TheMarathonContinues
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 75,460
- Reaction score
- 69,894
This is the same question I asked about the Pats corner with 9’pick rated low.How does someone get 9 sacks but still get a 56.3 grade on PFF?
This is the same question I asked about the Pats corner with 9’pick rated low.How does someone get 9 sacks but still get a 56.3 grade on PFF?
No.
I'm just smart enough to know we need both.
We need both.People want a 1T so badly that they keep mistaking 3T for 1T.
Because that’s only 9 plays. PFF grades each play on a + or - type of scale. For a DT a sack and just filling your gap/letting a LB make a play is a very similar grade. Their system rewards consistency over flash. If that’s the best way to grade is very much up for debate.How does someone get 9 sacks but still get a 56.3 grade on PFF?
People want a 1T so badly that they keep mistaking 3T for 1T.
We've invested pretty deeply in 3T
LolPeople want a 1T so badly that they keep mistaking 3T for 1T.
And when you have done that without results, who cares?We've invested pretty deeply in 3T
He knows which fiddle to play.....You probably got 20k likes this off season, what's not to like.
Thats about right, but I have seen some directional motivation at least they have recognized finally the glaring hole.And when you have done that without results, who cares?
This is how a team stays bad.
They refuse to move on from personnel mistakes.
They sit around and stress "patience".
This is the same question I asked about the Pats corner with 9’pick rated low.
And not one of those was cause he said something positiveYou probably got 20k likes this off season, what's not to like.
What movement?Thats about right, but I have seen some directional motivation at least they have recognized finally the glaring hole.