Screw the Rest of the League. Keep Tony

plasticman

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,616
Reaction score
17,757
Only 13 of the 32 NFL team's starting quarterbacks played in all 16 regular season games. Two teams lost their starter before the season even began, including the Dallas Cowboys. They lost Tony Romo shortly after they lost his backup.

Three teams in playoff contention lost their starting quarterback less than a month before the playoffs began. None of them made it past the wildcard round.

72 different quarterbacks started an NFL game in the 2016 season.

Dak Prescott was fortunate to stay healthy and play all 16 games in 2016. Teddy Bridgewater did the same in 2015. In the combined seasons of 2014 and 2015 only 9 quarterbacks started all 32 games. two of them were Derek Carr and Ryan Tannehill.

Injuries happen, we are certainly aware of that. Injuries to your starting quarterback will almost always devastate a team's season. We are certainly aware of that as well.

Suppose Dak Prescott had started his career the same as the average quarterback drafted in the 4th round. He would be either 2nd or 3rd team and might get a handful of snaps assuming Romo and/or his primary backup had stayed healthy. If you were to add up their salaries for 2017 under those circumstances there wouldn't be any difference under the events that really happened. Regardless of who the starter is, that number would have remained the same under either circumstance.

Would a trade of Tony result in better options than a Pro Bowl caliber backup quarterback?

Tony Romo wants to be a starter in this league. Let him prove it. Jason Garrett had stated when he first became HC, competition will be active at all times. Let both quarterbacks compete. The best man will start. They are both competitors. At the very least, it will make them both stronger for the regular season.

This will not divide the team, who will witness the competition first hand. earning your position is always going to be respected by teammates.

There is a far higher probability that both quarterbacks will start games in 2017. it could very well be that Tony room's best opportunity to play in a Super Bowl is the Dallas Cowboys. That possibility increases dramatically with the knowledge that an injury to the most important position on the team will not only be absorbed, Pro Bowl level performance will be consistent.

The Dallas Cowboys are not obligated to surrender Tony Romo. The cap reflects the salary of an elite starter and a player in his 2nd year. We will not have to suffer the feeling of a season lost because a single player went down. And that is a feeling we are certainly aware of.
 

waldoputty

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,375
Reaction score
21,163
Only 13 of the 32 NFL team's starting quarterbacks played in all 16 regular season games. Two teams lost their starter before the season even began, including the Dallas Cowboys. They lost Tony Romo shortly after they lost his backup.

Three teams in playoff contention lost their starting quarterback less than a month before the playoffs began. None of them made it past the wildcard round.

72 different quarterbacks started an NFL game in the 2016 season.

Dak Prescott was fortunate to stay healthy and play all 16 games in 2016. Teddy Bridgewater did the same in 2015. In the combined seasons of 2014 and 2015 only 9 quarterbacks started all 32 games. two of them were Derek Carr and Ryan Tannehill.

Injuries happen, we are certainly aware of that. Injuries to your starting quarterback will almost always devastate a team's season. We are certainly aware of that as well.

Suppose Dak Prescott had started his career the same as the average quarterback drafted in the 4th round. He would be either 2nd or 3rd team and might get a handful of snaps assuming Romo and/or his primary backup had stayed healthy. If you were to add up their salaries for 2017 under those circumstances there wouldn't be any difference under the events that really happened. Regardless of who the starter is, that number would have remained the same under either circumstance.

Would a trade of Tony result in better options than a Pro Bowl caliber backup quarterback?

Tony Romo wants to be a starter in this league. Let him prove it. Jason Garrett had stated when he first became HC, competition will be active at all times. Let both quarterbacks compete. The best man will start. They are both competitors. At the very least, it will make them both stronger for the regular season.

This will not divide the team, who will witness the competition first hand. earning your position is always going to be respected by teammates.

There is a far higher probability that both quarterbacks will start games in 2017. it could very well be that Tony room's best opportunity to play in a Super Bowl is the Dallas Cowboys. That possibility increases dramatically with the knowledge that an injury to the most important position on the team will not only be absorbed, Pro Bowl level performance will be consistent.

The Dallas Cowboys are not obligated to surrender Tony Romo. The cap reflects the salary of an elite starter and a player in his 2nd year. We will not have to suffer the feeling of a season lost because a single player went down. And that is a feeling we are certainly aware of.

i totally agreed as long as tony would be willing.
we have the cap space - lots of it if we want.
 

Nightman

Capologist
Messages
27,121
Reaction score
24,038
Has there ever been a monster truck incapable of being totaled? At the very least, in the shop for an extended period of time?
Call him the Grave Digger

latest
 

Sinister

Well-Known Member
Messages
395
Reaction score
496
I love Tony and wish him nothing but the best, but the NFL is a young mans game. Dak looks like the Quarterback of the future and of right now. Even if Tony wins the starting job, how long before he gets hurt again?

Every single time he goes back to pass I would cringe. I wanted Tony to win the Superbowl with the Cowboys if nothing else just to shut the critics up, but sometimes what we want and what needs to happen are completely at odds.

