TunaFan33;1645492 said:Okay-what IF Tuna stubbornly stuck with Bledsoe last year?
1. We would have went goose-egg on that 3 game road trip
2. We would have lost to Indy
3. Tuna would have pulled a Jim Mora Sr and walked before T-Giving
4. We likely wouldn't have won another game the remainder
I thought Bledsoe was fine in '05-but, of course, he has a knack for playing gangbusters in yr 1 of his new team, then fall back to see old ways(i.e. he made the Pro Bowl in yr 1 Buffalo).
lurkercowboy;1645566 said:Is someone actually arguing that we should have kept Bledsoe instead of benching him for Romo? Wow. It was Romo's time. Sean Payton argued for starting Romo in 2005 in fact.
Nors;1645685 said:I read somewhere there was a want to start him as far back as his rookie year over what was in front of him. A lot of speculation -
It's 2007 and Romo is the man.
Ramsey is not intolerable, give him a smidgen of creditCowboyz88;1645717 said:Can't believe I'm responding to such a ridiculous argument, but after a while draft status means squat. The cream must rise to the top, regardless of draft position, or they get released.
Using your draft logic, Tony Romo would be unemployed as we all marvel at the talents of Patrick Ramsey, Heath Shuler and Desmond Howard.
Parche;1645098 said:I looked on Tony´s biography on wikipedia
I agree, but wikipedia is not bad to use for the references at the bottom. Usually, you can go straight to the real source from there.burmafrd;1646590 said:Thats true about Wikipedia= never use if for anything important. Just about anyone can post and edit anything there.
AdamJT13;1646502 said:Never trust Wikipedia. Anything on there might or might not be true.