Rooting for 3-13

[charron]

3-13 doesn't change much. Yes they'd probably draft someone that doesn't require 3 years of training to not be terrible but this front office still has the same plan of mediocrity. The've won 12 games the last 3 years and didn't bother trying to make big impact trades in order to get over the hump. They are 3-3 with no depth anywhere and still say they are SB contenders. They lost their desire to win long ago and just want to do enough to sell tickets. Winning 3 games or 12 games always ends the same.

 

[Creeper]

I don't see 3-13, but 6-11 is possible. We should be picking in the top 15 which means we have a shot at an impact player. The only question is which position? DE, WR, RB, DT are all huge needs. I would probably look for a RB later, but DE and DT might be perfect in that range.