That was the point I was making is that the term is subjective. People are so quick to throw the word around, but everyone could have different definitions. I'm not gonna call Draya a ho, but some poster earlier in this thread did. I counter with if you've had sex at all ever then you're a ho.
With all due respect, if you're going to argue that the term is "subjective" then how can you correct others for using the term as they see fit?
Your argument is based on
your definition. But the implication of your correction is that your definition is applicable to others.
My definition is different than yours. I don't think just because a woman has sex with her boyfriend, and they later break up, that constitutes being a "ho." I would reserve the term for someone who indiscriminately has sex with others outside a committed relationship.
Even so, that's not a term I would use for any woman, whether she met my definition or not. I think the term is very disrespectful to women, particularly because, as DallasEast pointed out, men seem to escape any negatives associated with their *****-hopping ways.