HoosierCowboy
Put Pearson in the HOF
- Messages
- 2,388
- Reaction score
- 400
I think last year is "proof" that Romo had a great deal to do with some of his teams being good.Romo has had some very good teams. That's a myth he's had bad teams.
I think last year is "proof" that Romo had a great deal to do with some of his teams being good.Romo has had some very good teams. That's a myth he's had bad teams.
I think all three of those 8-8 teams would've been at least as bad as last years results.I think last year is "proof" that Romo had a great deal to do with some of his teams being good.
Eli's a borderline HOFer but those 2 SB's probably get him in depending on what he does from here on out.Out of the three QB on that list Romo and Rivers is a decent discussion for who is better. I suspect if you dive down into the numbers on a per game basis Romo will be better. Eli is the worst QB of the three but the most likely to get into the HOF because he has two rings. And frankly the standard sportswriter doesn't want to dive into stats too often, because that's a skill set that most of them just don't have. They frequently want the narrative to be handed to them. The two rings for Eli makes a simple narrative all tied up with a bow. Maybe by the time he's eligible there will be some better voted for the HOF, but I'm not holding my breath just yet.
Among current QB, a good comparison to White would be Matt Ryan. Neither one a top 5 QB, both better than average in the regular season and a little worse than average in the playoffs.Danny White only started 92 games. His INT to TD ratio was about 1.15 to 1.
Romo has 127 starts and a TD to INT ratio of better than 2 to 1.
Those aren't numbers that rely upon insane passing of today such as passing yards or passing TDs where he blows White out of the water totally.
You mean Linehan?It says mostly that Romo is the offence and that Garrett is incapable of coaching them up when Romo is not there
I think last year is "proof" that Romo had a great deal to do with some of his teams being good.
He'll probably go down as one of the best QB not in the HOF, unless something like the above happens, or he stays healthy enough to put up three more top-10 seasons. With 25 quarterbacks in the HOF, it would be hard to ignore something that only he and 5-6 other QB had done.I think if Romo can get to a Superbowl, even if he doesn't win it, he's a lock (not 1st ballot, but he makes it).
I think if Romo can get a NFC Championship game, and gets' no further than that, he has slightly better than a 50% chance of making it.
If his career ended today, I don't like his chances.
You mean Linehan?
I love Romo, but you can call the 2007 Cowboys anything but a bad team.Romo ranks up with the greats statistically--he can't help that he played on bad teams. Don't mention that tired crap about winning SBs--those are team awards. Being great on a bad team is actually a point in his favor.
Garrett is the HC, buck stops with him. I also do not remember Linehan being there since 2010 and Garrett's record even before last year without Romo was abysmal.
Linehan is the play caller. He's responsible for this offense being bad without Romo as well. The defense overachieved. So does Garrett get credit for this defense overachieving last season?
Yeah.I love Romo, but you can call the 2007 Cowboys anything but a bad team.