InmanRoshi;2263196 said:
Include Larry Brown in the conspiracy ... think he might know something about NFL coverage schemes?
Some of you guys were defending him and refusing to believe the obvious even as he was getting his playing time taken away by the coaches last year. You act like it's just an every day, common thing for a supposed "Pro Bowl" safety to stand on the sidelines during the most critical downs. And you're accusing others of poster speak?
I don't really think you guys are engaging in poster-speak. It's just I thought in this thread we were pretending people mean the opposite of, you know, what they explicitly say, so I got confused.
This dispute really has little to do with Roy Williams. I only saw the tail end of the play live anyway, and I have no idea what the coverage responsibility actually was. I just happen to think it's *beyond* silly to pretend Wade's lying for no reason about a very specific point that he wasn't even asked about.
People defend Roy when he's criticized unfairly. Things like saying he's a supposed 'pro bowl' safety when there's nothing supposed or quotation-worthy about it. At the same time, we understand that there's a reason why he's lost snaps. I don't know that there's any of us who wouldn't be happy if his replacement comes in, plays better, and the team improves as a result.