Romo has had over 247 career passing touchdowns

Romonater

Well-Known Member
Messages
655
Reaction score
2,087
and some of you want to get rid of him for a rookie who yet to throw one? I know you're done with the Dak threads, but I am ecstatic about the future. I believe Dak will be the future for this franchise. However, there's a reason why we can't run the ball, and it's because the threat of the long pass with Romo isn't there. When Romo gets back, our offense and our running game is going to be special. Romo is the better quarterback right now if he's upright. If he's not healthy, we roll with Dak and i'm fine with that. I don't even care if Dak wins us 3 more games. I am for making this team better. This team is better with Tony Romo as the quarterback. Plus, it will give Dak an opportunity to see and study Romo, learn from Romo's successes and failures. The book on number 9 isn't over yet, and we shouldn't rush to judgement, either. We have a chance to contend for a championship with Romo, not with Dak. In a couple of years, yes. Now is simply not his time.
 
This thread will be tough for Romo hating halfwits to understand. That whole Logic and Reasoning thing isn't going to work on them.
 
And 2 playoff wins. Yay. Next.
You just applied the tennis and golf filter to yourself.
Careful with that or people will assume you know absolutely nothing about real football...for good reason.

Since I haven't read many of your posts, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you were just getting in a random zinger.
 
There were some that wanted to get rid of Romo before we even had a good QB prospect behind him.
 
It's a good thing there were no other Romo/Dak threads you could have added this thought to. Nope, we definitely needed a new one.
No joke. It is getting tiresome.

There is no, and will not and maybe should not be a QB controversy when Romo returns.

This is an argument best shelved until next offseason.
 
There were some that wanted to get rid of Romo before we even had a good QB prospect behind him.
And that is fine and dandy. Does not mean it is any better to cry victim now.

The lunatic fringe got a little bigger. So what.
 
That's a lot of td passes. He sure earned his here in dallas. Really wish him a SB. Even if he doesn't he still will be one of the dallas greats in my book. Come to think of it without missing last year and combine this year I'm sure he would of been at 300.
 
Last edited:
And that is fine and dandy. Does not mean it is any better to cry victim now.

The lunatic fringe got a little bigger. So what.

It took a lunatic Fanbase to want to get rid of Romo when we had nothing behind him. It makes a lot more sense now wanting to get rid of him with his age, injuries and having a young QB prospect showing promise as the starter.
 
and some of you want to get rid of him for a rookie who yet to throw one? I know you're done with the Dak threads, but I am ecstatic about the future. I believe Dak will be the future for this franchise. However, there's a reason why we can't run the ball, and it's because the threat of the long pass with Romo isn't there. When Romo gets back, our offense and our running game is going to be special. Romo is the better quarterback right now if he's upright. If he's not healthy, we roll with Dak and i'm fine with that. I don't even care if Dak wins us 3 more games. I am for making this team better. This team is better with Tony Romo as the quarterback. Plus, it will give Dak an opportunity to see and study Romo, learn from Romo's successes and failures. The book on number 9 isn't over yet, and we shouldn't rush to judgement, either. We have a chance to contend for a championship with Romo, not with Dak. In a couple of years, yes. Now is simply not his time.
sounds like someone listened to the Deep Throat Informant on The Ticket yesterday morning....
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,003
Messages
14,505,691
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top