rotoworld: All signs point to Owens leaving cowboys *Merge*
- Thread starter JBS
- Start date
RoadRunner
New Member
- Messages
- 2,809
- Reaction score
- 0
Rampage;2632738 said:
I could apply the same logic to Flozell Adams (the real team cancer). How do 31 other teams get by without FLozell?
SLATEmosphere
Benched
- Messages
- 9,633
- Reaction score
- 2
Rampage;2632738 said:
It really makes me wonder..how will we ever move the ball without TO
DuaneThomas71
Benched
- Messages
- 175
- Reaction score
- 0
5Stars;2632730 said:
Stop caring so much about the "scene" and start caring about on field performance. That's why you watch football, right? To see your team win. Not to feel all warm and fuzzy inside because the media paints the picture of Wit-o teammatesss holding hay-yonds and being cwass acts on and off da field.
Cowboys2008
New Member
- Messages
- 929
- Reaction score
- 0
I don't believe it. We're the Dallas Cowboys. And he hasn't done enough to warrant our dismissal of his services. Not even close IMO.
The only way I see something like this happening is if Jerry is actually eyeing up another one of the big name receivers out there to replace him immediately. Otherwise the risk is just to great to simply hand over the spot to Roy Williams at this early point without some sort of legit backup plan in the works. Williams has done absolute nothing to prove he can be the type of receiver we need at #1, and make a legitimate run at a Super Bowl any time soon. TO on the other hand though, is that statistical type of player who can give us the numbers we need from the position.
Add in, we don't have a #1 pick thanks to #11. Thus no avenue of help available to us in the draft without an extreme cost to this franchise. All while still facing the fact that we've lost one of our most productive players.
The only way I see something like this happening is if Jerry is actually eyeing up another one of the big name receivers out there to replace him immediately. Otherwise the risk is just to great to simply hand over the spot to Roy Williams at this early point without some sort of legit backup plan in the works. Williams has done absolute nothing to prove he can be the type of receiver we need at #1, and make a legitimate run at a Super Bowl any time soon. TO on the other hand though, is that statistical type of player who can give us the numbers we need from the position.
Add in, we don't have a #1 pick thanks to #11. Thus no avenue of help available to us in the draft without an extreme cost to this franchise. All while still facing the fact that we've lost one of our most productive players.
Bleu Star
Bye Felicia!
- Messages
- 33,925
- Reaction score
- 19,920
5Stars;2632765 said:
Oh. You obviously have no idea who you're messing with. I enjoy the banter just as long as it remains of a good nature. I have zero CZ members on ignore and don't see the need for using that button anytime soon. I was just pointing out the fact that you get a little juvenile when someone disagrees with you.
5Stars
Here comes the Sun...
- Messages
- 37,847
- Reaction score
- 16,869
Bleu Star;2632772 said:Oh. You obviously have no idea who you're messing with. I enjoy the banter just as long as it remains of a good nature. I have zero CZ members on ignore and don't see the need for using that button anytime soon. I was just pointing out the fact that you get a little juvenile when someone disagrees with you.
:laugh2:
Tell me who?
DuaneThomas71
Benched
- Messages
- 175
- Reaction score
- 0
Rampage;2632764 said:
Why Pacman and Tank? What makes those guys bigger distractions than Tony "dates Jessica Simpson/goes on vacations with her" Romo?
Sure, they have criminal records, but then T.O. doesn't have a criminal record, yet he's still so obviously a distraction, right?
DuaneThomas71
Benched
- Messages
- 175
- Reaction score
- 0
Those of you who recite this are apparently unaware of the fact that you're indirectly saying that Terrell Owens is single-handedly responsible for the team not winning.
The Cowboys aren't good enough to win WITH T.O. We found that out this year (supposedly), which is why you want him gone.
Yet when you claim this team can win WITHOUT HIM...what you are saying is that, if you remove T.O. from the equation, this is a team that can win.
With him, not good enough to win. Without him, good enough to win. Hence THE problem was--HIM.
You can't have it both ways.
Either Terrell Owens is THE reason the team wasn't winning...or he's merely part of it, but the Cowboys are NOT good enough to win without him. They can cut him and help themselves, but unless they make numerous other changes, they still aren't good enough, hence, in the end, the move will do them little good unless they make it in conjunction with other changes.
The Cowboys aren't good enough to win WITH T.O. We found that out this year (supposedly), which is why you want him gone.
Yet when you claim this team can win WITHOUT HIM...what you are saying is that, if you remove T.O. from the equation, this is a team that can win.
With him, not good enough to win. Without him, good enough to win. Hence THE problem was--HIM.
You can't have it both ways.
Either Terrell Owens is THE reason the team wasn't winning...or he's merely part of it, but the Cowboys are NOT good enough to win without him. They can cut him and help themselves, but unless they make numerous other changes, they still aren't good enough, hence, in the end, the move will do them little good unless they make it in conjunction with other changes.