PJTHEDOORS
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 18,190
- Reaction score
- 18,582
Wilson. LOL at anyone who picks Romo. That loser would have thrown 2 picks tonight minimum.
That loser with that defense, that OL, and a great rb. Ya, loser Romo, lol.
Wilson. LOL at anyone who picks Romo. That loser would have thrown 2 picks tonight minimum.
Shut up dude your annoying
Jesus Christ
but he has something Romo has never had... a defense and receivers who don't give up on routes and an offensive line.
Romo is better but we're comparing a 2nd year player to a guy in the prime of his career.
Dude Russell won a sb and made plays. They also said he finish the season with a 110+ passer rating for the season. Russell made some heck of some plays.
This thread is a joke.
Kevin Kolb could have won tonight with the defense Seattle put out there.
Russell Wilson is in a absolute perfect situation.
So was Romo during the 2006 playoffs...but what did he do???
So was Romo during the 2006 playoffs...but what did he do???
I don't watch much Seattle football. So I have always thought Wilson was all hype and not much substance.
But after watching this game, on the biggest stage, Wilson has shown me he is not just hype. He can make plays with his feet, which we all knew. But he also makes plays with his arm. He's out dueling Peyton. He elevates his team to another level with his play and leadership, something romo has never accomplished, at least not to the degree Wilson has. He's playing better than I've ever seen romo play.
This is not meant to be a slap in the face to tony. He helped make this franchise relevant again and I appreciate him for doing so.
You can make the argument that Wilson has a better team "and it's a team game yada yada".. And then there will be the guys that bring up stats. "Tony threw for more yards and TD's".... Well let me tell you something, STATS AREN'T THE END ALL BE ALL WHEN IT COMES TO EVALUATING PLAYERS TALENT.
I'm watching Wilson make plays that Romo could not make. And I don't mean that as a shot towards romo. The broncos get pressure on Wilson and Wilson escapes it and finds receivers open or takes off for 20 yard gain. I believe if it werent for Wilson, the Seahawks would not be playing in the Super Bowl. But who knows? You have to have a good qb play to win.
But my real question to you guys is: Romo in his prime or Wilson? Who would you take?
Room better QB, doesn't elevate players around him; like Carmelo Anthony; Wilson may be a better leader for his team. Overall Romo would probably be my choice if I didn't know better, Wilson doesn't make or hasn't made game losing mistakes.
Might that be because Seattle, unlike our beloved Boys, doesn't need to place their QB in a position to lose games?
The 2013 Hawks held 16 of 19 opponents to 20 pts or less, 7 of 19 to single digits. Not coincidentally, the Hawks were 31st in the league in pass attempts.
We, otoh, held only 4 of our opponents under 20 pts all season; 7 of our opponents scored 30+. As a result we threw the ball a lot (13th, tied w/Pitts).
Romo had that type of running game and defense in 2006? Hmmm...interesting. I must have slept through the part of the Cowboys last 20 years when they had a defense that was even remotely as good as Seattle's.
Our defense sucked.
It was good enough to make the playoffs and help us win 9 games...