Senior Bowl Chatter....

[KingintheNorth]

Thanks. Haven't shot sports for a while so I was a little rusty. It was good practice.

Picture 103 is horrible. Shame on you for ruining an otherwise outstanding gallery.

 

[KingintheNorth]

Great looking photos. Very nice.

You ain't that hot with a keyboard and computer either.

 

[Alexander]

Picture 103 is horrible. Shame on you for ruining an otherwise outstanding gallery.

{opens picture}

 

[Risen Star]

https://jdjohnston1960.smugmug.com/Senior-Bowl-2016/

Really good work, bro. Thank you.

 

[Silver Surfer]

Thank you for these photos, great job!

What type of gear are you using?

These pictures are of excellent quality!

Canon 7D2 and 70-200mm/f2.8 - The 7D2's images aren't as nice as Canon's top of the line cameras, but its very fast. Good for sports. Thanks.

 

[Silver Surfer]

Picture 103 is horrible. Shame on you for ruining an otherwise outstanding gallery.

You don't like sad-faced Mickey?

My favorite is #18.

 

[texbumthelife]

Picture 103 is horrible. Shame on you for ruining an otherwise outstanding gallery.

I don't know man, picture 2 terrifies me...

 

[Sydla]

http://football.realgm.com/analysis/2762/Senior-Bowl-Notebook-Wednesday

I can't think of a worse pick at 4 than Elliott. Maybe if we decided to take a TE at 4.

 

[texbumthelife]

Nassib has tremendous bend around the corner. I am liking that guy more and more.

Why is Hogan always looking at his arm and/or the ball when he throws? Get your eyes downfield. See where you want the ball to go.

 

[texbumthelife]

I can't think of a worse pick at 4 than Elliott. Maybe if we decided to take a TE at 4.

RB's don't carry value like they used to, but there aren't five better football players in this draft than Elliott.

 

[JBS]

Wentz going #2 might be the absolute best case scenario

 

[KingintheNorth]

Wentz going #2 might be the absolute best case scenario

Preach.

 

[Sydla]

RB's don't carry value like they used to, but there aren't five better football players in this draft than Elliott.

Well part of my thinking that Elliott at 4 would be simply value. Taking a RB at 4 isn't getting the true value of that pick, especially when it appears likely that no one would touch Elliott in the Top Ten.

 

[Risen Star]

Well part of my thinking that Elliott at 4 would be simply value. Taking a RB at 4 isn't getting the true value of that pick, especially when it appears likely that no one would touch Elliott in the Top Ten.

I would not be surprised at all if the Giants took him at 10.

 

[texbumthelife]

Well part of my thinking that Elliott at 4 would be simply value. Taking a RB at 4 isn't getting the true value of that pick, especially when it appears likely that no one would touch Elliott in the Top Ten.

Oh I agree with that viewpoint. I wasn't arguing with you. Just saying, the pick would likely ruffle some feathers but I don't think anyone would question it come Sundays.

 

[Sydla]

I would not be surprised at all if the Giants took him at 10.

With the defensive problems they have, no chance in hell they take Elliott at 10.

 

[Risen Star]

It's tough to evaluate the two teams considering the vast discrepancy in the quality of coaching they're getting. You basically have to project how much these South players would improve after a week with Garrett.

 

[Risen Star]

With the defensive problems they have, no chance in hell they take Elliott at 10.

Disagree. We shall see.

You take talent in the draft. At least the well run teams do.

 

[Manwiththeplan]

I would not be surprised at all if the Giants took him at 10.

Given that JPP may never be the dominant player he was, I think they'll take Shaq Lawson if he's available. If not him they could opt for Noah Spence

 

[Manwiththeplan]

Disagree. We shall see.

You take talent in the draft. At least the well run teams do.

Is Elliot that much of a talent? More so than the two guys I mentioned?