xwalker
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 57,240
- Reaction score
- 64,763
Did you read my OP?Cook has been hurt for the majority of his career lol.
I clearly stated that he had been injured.
Keep up the dumb arse comments and you get the ignore button.
Did you read my OP?Cook has been hurt for the majority of his career lol.
No. Don't ever draft a RB high. 3rd Rd or later.The Cowboys had pick #28 and #60 for the 1st and 2nd rounds respectively in 2017.
Dalvin Cook was drafted at #41.
I posted back then that if he dropped to #60 that the Cowboys should definitely draft him.
I also said that they should consider him at #28 or with a trade down from #28 or trade up from #60.
Most replies were that it was not a good idea and would be over-kill at the RB position. People also said the RB position is not valuable.
Cook had injury issues his first 2 seasons; however, just based on talent it would have been a good move in retrospect.
A healthy Cook coming into this season would have meant either the Cowboys would let Zeke holdout OR Zeke would not have held out.
Cook's speed/explosiveness looks better than Saquan Barkley to me...
The Cowboys drafted Taco at #28 that year...
Who would or would not have drafted Cook?
TJ Watt should have been the pick.
No we should not have drafted Cook. We should not draft RBs in the first round.
In hindsight, yes - Cook would have been the better choice.The Cowboys had pick #28 and #60 for the 1st and 2nd rounds respectively in 2017.
Dalvin Cook was drafted at #41.
I posted back then that if he dropped to #60 that the Cowboys should definitely draft him.
I also said that they should consider him at #28 or with a trade down from #28 or trade up from #60.
Most replies were that it was not a good idea and would be over-kill at the RB position. People also said the RB position is not valuable.
Cook had injury issues his first 2 seasons; however, just based on talent it would have been a good move in retrospect.
A healthy Cook coming into this season would have meant either the Cowboys would let Zeke holdout OR Zeke would not have held out.
Cook's speed/explosiveness looks better than Saquan Barkley to me...
The Cowboys drafted Taco at #28 that year...
Who would or would not have drafted Cook?
That concept has been debated many times.No. Don't ever draft a RB high. 3rd Rd or later.
With a trade up from #60?No they should have drafted TJ Watt.
I wouldnt draft any RB's in the first round unless it was the final piece to the puzzle. 2nd round and lower for me.
Keep them around for 4 years and then recycle.
If, and, but...shoulda-coulda-woulda.The Cowboys had pick #28 and #60 for the 1st and 2nd rounds respectively in 2017.
Dalvin Cook was drafted at #41.
I posted back then that if he dropped to #60 that the Cowboys should definitely draft him.
I also said that they should consider him at #28 or with a trade down from #28 or trade up from #60.
Most replies were that it was not a good idea and would be over-kill at the RB position. People also said the RB position is not valuable.
Cook had injury issues his first 2 seasons; however, just based on talent it would have been a good move in retrospect.
A healthy Cook coming into this season would have meant either the Cowboys would let Zeke holdout OR Zeke would not have held out.
Cook's speed/explosiveness looks better than Saquan Barkley to me...
The Cowboys drafted Taco at #28 that year...
Who would or would not have drafted Cook?
Don't buy into these guys nonsense.Hey, Zeke might have had an atrocious game but he is not a trash player. He will get it together.
With the benefit of hindsight, sure I would take Cook over Taco. That's a no brainer. At the time, however, I think it was a fair argument that we had needs other than RB.
If, and, but...shoulda-coulda-woulda.
That ship has sailed, and is way over the horizon at this point.
The Cowboys had pick #28 and #60 for the 1st and 2nd rounds respectively in 2017.
Dalvin Cook was drafted at #41.
I posted back then that if he dropped to #60 that the Cowboys should definitely draft him.
I also said that they should consider him at #28 or with a trade down from #28 or trade up from #60.
Most replies were that it was not a good idea and would be over-kill at the RB position. People also said the RB position is not valuable.
Cook had injury issues his first 2 seasons; however, just based on talent it would have been a good move in retrospect.
A healthy Cook coming into this season would have meant either the Cowboys would let Zeke holdout OR Zeke would not have held out.
Cook's speed/explosiveness looks better than Saquan Barkley to me...
The Cowboys drafted Taco at #28 that year...
Who would or would not have drafted Cook?
My question is not specific to the fact that Taco was a bust.
At the time, there were less questions about Cook's talent than several players drafted before him.
Also, my question involved the concept of trading down from #28 or up from #60 to draft Cook.
In the past several years, when the Cowboys are "sold" on a player that they draft, it most often turns out well.
They debated between Taco and a couple of other players (Watt and a DB). That's the opposite of being "sold" on Taco.
They were "sold" on Zack Martin and Tyron Smith when they were drafted. They were "sold" on Frederick as a player with the only question of how long they could wait before he would be gone.
They debated about the Trysten Hill pick meaning they were not universally "sold" on him.
The issue is he would never have seen the field. There is a thought to have a bell cow here and you cant have two RBs on the field at the same time (a la NO, SF). you would have probably seen cook get 30 carries a year and be deemed a bust after 2 years and likely be right where we are now with Zeke.The Cowboys had pick #28 and #60 for the 1st and 2nd rounds respectively in 2017.
Dalvin Cook was drafted at #41.
I posted back then that if he dropped to #60 that the Cowboys should definitely draft him.
I also said that they should consider him at #28 or with a trade down from #28 or trade up from #60.
Most replies were that it was not a good idea and would be over-kill at the RB position. People also said the RB position is not valuable.
Cook had injury issues his first 2 seasons; however, just based on talent it would have been a good move in retrospect.
A healthy Cook coming into this season would have meant either the Cowboys would let Zeke holdout OR Zeke would not have held out.
Cook's speed/explosiveness looks better than Saquan Barkley to me...
The Cowboys drafted Taco at #28 that year...
Who would or would not have drafted Cook?
Hey guys!
I’m sending a care package of cookies to xwalker.
He’s apparently been dying for some.
Assuming future decisions involve similar situations and parameters, I would agree.No, previous decisions or non-decisions provide data points for making future decisions.
NO they shouldnt have , he being injured the first 2 seasons is why.. EE in the meantime was winning rushing titles and leading the league in rushing.. he will be top 5 this season.. lets see how the wheels come off cook when the injuries slow him down and hes 2 years behind zeke..BTW he will be up for new deal as well.. its chasing your tail concepts lading from a bad case of hindsight..The Cowboys had pick #28 and #60 for the 1st and 2nd rounds respectively in 2017.
Dalvin Cook was drafted at #41.
I posted back then that if he dropped to #60 that the Cowboys should definitely draft him.
I also said that they should consider him at #28 or with a trade down from #28 or trade up from #60.
Most replies were that it was not a good idea and would be over-kill at the RB position. People also said the RB position is not valuable.
Cook had injury issues his first 2 seasons; however, just based on talent it would have been a good move in retrospect.
A healthy Cook coming into this season would have meant either the Cowboys would let Zeke holdout OR Zeke would not have held out.
Cook's speed/explosiveness looks better than Saquan Barkley to me...
The Cowboys drafted Taco at #28 that year...
Who would or would not have drafted Cook?