PA Cowboy Fan
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 25,354
- Reaction score
- 51,350
I give it a week more of futility, two at most. We should be mathematically out of it by then and they can stop with the charade.
Not with the way this division is going.
I give it a week more of futility, two at most. We should be mathematically out of it by then and they can stop with the charade.
Not with the way this division is going.
I give it a week more of futility, two at most. We should be mathematically out of it by then and they can stop with the charade.
Can we still be in it in two weeks with 10 losses?
When is a #1 EVER not a good thing? I am trying to understand what you're saying but it makes no sense to me.
Just because this team isn't really a 3-13 club when healthy, doesn't mean they couldn't benefit tremendously from a very high draft pick.
Edit: are you simply advocating a trade down? Because it reads kind of confusing.
Look out Free...
Yeah maybe its convoluted logic I'm using, but here goes. Since 2012, there hasn't been a consensus #1 pick. I don't consider Clowney anything but a freak, a lot of teams were afraid of exactly how he's turned out. The last 3 teams have looked at trading down from #1 but haven't been able to, so went with who they thought was their guy, and it hasn't worked out for any of them except maybe Winston. Yet last year I don't think (could be wrong) anyone was in a panic, because since there were 2 QB's there was a possibility to trade up and grab the second when the first was off the board. Much more optionality at #2 -5 to trade OR get value for your pick.
The #1 pick this year will most likely be a QB, and its looking like a 2 horse race. So no one will want to give up a kings ransom unless one of these guys turns into Andrew Luck by the draft (I'm betting they won't).
I'm basing all of this on the fact that we won't take a QB in the first (to sit on the bench for 3 years of a 4 year deal isn't much value) so we would have to pick the best player otherwise. I'm not saying #1 is a BAD place to be, I just think we get more value and optionality from a non-QB at a slightly lower pick.
Not happening. They think they're still in it. They aren't about to start a rookie at RT without even a training camp under his belt.
If we pick #1 then we take Joey Bosa. He is the best player in this draft by a sizable margin. You take him and never look back.
No, ideally we would get one of the top 3 defensive players (looking like DE and 2 DBs). But if not, we can get a significant pick from a trade. Maybe I'm wrong and Paxton Lynch becomes coveted and someone will give a ton for #1, but it hasn't happened recently.
Joey Bosa is the #1 defensive player, the #1 defensive end and the #1 overall talent in the draft.
I don't know why people want to see Moore so much. I would give him about a quarter and people are clawing their eyes out wondering why he is even in the league. Even his preseason games looked pedestrian.
I don't know why people want to see Moore so much. I would give him about a quarter and people are clawing their eyes out wondering why he is even in the league. Even his preseason games looked pedestrian.
I don't know. Maybe if we beat the Deadskins as crazy as that is and the Giants and Eagles both lose. we'll be one game out next week.
Joey Bosa is the #1 defensive player, the #1 defensive end and the #1 overall talent in the draft.
We take a db that early I might snap!!
Joey Bosa is the #1 defensive player, the #1 defensive end and the #1 overall talent in the draft.
I'm not sure that's set in stone. I'm not going 3-13 for Lattimer from the Program. We'll just have to disagree, but if our front office agrees with you, then they can lose out and tell me to stick my strategy in the mud.
What part are you in disagreement with?