Romo or JC, who throws more TD's this year?

5Stars

Here comes the Sun...
Messages
37,846
Reaction score
16,869
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Sammy Baugh;2887043 said:
Actually the football professionals in the organization support Campbell. The reason we reached out for another qb is because we have an idiot micromanaging owner.


Hey, Sammy...don't let these Cowboy fans get you down. I'm a Cowboy fan and I am totally on your side!

I absolutely love Campbell! He's the best thing to ever happen for your team in today's world. Also, regarding Zorn sticking up for Campbell, he's right! I mean Zorn has been a head coach for a second year now! The guy knows talent.

I wouldn't trade Campbell for Romo if they offered me money!

You guys are headed in the right directiion...

;)
 

Mansta54

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,945
Reaction score
482
5Stars;2887478 said:
Hey, Sammy...don't let these Cowboy fans get you down. I'm a Cowboy fan and I am totally on your side!

I absolutely love Campbell! He's the best thing to ever happen for your team in today's world. Also, regarding Zorn sticking up for Campbell, he's right! I mean Zorn has been a head coach for a second year now! The guy knows talent.

I wouldn't trade Campbell for Romo if they offered me money!

You guys are headed in the right directiion...

;)

:liarliar: :D
 

5Stars

Here comes the Sun...
Messages
37,846
Reaction score
16,869
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Mansta54;2887481 said:
:liarliar: :D


:laugh2:


I ain't lying, bro! You might think I am...but I am totally serious! I love JC...and Zorn!

You should too!
 

Sammy Baugh

New Member
Messages
178
Reaction score
0
Hostile;2887305 said:
I dunno, I think the idiot micromanaging owner was more right than the football professional on that point. I like Jason Campbell way more than most Cowboys fans but I think you paid too much for him and he isn't nealry good enough to let you compete in this division.

Let's look at last year:
Romo 91.4 rating 3448 yards 61.3% 26 TD 14 Int
McNabb 86.4 rating 3916 yards 60.4% 23 TD 11 Int
Eli 86.4 rating 3238 yards 60.3% 21 TD 10 Int
Campbell 84.3 rating 3245 yards 62.3% 13 TD 6 Int
Roethlisberger 80.1 rating 3301 yards 59.9% 17 TD 15 Int

Now let's consider that JC, the youngest of these QB's, was playing in a new system. The other QB's have been in the same systems for several years. McNabb has been in the same system for about a decade. It took Favre and Hasselbeck a few years to master the WCO but Campbell has had only one year.

Let's also consider that Romo clearly had a better year than Campbell, so I will discuss Eli, McNabb, and Roethlisberger.

What we then see is that Campbell actually compared favorably with Eli, McNabb, and Big Ben, the two qb's in the division who were in the playoffs plus the Super Bowl winner. He had the highest completion percentage of any QB in the division. He threw for more yards than Eli, a Super Bowl winner. Except for yards, where they were close, Campbell had better numbers than Big Ben. Campbell was more turnover-stingy than any of the other qb's on the list. Even when Campbell's numbers were worse than the other qb's on the list, for the most part (excepting yardage vis-a-vis McNabb) JC's numbers were pretty close.

Now let's consider that JC has more room to grow than the other qb's on this list because of his relative youth as well as his presumed comfort from being in the same system again. Given all this, it is obvious Campbell can be quite competitive in the NFC East.
 

Mansta54

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,945
Reaction score
482
Sammy Baugh;2887562 said:
Let's look at last year:
Romo 91.4 rating 3448 yards 61.3% 26 TD 14 Int
McNabb 86.4 rating 3916 yards 60.4% 23 TD 11 Int
Eli 86.4 rating 3238 yards 60.3% 21 TD 10 Int
Campbell 84.3 rating 3245 yards 62.3% 13 TD 6 Int
Roethlisberger 80.1 rating 3301 yards 59.9% 17 TD 15 Int

Now let's consider that JC, the youngest of these QB's, was playing in a new system. The other QB's have been in the same systems for several years. McNabb has been in the same system for about a decade. It took Favre and Hasselbeck a few years to master the WCO but Campbell has had only one year.

Let's also consider that Romo clearly had a better year than Campbell, so I will discuss Eli, McNabb, and Roethlisberger.

What we then see is that Campbell actually compared favorably with Eli, McNabb, and Big Ben, the two qb's in the division who were in the playoffs plus the Super Bowl winner. He had the highest completion percentage of any QB in the division. He threw for more yards than Eli, a Super Bowl winner. Except for yards, where they were close, Campbell had better numbers than Big Ben. Campbell was more turnover-stingy than any of the other qb's on the list. Even when Campbell's numbers were worse than the other qb's on the list, for the most part (excepting yardage vis-a-vis McNabb) JC's numbers were pretty close.

Now let's consider that JC has more room to grow than the other qb's on this list because of his relative youth as well as his presumed comfort from being in the same system again. Given all this, it is obvious Campbell can be quite competitive in the NFC East.

