- Messages
- 100,728
- Reaction score
- 108,614
Uh, no.we pretty much drafted switzer as his replacement
Really?
Uh, no.we pretty much drafted switzer as his replacement
I heard it and so did many other fans it’s swirling in FB and Twitter now because of what he said.Interesting that there is nothing from his twitter about it.
Normally he would be bringing it up and telling you to go to his pay site to read about it by now.
Plus yesterday he had the nerve to challenge the organization's decision to cut Sterling Moore and demanded he be re-signed.Beasley tweeted some expletives about not being happy not getting the ball after the Cardinals game. He's not going to be in Dallas for long, whether its this year or in the offseason.
Further proof he reports both sides of an issue and then claims he was right.Did he just deny his own scoop?
Or did he just make it up from an NFL.com speculation article and try to get it legs just to get it shot down?
Hmmm.
For 5.99 you can know the inside scoop on Fishers inside scoopDid he just deny his own scoop?
Or did he just make it up from an NFL.com speculation article and try to get it legs just to get it shot down?
Hmmm.
Its fine buddy, we dont have to agree. This is all an unrealistic hypothetical. I love Beasley as well. I just happen to think having a stud LB would be more valuable than Beasley is to the team currently.
Uh, no.
Really?
That's nada my friend.Beasley is under contract only through 2018 and carries a $4MM cap hit next year.
I'll take more options for Dak.
I would not. He would be a progress stopper for Anthony Hitchens.
I have got to hear this.
Cool I happen to think the offense would remain stellar without him and the defense kinda sux.