JohnsKey19
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 19,701
- Reaction score
- 18,731
Do we have the wherewithal financially to sign Hardy to a long term contract without it affecting our ability to re-sign the key young Cowboys(i.e. Frederick, Martin, etc..)?
I initially thought Hardy would be a 1 year rental and I was fine with that. Now, I'm strongly leaning towards trying to re-sign Hardy to a long-term deal. Of course, assuming the team is comfortable that Hardy's issues are behind him. We have some nice young pieces on the DL but not quite enough IMO to let Hardy walk freely out the door. He seems to be a great teammate and embraced the role as a leader. Assuming he returns to even 90% of the player he was in 2013, he's still an elite DL. It's a lot easier to fill out a defense when you're pretty set up front with Hardy, Gregory, Crawford and Lawrence among your top 5-6 DL for a few years.
I initially thought Hardy would be a 1 year rental and I was fine with that. Now, I'm strongly leaning towards trying to re-sign Hardy to a long-term deal. Of course, assuming the team is comfortable that Hardy's issues are behind him. We have some nice young pieces on the DL but not quite enough IMO to let Hardy walk freely out the door. He seems to be a great teammate and embraced the role as a leader. Assuming he returns to even 90% of the player he was in 2013, he's still an elite DL. It's a lot easier to fill out a defense when you're pretty set up front with Hardy, Gregory, Crawford and Lawrence among your top 5-6 DL for a few years.