Tucker says: "People want him to hire a "football" guy and I know what they think that means but if you've been a general manager and running the show for 25 years don't you become a "football" guy? So a guy in his mid to late 30s who's been a scout and been in the NFL for 10-15 years is much more qualified to run an organization than Jerry Jones is at this point? I don't think so."
Here's where I think he's wrong. That guy in his mid to late 30s who's been a scout and been in the NFL 10-15 years has been around the game from the bottom up. He's met and (hopefully) learned from lots of other football guys who knew more than he did, and he absorbed it, saw the results in (presumably) a number of organizations and learned from the mistakes of others (in addition to his own).
Jerry started at the top. Whatever he's learned, he's learned as the top guy -- not as the bottom-rung grunt who has to work his way up to succeed. Jerry may know a lot of owners, but are they the "football" guys he can learn from. And his experience is solely with the Cowboys -- a team the only HE has had control over. In short, Jerry's experience may be long in years, but it's thin and limited to football life at the top. And the results seem to show that kind of shallow experience isn't good enough.