PAPPYDOG
There are no Dak haters just Cowboy lovers!!!
- Messages
- 20,642
- Reaction score
- 35,544
Not yet but I like what he's showing so far.................pollard needs to step it up.
Not yet but I like what he's showing so far.................pollard needs to step it up.
I'm sorry, what are you trying to say? Pollard had 15 carries for a measly 55 yards. Dowdle averaged almost twice the ypa at 6.6 for 79yds (Pollard 3.7), and Pollard's was inflated a little because of 1 long(-ish) run of ~12 yards (I think). I'm certainly not making the case for Dowdle to be elevated up the depth chart, but I did, in fact, watch the game, and the Giants defense struggled to get Dowdle to the ground, while Pollard was getting dragged down by one arm from behind by LBs.The blocking was there because, as you said, it was the Giants.
You apparently saw a different game than I did....
Something is wrong. Either he has angered the staff or the owner. Or he don’t know the playbook. He has 3 carrys for 14 yards and 1 TD. The TD was a run from the 4 yard line. And we are having problem on the goal line. I dont get it.I wish they'd give Luepke a chance to prove what he can do, and he has the size for it. Give the guy a shot at it for Pete's sake. We had the perfect opportunity in the 4th qtr of that Giants game to take a look at a couple rooks or so but they wouldn't do it!
I wonder if he is afraid of getting injured again.He should get more carries,it will also improve Pollards performance since it’s clear he isnt a bell cow RB.
You don't even get that you don't get it.Philly doesn't win because of their running backs lol. And McCaffrey is good because of his versatility. Nobody cares about Elijah mitchell. Funny post
Yes, teams that stockpile rbs like kc, Tampa. Philly having gainwell and miles Sanders is stockpiling. You got it buddyYou don't even get that you don't get it.
Yes you missed my point, perhaps I wasn't clear.I'm sorry, what are you trying to say? Pollard had 15 carries for a measly 55 yards. Dowdle averaged almost twice the ypa at 6.6 for 79yds (Pollard 3.7), and Pollard's was inflated a little because of 1 long(-ish) run of ~12 yards (I think). I'm certainly not making the case for Dowdle to be elevated up the depth chart, but I did, in fact, watch the game, and the Giants defense struggled to get Dowdle to the ground, while Pollard was getting dragged down by one arm from behind by LBs.
Are you trying to say that our run game is adequate? If that's the case, we disagree. Passing attacks have more success against good defenses when they have to concern themselves with the run. We just don't possess that threat.
Or did I miss the point entirely?
Tony has lost that elite speed.Yes you missed my point, perhaps I wasn't clear.
Pollard struggled in the last game for the same (mostly) reason Zeke struggled last year - he was the lead back, teams key their defense on the lead back (again, mostly). Last year Zeke was that guy, Pollard was more successful last year because he wasn't the lead back.
This year Pollard is the lead back, ergo, Dowdle, since he isn't being keyed on, is more effective. The lead back won't be very successful unless there is adequte blocking. As I posted earlier, just check out Emmitt's ypc stats, after Stepnoski, Gogan (if memory serves, could have been another o-lineman) left, and the blocking just wasn't as good.
The backs that can consistently get great yardage and tds without very good blocking are rare, the Barry Sanders type, for example...
Gotta have better o-line play for the running game to work...
I don't think our O-line is weak. Every site that ranks O-lines (that I've looked at) has ours in the Top 10, with at least one having us ranked 2nd behind Philly (not that I'm buying that, but it's where Football Guys has us). Zeke struggled, and I hate to say this because I like Zeke, because he's finished as an RB. I've been watching Pollard since he was at Memphis. He's slower now and is easy to tackle, just as he's always been. Dowdle is JAG I think, but he can prove me wrong anytime he wants. We don't have a back that inflicts punishment on tacklers, and there are plenty in the NFL that do.Yes you missed my point, perhaps I wasn't clear.
Pollard struggled in the last game for the same (mostly) reason Zeke struggled last year - he was the lead back, teams key their defense on the lead back (again, mostly). Last year Zeke was that guy, Pollard was more successful last year because he wasn't the lead back.
This year Pollard is the lead back, ergo, Dowdle, since he isn't being keyed on, is more effective. The lead back won't be very successful unless there is adequte blocking. As I posted earlier, just check out Emmitt's ypc stats, after Stepnoski, Gogan (if memory serves, could have been another o-lineman) left, and the blocking just wasn't as good.
The backs that can consistently get great yardage and t without very good blocking are rare, the Barry Sanders type, for example...
Gotta have better o-line play for the running game to work...
A bit weak, I just think the o-line is the bigger issue.I I just think the RB position is a weak link for us
4.52 at the combine, that's not elite speed. Did have a 4.37 at Memphis' pro day, but teams are notorious for having their players run better at home, there's all kinds of tricks teams can do to improve their players run faster.Tony has lost that elite speed.
And Pollard isn’t a $10 million starting RBNo. Dowdle is a borderline 3rd HB. He wouldn't have made most rosters
At what position? When Smith is healthy, LT is covered. Smith at LG has done a great job and, at just 22, will be with us for many years. Biadasz is only 25 and is handling C duties fine. Martin at RG is obviously not an issue, which leaves Steele at RT. He’s not a bum, but an upgrade would be fine with me.A bit weak, I just think the o-line is the bigger issue.
It’s funny how even CZ posters know how to use clickbait . Cracks me up!!!pollard needs to step it up.