I think people are looking at the WR position wrong because of money and a trade. I find that kind of ridiculous.
It should be looked at according to production. When you combine the entire corps of WRs and compare the actual numbers there is no doubt we improved as a team without Owens.
Whether people like that or not, is irrelevant. You can look at a player from one year to the next and determine improvement or decline. But the WRs had different roles from last year to this one. It isn't fair to compare Austin to Owens. It isn't fair to compare Stanback to Ogletree.
It is absolutely fair to compare the entire Corps of WRs in 2008 to the entire Corps of WRs in 2009. Why? Because the team philosophy has not changed, merely the implementation of it.
Owens...69 receptions, 1052 yards, 10 TDs
Williams...19 receptions, 198 yards, 1 TD
Crayton...39 receptions, 550 yards, 4 TDs
Austin...13 receptions, 278 yards, 3 TDs
Stanback...2 receptions, 24 yards
That comes to 142 receptions, 2302 yards, 18 TDs for the WR corps.
Austin...81 receptions, 1320 yards, 11 TDs
Williams...38 receptions, 596 yards, 7 TDs
Crayton...37 receptions, 622 yards, 5 TDs
Hurd...7 receptions, 121 yards, 1 TD
Ogletree...7 receptions, 96 yards
That comes to 170 receptions, 2755 yards, 24 TDs for the WR corps.
I don't know about where you guys come from by I see improvement across the entire corps of guys.