encountered who believes a QB is solely responsible for winning a SB by themselves - and I have the former posts where he said it.

I'm going to let it go for now on.
I know you ain't talking about me saying a QB is solely responsible for winning a SB. I want to see these former post if so
 
Dak has been tremendous this season. Why can't we be excited about this? The apex of Romo's career was 2007 where we won 13 games.. looked horrific down the stretch (unlike Dak in his last two full games) and we choked away the divisional round. We have a chance to EXCEED that this year. Shouldn't we all be excited?
What happened in 2007 was TO, Dallas' best offensive weapon got hurt and was severely limited. If Zeke got hurt and played no better than Alfred Morris against a team that could beat the best regular season team of all time, I don't think that this year's Dallas would win either.
 
What happened in 2007 was TO, Dallas' best offensive weapon got hurt and was severely limited. If Zeke got hurt and played no better than Alfred Morris against a team that could beat the best regular season team of all time, I don't think that this year's Dallas would win either.

I actually forgot about this. I seem to remember TO getting hurt while with philly during their playoff run.
 
Back
Top