- Messages
- 112,935
- Reaction score
- 144,661
No. He is playing the hand he was dealt. Yes they are really bad but like Collinsworth said last night, they isn't much else he can do.Should Eberflus be fired?
No. He is playing the hand he was dealt. Yes they are really bad but like Collinsworth said last night, they isn't much else he can do.Should Eberflus be fired?
He bought into his boy Sanborn. How is that working out??Eberflush doesn't bring in players. He has nothing to do with the lack of talent. This has Jerry and Son all over it. This is Football 101.
Now, if you want to talk about how putrid Eberflush is in regards to schemes and actually getting players to play, I totally agree. But after the Joneses actually make things right again with the roster
That is a lot of ifsI hate to say it, but yeah.
I see a world with Overshown back and healthy. Diggs/Bland being healthier and Revel coming in later in the season. People want to talk about Diggs/Bland and they’ve been burned plenty this year, but a lot of the time they’re not off by a lot. Diggs doesn’t move like he’s completely washed imo and Bland literally just looks like he’s fighting pain every snap. And if the edge rushers figure it out…Houston plays more, Clowney fits in, maybe the rookie and Kneeland improve. Sam Williams is most useful at containing RB’s and fast QB’s
What good would that do?Our bye is November 10th. If it still looks like *** by then, yes.
You have to have the players (secondary)The question surely needs to be considered by the Cowboys. We as fans have no insight into how he’s doing other than the results on the field which have been abysmal. Is it mostly coaching or is it mostly the players? Without being there every day with the team and observing first hand, we as fans have no idea how he is with the players.
I’d be interesting to hear @Ranching thoughts on the topic.
Give the next DC a full~ 2 weeks to prepare.What good would that do?
The defense didn't play better Jazz. They gave up almost 500 yds AGAIN. They allowed 40 points AGAIN. They gave up more than 4 explosive plays in a game AGAIN. Personnel changes didn't happen AGAIN. They were unable to make critical stops AGAIN. The fact that our offense played WAAAY better than anyone expected is the only thing that washes some of the stink off. If the score had been 40-9 like most of the country thought, would you still think they played better? I don't think so. We have other pieces to put in on defense. I have seen other posters say that the coaches know more than us, but I submit that they can't play any worse, so why not at least take a look?The defense played better against GB, a team that everyone, including 98% on here would throttle us.
Or did they play better?
The pass rush was better, but GB was missing a starter, or was it 2 starters on the OL. Did that make a difference or not. Hard to say. We were missing a few as well. Dak had good protection. But that has nothing to do with our defense.
They secondary gave of a long pass, so that seemed to be improved. However not stopping 3rd down plays really hurt them. And the stupid penalties all night long, on both sides of the ball.
I am not saying he should get a reprieve, but it is also too early to fire him.
We all knew it would take half the season to truly see how this team was going to look.
There are also injuries to deal with. However, this defense still should have been playing better.The
yes he needs to be gone. A great performance by the offense last night was semi-wasted because of this guy's defense.The question surely needs to be considered by the Cowboys. We as fans have no insight into how he’s doing other than the results on the field which have been abysmal. Is it mostly coaching or is it mostly the players? Without being there every day with the team and observing first hand, we as fans have no idea how he is with the players.
I’d be interesting to hear @Ranching thoughts on the topic.
I agree but disagree.No. He is playing the hand he was dealt. Yes they are really bad but like Collinsworth said last night, they isn't much else he can do.
.....looks like Sanborn is an Eberflus-friendly addition, coming from Chicago too. Hmmm.He should start by changing pieces like Sanborn.
Yes I can. These players might be worse, but Eberfalse is a proven loser. At least Quinn had done some good things before coming here.Can't make this conclusion w/o comparing players from each squad.
No doubt. But it’s either that or we’re a bottom 5 team this yearThat is a lot of ifs
DweeberGoof.The "not much to work with" excuse don't fly. Quinn turned trash into diamonds. Eberfalse has to go.
The defense played better against GB, a team that everyone, including 98% on here would throttle us.
Or did they play better?
The pass rush was better, but GB was missing a starter, or was it 2 starters on the OL. Did that make a difference or not. Hard to say. We were missing a few as well. Dak had good protection. But that has nothing to do with our defense.
They secondary gave of a long pass, so that seemed to be improved. However not stopping 3rd down plays really hurt them. And the stupid penalties all night long, on both sides of the ball.
I am not saying he should get a reprieve, but it is also too early to fire him.
We all knew it would take half the season to truly see how this team was going to look.
There are also injuries to deal with. However, this defense still should have been playing better.
| 1st Downs | 32 | 26 |
| Passing 1st downs | 16 | 17 |
| Rushing 1st downs | 11 | 8 |
| 1st downs from penalties | 5 | 1 |
| 3rd down efficiency | 10-14 | 4-11 |
| 4th down efficiency | 1-1 | 1-1 |
| Total Plays | 79 | 67 |
| Total Yards | 489 | 436 |
| Total Drives | 11 | 10 |
| Yards per Play | 6.2 | 6.5 |
| Passing | 325 | 319 |
| Comp/Att | 31/43 | 31/40 |
| Yards per pass | 7.4 | 7.8 |
| Interceptions thrown | 0 | 0 |
| Sacks-Yards Lost | 1-12 | 1-0 |
| Rushing | 164 | 117 |
| Rushing Attempts | 35 | 26 |
| Yards per rush | 4.7 | 4.5 |
| Red Zone (Made-Att) | 5-6 | 4-5 |
| Penalties | 7-53 | 11-95 |
| Turnovers | 1 | 0 |
| Fumbles lost | 1 | 0 |
| Interceptions thrown | 0 | 0 |
| Defensive / Special Teams TDs | 0 | 0 |
| Possession | 35:33 | 34:27 |
That was why I asked ... or did they .....The defense didn't play better Jazz. They gave up almost 500 yds AGAIN. They allowed 40 points AGAIN. They gave up more than 4 explosive plays in a game AGAIN. Personnel changes didn't happen AGAIN. They were unable to make critical stops AGAIN. The fact that our offense played WAAAY better than anyone expected is the only thing that washes some of the stink off. If the score had been 40-9 like most of the country thought, would you still think they played better? I don't think so. We have other pieces to put in on defense. I have seen other posters say that the coaches know more than us, but I submit that they can't play any worse, so why not at least take a look?
It was not what I meant. I should have worded it differently.
1st Downs 32 26 Passing 1st downs 16 17 Rushing 1st downs 11 8 1st downs from penalties 5 1 3rd down efficiency 10-14 4-11 4th down efficiency 1-1 1-1 Total Plays 79 67 Total Yards 489 436 Total Drives 11 10 Yards per Play 6.2 6.5 Passing 325 319 Comp/Att 31/43 31/40 Yards per pass 7.4 7.8 Interceptions thrown 0 0 Sacks-Yards Lost 1-12 1-0 Rushing 164 117 Rushing Attempts 35 26 Yards per rush 4.7 4.5 Red Zone (Made-Att) 5-6 4-5 Penalties 7-53 11-95 Turnovers 1 0 Fumbles lost 1 0 Interceptions thrown 0 0 Defensive / Special Teams TDs 0 0 Possession 35:33 34:27
you really want to claim this was better?
