KB1122
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 3,154
- Reaction score
- 1,447
jim mcmahon is the best qb they ever had.
Sid Luckman and Johnny Lujack beg to differ.
jim mcmahon is the best qb they ever had.
Tsaying.They could have had Brady.They could’ve had Fitzpatrick...
you are so naughty anymore. You need to knock off the air fryer.Oh, I so hope it was the latter.
not really they are about even ones better at protecting the ball but the other takes more chances and makes bigger plays yet turns it over more , in the end they are lower fringe starters ie backups etc..its ironic bears fans are mad he is their starter as of now yet fans here were upset he was our backup..lolDalton is better than Fitz and light years better than any QB they have had in a long while.
We have the same results. So.........And yet there's still Cowboys fans that think he was just as good as Dak.
We have the same results. So.........
He was not even average. He’s an ok backup, but not starter material anymore if he ever was.Dalton had good numbers after this return from injury. He's a legitimate starter, and only costs 10mil. The Bears got a good deal.
People are so short sighted when it comes to cap. Dalton is a decent starter and frees up cap to improve the rest of the team.
They could’ve had Fitzpatrick...
They do...Dak and Andy are the same guy according to Dak HatersTsaying.They could have had Brady.
He was not even average. He’s an ok backup, but not starter material anymore if he ever was.
After coming back from injury, Dalton's QB rating was 2 points behind Dak.
Dalton's BadThrow% and OnTarget% is 10/11th best in the league. That's a starter.
https://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2020/passing_advanced.htm
You have to be kidding me if you think Dalton is as good as Dak. Not even close.After coming back from injury, Dalton's QB rating was 2 points behind Dak.
Dalton's BadThrow% and OnTarget% is 10/11th best in the league. That's a starter.
https://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2020/passing_advanced.htm
Which is basically asking if you want runny poo or chunky poo for dinner.
Neither is great. Fitz might have a little better output but he’s a complete liability at any moment. Dude ain’t afraid to turn it over multiple times per game.
Tsaying.They could have had Brady.
I didn't say crap about the offense. But since you mentioned it...Dak had a lot of turnovers before he went down. Might want to refresh yourself on it.Yep the offense was just as good without Dak as with him..... oh wait...
I didn't say crap about the offense. But since you mentioned it...Dak had a lot of turnovers before he went down. Might want to refresh yourself on it.
I didn't say that either. I didn't 'act like.." anything. I made a simple general statement and you are trying to pin some agenda on me. Insulting.I did refresh on that and you are still wrong. Then again you started off with acting like the defense giving up 40 points was a Dak problem so I know what I am getting into. Dak's INT % was right around where it always has been, 1.8% last year, and he had 9 TDs, 4 INTs and 1856 yards in about 4.5 games which is why the offense was on record breaking pace and suddenly fell off a cliff the game after he went down (remarkable coincidence I am sure).
We have the same results. So.........