All I can say is.....:lmao2: :lmao2: :lmao2: :lmao2: :lmao2: :lmao2:
 

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
Sammy Baugh;2887562 said:
Let's look at last year:
Romo 91.4 rating 3448 yards 61.3% 26 TD 14 Int
McNabb 86.4 rating 3916 yards 60.4% 23 TD 11 Int
Eli 86.4 rating 3238 yards 60.3% 21 TD 10 Int
Campbell 84.3 rating 3245 yards 62.3% 13 TD 6 Int
Roethlisberger 80.1 rating 3301 yards 59.9% 17 TD 15 Int

Now let's consider that JC, the youngest of these QB's, was playing in a new system. The other QB's have been in the same systems for several years. McNabb has been in the same system for about a decade. It took Favre and Hasselbeck a few years to master the WCO but Campbell has had only one year.

Let's also consider that Romo clearly had a better year than Campbell, so I will discuss Eli, McNabb, and Roethlisberger.

What we then see is that Campbell actually compared favorably with Eli, McNabb, and Big Ben, the two qb's in the division who were in the playoffs plus the Super Bowl winner. He had the highest completion percentage of any QB in the division. He threw for more yards than Eli, a Super Bowl winner. Except for yards, where they were close, Campbell had better numbers than Big Ben. Campbell was more turnover-stingy than any of the other qb's on the list. Even when Campbell's numbers were worse than the other qb's on the list, for the most part (excepting yardage vis-a-vis McNabb) JC's numbers were pretty close.

Now let's consider that JC has more room to grow than the other qb's on this list because of his relative youth as well as his presumed comfort from being in the same system again. Given all this, it is obvious Campbell can be quite competitive in the NFC East.
Oh my gosh, you are not seriously telling me he is on par with Roethlesberger, Eli, and McNabb. Please tell me you're not trying to claim that.

13 TDs is comparable to 23? To 21? To 17? Hell man why not just make it comparable to Brady's NFL record.
 

SaltwaterServr

Blank Paper Offends Me
Messages
8,124
Reaction score
1
Sammy Baugh;2887562 said:
Let's look at last year:
Romo 91.4 rating 3448 yards 61.3% 26 TD 14 Int
McNabb 86.4 rating 3916 yards 60.4% 23 TD 11 Int
Eli 86.4 rating 3238 yards 60.3% 21 TD 10 Int
Campbell 84.3 rating 3245 yards 62.3% 13 TD 6 Int
Roethlisberger 80.1 rating 3301 yards 59.9% 17 TD 15 Int

Now let's consider that JC, the youngest of these QB's, was playing in a new system. The other QB's have been in the same systems for several years. McNabb has been in the same system for about a decade. It took Favre and Hasselbeck a few years to master the WCO but Campbell has had only one year.

Let's also consider that Romo clearly had a better year than Campbell, so I will discuss Eli, McNabb, and Roethlisberger.

What we then see is that Campbell actually compared favorably with Eli, McNabb, and Big Ben, the two qb's in the division who were in the playoffs plus the Super Bowl winner. He had the highest completion percentage of any QB in the division. He threw for more yards than Eli, a Super Bowl winner. Except for yards, where they were close, Campbell had better numbers than Big Ben. Campbell was more turnover-stingy than any of the other qb's on the list. Even when Campbell's numbers were worse than the other qb's on the list, for the most part (excepting yardage vis-a-vis McNabb) JC's numbers were pretty close.

Now let's consider that JC has more room to grow than the other qb's on this list because of his relative youth as well as his presumed comfort from being in the same system again. Given all this, it is obvious Campbell can be quite competitive in the NFC East.

That honestly made me laugh. What color is the sky in your world? :rolleyes:
 

Sammy Baugh

New Member
Messages
178
Reaction score
0
Hostile;2887574 said:
Oh my gosh, you ar enot seriously telling me he is on par with Roethlesberger, Eli, and McNabb. Please tell me you're not trying to claim that.

13 TDs is comparable to 23? To 21? To 17? Hell man why not just make it comparable to Brady's NFL record.

No, if you read my post carefully you will see that I am not saying that. What I was saying was, if conditions are considered, Campbell's numbers were not that far off of other qb's who are unimpeachably competitive in the NFC East. Therefore Campbell has shown that he can be considered competitive in the NFC East, contrary to the claims of others.

You and I both know that simply pulling out TD's is not entirely fair. Heck, I could just pull out the interception column and argue that Campbell is far superior to the other qb's I listed. But I won't go there, because we both know that there is more to consider than either just td's or just interceptions. That is why I listed a variety of numbers.

But, hey, nothing gets settled here, nor is anything settled within the stats vault at NFL.com. Games are settled on the field. So let's just see what happens in 2009, shall we? You might be unpleasantly surprised!
 

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
Sammy Baugh;2887641 said:
No, if you read my post carefully you will see that I am not saying that. What I was saying was, if conditions are considered, Campbell's numbers were not that far off of other qb's who are unimpeachably competitive in the NFC East. Therefore Campbell has shown that he can be considered competitive in the NFC East, contrary to the claims of others.

You and I both know that simply pulling out TD's is not entirely fair. Heck, I could just pull out the interception column and argue that Campbell is far superior to the other qb's I listed. But I won't go there, because we both know that there is more to consider than either just td's or just interceptions. That is why I listed a variety of numbers.

But, hey, nothing gets settled here, nor is anything settled within the stats vault at NFL.com. Games are settled on the field. So let's just see what happens in 2009, shall we? You might be unpleasantly surprised!
:lmao2:

In other words if you cherry pick one point.

He is not comparable to the other 3 QBs in the division. That's laughable.
 
Top