Glad to here but that still doesn’t mean they are the best running team in the nfl. At no point did it feel like the bears had a chance to win that game on Sunday. If that was the browns the outcome would have been different.
Why would it have been different if it had been the Browns? What difference would it make if the 200 rushing yards were from the Browns or Bears?
I would disagree on the comment there was no point the Bears seemed in it. Certainly at 23-28 they had to be considered in it. But even so, being the best running team in the NFL doesn't automatically mean a team will always seem in it. The Browns you are talking about never seemed in it against the Patriots.
In any case, like it or not the Bears are gaining 22 yards per game and .3 yards per carry more on the ground than the Browns.
But even if you want to discount that, so what? Even if the Cowboys beat the 2nd or 3rd best running team in the NFL it still goes against the OP's assertion they can't beat a top running team.