LOL it was the Rams. Romo always pads his stats against the inferior teams...
Yes, I would still take Smith & Flacco over Romo. I'm glad Romo had a good game though and I hope it can continue, because that means my team is winning.
Flacco is one thing, though I think he is highly overrated, but Alex Smith? Give me a break.
He plays within his skills and doesn't turn the ball over much. I like that about him. Also being mobile is a plus. Smith is underrated.
He plays within his skills and doesn't turn the ball over much. I like that about him. Also being mobile is a plus. Smith is underrated.
LOL it was the Rams. Romo always pads his stats against the inferior teams...
He also had a playoff run that hasn't been seen the likes of Montana. I don't care about regular season stats.. I care about the playoffs and superbowls. Stats can be very misleading.. Eli and Flacco proved that.
You seriously said you prefer Alex Smith to Tony Romo?!?!! That's amazing.
And Alex Smith is underrated, I'd agree. But that's still a collossally bad take on those two QBs.
Ray Rice providing a solid running game helped him out, along with an OL that played extremely well. Heck, even the defense played better than must expected. And it still took a gift from the Denver safety for them to win that game. Same situation, Denver wins that game at least 8/10 times.
I agree about it being a somewhat lucky win against Denver.. and yeah, we can say he had a wonderful running back and Oline.. but at the end of the day, nobody can deny how well Flacco played. Again, he put up Montanta stats in that playoff run.
And I said the same thing about Flacco a while back and a few here thought I was crazy until he put up Montana numbers in the playoffs/superbowl. Again, Alex Smith plays within himself, doesn't turn the ball over much, and is mobile. He is highly under rated but not for long.
Lol. Flacco is a very different argument. And, again, Alex Smith does play within himself, doesn't turn the ball over much, and he can run it some for you (he can't throw downfield on the run much at all, and that's a lot more important when it comes to 'mobility.') All that said, he's not in Tony Romo's category as a QB, and it's not even close, and that's going to be the case for his entire career.
Come on people. You guys are now going to jump on here and say "I told you so!", when for the last 3 years, the majority of people who have had issue with Romo and this offense have done so, because they felt as if there was no balance to the offense and Romo was trying to do too much? Really?
If anything, Sunday's game should serve as confirmation that what many were saying is accurate.
If we are going to have an honest discussion, you must at the very least, be genuine in the facts.