mr.jameswoods;1911892 said:Who is that? She is smoking!!!
mr.jameswoods;1923517 said:Did anyone watch the last episode? What are your thoughts? This is turning out to be a great series. They are explaining concepts like how the Terminators received their flesh outer covering. They are also expanding on concepts like how the robots can use human body parts and incorporate them in a way. The writing is pretty good too in regards to determining who is a friend or foe. I think this Sara Connor is better than Linda Hamilton. Linda looked a lot tougher but this one is a much better actress. They guy playing John Conner is also a better actor than Edward Furlong was in T2, he is less whiny and doesn't look as if he is reading off lines.
DallasEast;1924140 said:The main reason why I'm watching T|SCC is to see how far Summer Glau, the director/writers AND Fox will take her Terminator character. So far, she's number three on my all-time Terminator model rankings--behind the T-101, T-1000 and ahead of the T-X (Kristanna Loken had Glau beat in the curves competition, but Glau's a better actress imo).
burmafrd;1924121 said:One thing about a TV series is that you have time to flesh out charactors; something you can't do in a 2 hr movie. Linda Hamilton played her role to a T in T2; and she is a fine actress. And she was a LOT tougher. This sarah frankly is to me not tough enough. The T2 sarah was very interesting in that she had no compunction about doing whatever it took; nothing was out of the question; nothing was going too far. Which was perfectly understandable giving the setup as it was.
Sorry, I should have been more specific. I wasn't ranking the actresses, but the characters they are portraying.mr.jameswoods;1925526 said:I can't compare Glau and Loken because they play two different characters. Glau looks like a teenager and Loken looks like a mature woman although technically, they are only 2 years apart. It's hard for me to see Glau as a woman that is 26 years old since she looks like she is barely 16 to me.
CowboyJeff;1952379 said:I'm actually enjoying the show, because I'm not concentrating too much on sticking to the actual Terminator story. It's definitely better than a lot of the other garbage on TV.
You'd have already known that if you'd have read through the whole thread!YoMick;1952389 said:I really like that they have the regular joe FBI guy that is on to "machines & future" and such.... bits an pieces....
Edit
You made me curious as to why... so I googled it
"Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles" (Fox, 2008) - Producer and series adapter Josh Friedman said in an interview with IGN.com that the new series occurs in "an alternate timeline" that "takes the place of 'T3.'" The TV series begins on Aug. 24, 1999, with Sarah (Lena Headey) and a 15-year-old John (Thomas Dekker) living nondescript lives off the grid. They believe they stopped Skynet, which had originally gained sentience in 1997, but now discover they'd simply delayed it.
http://www6.lexisnexis.com/publishe...4&topicId=100019196&docId=l:727672020&start=9
Danny White;1952618 said:You'd have already known that if you'd have read through the whole thread!
:
YoMick;1994881 said:Just watched the finale online.
I still like the show because the possibilities are endless... but the finale sucked.
Not too many chatters on this one huh? LOL
ChldsPlay;1994915 said:Well, it wasn't a true finale, so it's kind of hard to expect too much. Stupid writer's strike.
Rack;1995187 said:I really like the show. It got better as the season went on. I hope it gets picked up for another season (I don't know if that decision has been made yet or not).
BrAinPaiNt;1995601 said:I like it, but I don't see it as something great.
I too wonder if it will be picked up or canceled.
It just seems like one of those shows that could be canceled quickly with many fans crying out over it.