Alexander
What's it going to be then, eh?
- Messages
- 62,499
- Reaction score
- 67,317
Undrafted free agents are not quite the same and should not be quantified like a draft choice.pancakeman;3166408 said:I come at it from the another angle - the successes we've had with undrafted and low-drafted players make it more acceptable that some of our other gambles have paid out lower than expected. I take it as inevitable that some personnel moves will exceed expectations and some will fall short, and on balance (and particularly with the receiving corps as a group), I think we should be pleased with the hit-to-miss ratio.
For the most part, they are determined by several factors, one of which is a signing bonus and their own choice where to go where they know they have the best chance to compete for a job. One of the primary reasons we landed Romo in Dallas was because he could look and see that Quincy Carter and Chad Hutchinson were easier competition than what he would have had to face in Denver. Austin looked at an aging Glenn and Keyshawn Johnson and saw an opportunity to compete for a third WR job against other undrafted free agent types.
Our own ineptitude at choosing WRs and QBs in the normal selection process in essence helped us land these players. That is hardly something to be extremely smug about. For years we have had the benefit of doing well with undrafted players. That says as much about our drafting issues as it does about any supposed success.
Austin and Romo are unique. There was a graphic that stated that they were the best combination of undrafted players in history. That should tell you how rare it is to be that fortunate and how unreliable it would be to depend on that kind of fortune again.