S-Payton Past Interest on Romo

Parche

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,028
Reaction score
101
HogsRLegends;1645399 said:
More success. Again, Bledsoe was a number 1 pick in the entire NFL draft. Romo is an undrafted free agent.

So your Campbell should be playing a lot better than he´s playing, because he was drafted, and instead that, he´s playing worse than Romo... Or you too mean that that´s because your O-Line and OurS?? Come on dude, keep dreaming, you can´t define a player by his draft status.
 

HogsRLegends

New Member
Messages
646
Reaction score
0
Parche;1645402 said:
So your Campbell should be playing a lot better than he´s playing, because he was drafted, and instead that, he´s playing worse than Romo... Or you too mean that that´s because your O-Line and OurS?? Come on dude, keep dreaming, you can´t define a player by his draft status.


Campbell isn't doing badly considering he hasn't been in the system very long. For the first time in a long time, your OL is as good as ours...that is why Romo, Brady etc are succeeding.

No way do they have more talent then Bledsoe.
 

PBJTime

Semper Fidelis
Messages
2,717
Reaction score
1
HogsRLegends;1645407 said:
Campbell isn't doing badly considering he hasn't been in the system very long. For the first time in a long time, your OL is as good as ours...that is why Romo, Brady etc are succeeding.

No way do they have more talent then Bledsoe.

Which is why so many teams were clamoring to pick up Bledsoe?

I'm doing it again...where did I put my Troll-B-Gone?
 

Parche

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,028
Reaction score
101
HogsRLegends;1645407 said:
Campbell isn't doing badly considering he hasn't been in the system very long. For the first time in a long time, your OL is as good as ours...that is why Romo, Brady etc are succeeding.

No way do they have more talent then Bledsoe.


So that´s the reason why Brady Won it all this years, well dude thanks for the information!! I thought it was because Brady was outstanding but now I know that everything comes down to the OL on offense and Qbcking play.
 

HogsRLegends

New Member
Messages
646
Reaction score
0
PBJTime;1645409 said:
Which is why so many teams were clamoring to pick up Bledsoe?

I'm doing it again...where did I put my Troll-B-Gone?

My point is this...Bledsoe got you guys to 9-7 with probably one of the worst offensive lines in football.

Romo got you guys to 9-7 with a vastly improved offensive line last year.

Stats aside, you tell me who made more with less.
 

HogsRLegends

New Member
Messages
646
Reaction score
0
Parche;1645413 said:
So that´s the reason why Brady Won it all this years, well dude thanks for the information!! I thought it was because Brady was outstanding but now I know that everything comes down to the OL on offense and Qbcking play.

I'm not saying Brady is horrible but if you watch any of the Jets/Pats game, the Jets didn't lay a finger on him.
 

Parche

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,028
Reaction score
101
HogsRLegends;1645415 said:
My point is this...Bledsoe got you guys to 9-7 with probably one of the worst offensive lines in football.

Romo got you guys to 9-7 with a vastly improved offensive line last year.

Stats aside, you tell me who made more with less.

Yeah, and Romo also was the reason why our D struggled the last part of season, Romo was the reason why Williams is still ugly on coverage, and Romo was the reason why we cant put pressure on the Qb.

Yeah, we were 9-7 with Romo and it was all his fault.
 

Nors

Benched
Messages
22,015
Reaction score
1
Bledsoe also posted 28 points a game before hooked in 2006. In my heart of hearts I believe Bledsoe shreds that terrible Seattle secondary in playoffs.

But in big picture Parcells did the long term right thing for this organization to his short term detriment.

Romo is our future and that experience benefits us forward.
 

PBJTime

Semper Fidelis
Messages
2,717
Reaction score
1
HogsRLegends;1645415 said:
My point is this...Bledsoe got you guys to 9-7 with probably one of the worst offensive lines in football.

Romo got you guys to 9-7 with a vastly improved offensive line last year.

Stats aside, you tell me who made more with less.

"Stats aside"? Of course, why ruin a perfectly good argument with facts...

There are so many variables involved that you can't just say who made more with less. I can say that the defense fell apart near the end of the year with Romo made to come from behind. Romo was also getting pressured and there were so many plays that Romo made where I thought to myself, "Bledsoe would've taken a sack right there." Bledsoe was nowhere NEAR as mobile. I wouldn't say the line was VASTLY improved by any stretch either. This year, I am happier with it though.
 

Taz

Member
Messages
657
Reaction score
15
NO QB>Dallas QB

ALso i think with brady cheating we have proved payton manning the best nfl QB right now
 

Nors

Benched
Messages
22,015
Reaction score
1
PBJTime;1645422 said:
"Stats aside"? Of course, why ruin a perfectly good argument with facts...

There are so many variables involved that you can't just say who made more with less. I can say that the defense fell apart near the end of the year with Romo made to come from behind. Romo was also getting pressured and there were so many plays that Romo made where I thought to myself, "Bledsoe would've taken a sack right there." Bledsoe was nowhere NEAR as mobile. I wouldn't say the line was VASTLY improved by any stretch either. This year, I am happier with it though.


The defense collapsed late in season in 2005 also(trend). We were off top of my head 6-2 or 7-3 at one point in 2005.
 

PBJTime

Semper Fidelis
Messages
2,717
Reaction score
1
Nors;1645427 said:
The defense collapsed late in season in 2005 also(trend). We were off top of my head 6-2 or 7-3 at one point in 2005.

I believe you are right. I still maintain that nobody in their right mind, given the choice between Bledsoe and Romo, would take Bledsoe to lead their team.
 

