Look. There are times when it's clear (if you're paying attention to the ends) they are attempting to get pressure and there are times when it is clear they are not trying to get pressure. Some people complain about them not getting pressure in the latter situation. In that situation it's wrong to blame the player. I'm just trying to point that out.superpunk;1266253 said:So Zimmer sends them out with instructions to get dominated?
jk....The blame goes both ways. This thread isn't about coaching though. I can't make excuses for players who rarely win their individual matchups, and rarely create pressure.
theogt;1266328 said:Look. There are times when it's clear (if you're paying attention to the ends) they are attempting to get pressure and there are times when it is clear they are not trying to get pressure. Some people complain about them not getting pressure in the latter situation. That's wrong, and I'm just pointing that out.
No. It's the case just about every week.wileedog;1266337 said:The only times I think this might be is the games we played against Vince and Vick, where we were worried more about containment then pressure.
Again, given Bill's weekly rant about the pass rush, I can't believe he or Zimmer are telling those two to go out there and just hold their ground on pass plays.
theogt;1266339 said:No. It's the case just about every week.
theogt;1266219 said:You haven't been watching, then. Ware's INT two weeks ago was because of pressure by Canty.
Bill was harping on them during the middle of the season. I don't know if it was about pass-rush, run defense, taking plays off, missing tackles, blowing an assignment, or what.wileedog;1266347 said:So explain to me why Bill is harping on those two and the pass rush if they are just doing what he tells them to do?
theogt;1266328 said:Look. There are times when it's clear (if you're paying attention to the ends) they are attempting to get pressure and there are times when it is clear they are not trying to get pressure. Some people complain about them not getting pressure in the latter situation. In that situation it's wrong to blame the player. I'm just trying to point that out.
superpunk;1266358 said:1. They're playing the run first - in our two-gap defense, that is correct. But, they're not quick enough in recognition to get after the QB - and, once they do, they are entirely ineffective.
superpunk;1266358 said:That ain't me. If they're playing off like that, there are a few options -
1. They're playing the run first - in our two-gap defense, that is correct. But, they're not quick enough in recognition to get after the QB - and, once they do, they are entirely ineffective.
2. They're playing contain on a mobile QB.
3. They're being instructed to be ineffective. Then, the coach can moan about them during the week, for doing what they're told.
My money's on #1. It's a tough defense for young guys to get comfortable in. They deserve time. But right now, they are pretty dreadful, regardless of explanation.
Then why did Canty complain about their job being to just sit put and not rush the QB?wileedog;1266365 said:Makes a heck of a lot more sense then Bill saying "don't rush the QB" then complaining week after week that we aren't getting pressure.
theogt;1266386 said:Then why did Canty complain about their job being to just sit put and not rush the QB?
Was he lying?
Is he cancer trying to get Zimmer fired?
MissionCoach;1266140 said:We all remember the infamous BP quote ... “If they're going to ask you to cook the meal, they ought to let you buy the groceries.”
Well Parcells has been buying the groceries here in Dallas since he became the Head Coach in 2003.
Other than the TOmatoes for the salad...it appears that Big Bill has done most, if not all of the grocery shopping.
I think it would be safe to say with the players he has brought in, that the team is at least respectable now...or at least had been prior to the NO and Philly debacles.
Many fans seem to think that the problem with this team is the coaches, the playcalling and the schemes...
Curious what ya'll think of the groceries that BP has bought over the past few years???
So he was lying.wileedog;1266390 said:What would you say if every week everyone was asking you why you have no sacks, no pressure, and haven't sniffed a QB all year?
"I stink?"
theogt;1266395 said:So he was lying.
wileedog;1266421 said:No, misinterpreted.
I agree with what Superpunk said - we play a read and react scheme, we always have under Zimmer even before Parcells and the 3-4. I do agree that Zimmer and Parcells are telling them to play the run first.
What I don't agree with and what makes absolutely no sense to me is that the HC who is constantly talking about lack of a pass rush is telling his two DEs to never rush the passer, and just contain their gaps even when the QB takes a 7 step drop.
Its a heck of a lot more logical that these guys are 2nd year players who aren't recognizing plays fast enough, and when they do they don't seem to be able to beat their man and generate pressure very much.
Canty wasn't known for his pass rushing in college, and Spears had the tag of a player who took plays off. I think both will get better, but giving them a pass because supposedly their coach told them not to go after the QB is absurd.
Doomsday;1266435 said:I would say the fact that Spears, Canty and Ferguson have 2 sacks combined speaks volumes for what I think of his groceries. We all got suckered into believing the last few draft classes were a huge success and this team had a ton of talent on defense. Sorry but Im not seeing it in the trenches where it matters most.