The fact of the matter is that the Cowboys need to get Tony's salary off the books as quickly as possible, because the Cowboys are going to have a short window when Dak is going to be getting paid peanuts; during this short window the Cowboys can set the stage for the long term.

In the short term will this team be better with Tony, maybe. But the Cowboys can't just look toward next year they have to factor in the cap ramifications for a few years down the road.

Pay that offensive line and build the defense.
 

Melonfeud

I Copy!,,, er,,,I guess,,,ah,,,maybe.
Messages
21,976
Reaction score
33,152
I like what I read and it mirrors my view,,, kinda strange both Carr and tannerhill hammer out two full seasons then the black cloud of bad luck strikes,,,this F.O.should reevaluate it's plans,,, although turning Romo loose on the league with an ax to grind will be fun to watch
 

plasticman

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,616
Reaction score
17,757
Screw ourselves by showing everyone we'll deny a guy a chance elsewhere because we want a security blanket.

People just can't see a step or two down the line. No long game
Yeah....like that's how you win games and championships in this league....sharing the wealth. I'll trade compassion and goodwill points for championships every day.

Super Bowl champions don't win by popular election, they win by putting the best team out there on the field. The odds say that the Cowboys will include Tony Romo on the field at some point in the season.

If "everyone" doesn't like it, then it means the Cowboys made the right decision by keeping him. The object is to make Cowboy fans happy and "everyone" else unhappy.
 

ShiningStar

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,517
Reaction score
7,746
im against the competing because the odds are better Romo is going down again, and if he goes down again, its going to be for a long time. So leave him as back up or coach, and he can come in if Dak goes down. Dak is young and will bounce back, How ever, i dont want to freak people out, players dont get younger, so lets not pass up this opportunity. We have a young exciting QB, you use him.
 

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,482
Reaction score
67,294
I don't know about you people, this thread makes me want to paint my face and run through a brick wall, screaming "ROMO backup!" And then give a self serving sniff as I hitch my pants.
 

DanTanna

Original Zone Member
Messages
4,025
Reaction score
3,298
I want Romo to stay and win a Superbowl here. As a mentor and backup to DAK is fine.
 

AsthmaField

Outta bounds
Messages
26,489
Reaction score
44,544
If you can get decent draft picks for Tony, then you do so. It is that simple.

Dak is the starter for the foreseeable future and to get draft value for Romo would be part of the windfall that results from finding a rookie pro bowl QB in the 4th round.
 

GimmeTheBall!

Junior College Transfer
Messages
37,688
Reaction score
18,038
Only 13 of the 32 NFL team's starting quarterbacks played in all 16 regular season games. Two teams lost their starter before the season even began, including the Dallas Cowboys. They lost Tony Romo shortly after they lost his backup.

Three teams in playoff contention lost their starting quarterback less than a month before the playoffs began. None of them made it past the wildcard round.

72 different quarterbacks started an NFL game in the 2016 season.

Dak Prescott was fortunate to stay healthy and play all 16 games in 2016. Teddy Bridgewater did the same in 2015. In the combined seasons of 2014 and 2015 only 9 quarterbacks started all 32 games. two of them were Derek Carr and Ryan Tannehill.

Injuries happen, we are certainly aware of that. Injuries to your starting quarterback will almost always devastate a team's season. We are certainly aware of that as well.

Suppose Dak Prescott had started his career the same as the average quarterback drafted in the 4th round. He would be either 2nd or 3rd team and might get a handful of snaps assuming Romo and/or his primary backup had stayed healthy. If you were to add up their salaries for 2017 under those circumstances there wouldn't be any difference under the events that really happened. Regardless of who the starter is, that number would have remained the same under either circumstance.

Would a trade of Tony result in better options than a Pro Bowl caliber backup quarterback?

Tony Romo wants to be a starter in this league. Let him prove it. Jason Garrett had stated when he first became HC, competition will be active at all times. Let both quarterbacks compete. The best man will start. They are both competitors. At the very least, it will make them both stronger for the regular season.

This will not divide the team, who will witness the competition first hand. earning your position is always going to be respected by teammates.

There is a far higher probability that both quarterbacks will start games in 2017. it could very well be that Tony room's best opportunity to play in a Super Bowl is the Dallas Cowboys. That possibility increases dramatically with the knowledge that an injury to the most important position on the team will not only be absorbed, Pro Bowl level performance will be consistent.

The Dallas Cowboys are not obligated to surrender Tony Romo. The cap reflects the salary of an elite starter and a player in his 2nd year. We will not have to suffer the feeling of a season lost because a single player went down. And that is a feeling we are certainly aware of.

That's the spirit, bloke!
11 years with Romo magic is not enough. 2 PLAYOFF WINS IN 11 YEARS!
NOW, WHEN THE DYNAMIC DAK IS HERE, WE WANT A BRITTLE AGED ROMO??
MAKES SENSE TO ME, CHAPS!
:laugh:
 
Top