HogsRLegends

New Member
Messages
646
Reaction score
0
PBJTime;1645422 said:
"Stats aside"? Of course, why ruin a perfectly good argument with facts...

There are so many variables involved that you can't just say who made more with less. I can say that the defense fell apart near the end of the year with Romo made to come from behind. Romo was also getting pressured and there were so many plays that Romo made where I thought to myself, "Bledsoe would've taken a sack right there." Bledsoe was nowhere NEAR as mobile. I wouldn't say the line was VASTLY improved by any stretch either. This year, I am happier with it though.


True, but I knew your line in 2005 was one of the worst when Phillip Daniels had 4 sacks against Torrin Tucker. Simply having Flozell in there rather then Tucker alone is an enormous upgrade. Now you guys have Leonard Davis, Gurode, and Colombo and have eliminated the weak links you had with Rivera and Petitti.
 

CATCH17

1st Round Pick
Messages
67,667
Reaction score
86,213
HogsRLegends;1645399 said:
More success. Again, Bledsoe was a number 1 pick in the entire NFL draft. Romo is an undrafted free agent.

lol

Man just think if we had Jason Campbell and Washington had Romo. What a great trade for both teams that would be :laugh2:
 

DragonCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,498
Reaction score
250
HogsRLegends;1645433 said:
True, but I knew your line in 2005 was one of the worst when Phillip Daniels had 4 sacks against Torrin Tucker. Simply having Flozell in there rather then Tucker alone is an enormous upgrade. Now you guys have Leonard Davis, Gurode, and Colombo and have eliminated the weak links you had with Rivera and Petitti.

First of all, we're not gonna be comparing Bledsoe 2005 to Romo 2006. If any comparison is to be made, it must be between Bledsoe 2006 and Romo 2006.

Bledsoe 2006:

@ Jacksonville - Dallas went up 10-0, and I honestly thought we were back. Then, Bledsoe proceeds to throw 3 INTs, and an ugly TD pass that was on the wrong side of TO, to lose 24-17. Honestly, Bledsoe deserves the blame for that loss.

vs. Commanders - Bledsoe played well, defense played well, Commanders looked lackluster. Still, beating up on a bad team is nothing to write home about.

BYE

@ Tennessee - see vs. Commanders

@ Philadelphia - This was a back and forth game. Started out badly, but then a big play by Ware gets us up I believe 14-10. However, Bledsoe had ample opportunities to win the game, but failed to do so. Again, 3 INTs, too many mistakes.

vs. Houston - see vs. Commanders

vs. Giants - Once again, this was a back and forth game in the first half, but the Bledsoe INT to Madison ended a potential lead-taking drive.

Basically, Bledsoe could usually put us in a position to win, but it always seemed like, when it got to crunch time, he would very rarely deliver. However, Romo does seem to deliver, whether it is 4th down or the last minute in the 4th. I'm much happier having Romo under center, because IMO, he gives us a chance to win those big, close games.
 

dallasfan

New Member
Messages
978
Reaction score
0
HogsRLegends;1645399 said:
More success. Again, Bledsoe was a number 1 pick in the entire NFL draft. Romo is an undrafted free agent.

Bledsoe probably would've been an upgrade if we were getting the 96' version, but the 07' version is done. I've never liked Bledsoe as a player, even in NE, but I respect what he did, even for us, but it's silly to believe he's better than Romo.

How do you explain the increase in offensive production when we made the switch? Can't claim the o-line was better, considering Romo played behind the same o-line in his 7 starts last year.

On top of that, it's also clear you don't watch Dallas games, cause if you did, you'd know that Bledsoe probably would've been sacked at least 3 to 4 times on Sunday, while the o-line blocked good, there were a few times he rolled out the pocket to buy more time, something Bledsoe can't do, atleast not anymore.
 

TunaFan33

Benched
Messages
1,824
Reaction score
0
Nors;1645427 said:
The defense collapsed late in season in 2005 also(trend). We were off top of my head 6-2 or 7-3 at one point in 2005.

Ultimately, our kicking game put the nail in our coffin(and Parcells cutting our long snapper, Jeff Robinson, was partly the reason too).

We would have won 2-3 more games if it was decent.
 

TunaFan33

Benched
Messages
1,824
Reaction score
0
dallasfan;1645463 said:
Bledsoe probably would've been an upgrade if we were getting the 96' version, but the 07' version is done. I've never liked Bledsoe as a player, even in NE, but I respect what he did, even for us, but it's silly to believe he's better than Romo.

How do you explain the increase in offensive production when we made the switch? Can't claim the o-line was better, considering Romo played behind the same o-line in his 7 starts last year.

On top of that, it's also clear you don't watch Dallas games, cause if you did, you'd know that Bledsoe probably would've been sacked at least 3 to 4 times on Sunday, while the o-line blocked good, there were a few times he rolled out the pocket to buy more time, something Bledsoe can't do, atleast not anymore.

Okay-what IF Tuna stubbornly stuck with Bledsoe last year?

1. We would have went goose-egg on that 3 game road trip

2. We would have lost to Indy

3. Tuna would have pulled a Jim Mora Sr and walked before T-Giving

4. We likely wouldn't have won another game the remainder

I thought Bledsoe was fine in '05-but, of course, he has a knack for playing gangbusters in yr 1 of his new team, then fall back to see old ways(i.e. he made the Pro Bowl in yr 1 Buffalo).
 

Parche

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,028
Reaction score
101
TunaFan33;1645489 said:
Ultimately, our kicking game put the nail in our coffin(and Parcells cutting our long snapper, Jeff Robinson, was partly the reason too).

We would have won 2-3 more games if it was decent.

Also true.
 
Top