Waffle;1444607 said:
My post earlier had nothing to do with MY opinion about Romo or to thump any chest to proclaim that "I was right" about anything. It was about YOU and your current opinion about Romo versus your opinion about Henson. Based on the very constructive discussions I thought we have had in the past, for you to say that "chest thumping" was my motivation was just an undeserved cheap shot.
Anyway...did you see how awful our defense played toward the end of last season? To use the losing streak as an indictment on Romo is ridiculous. Sure, he had his faults and made some mistakes too, but he still completed 60% of his passes and averaged 250 yards a game during the month of December. Did Aikman have that good a statline during any stretch in the '89 season? Without researching the matter, I'll go out on a limb and say no. Yet you still believed Aikman was the guy? Hmmm.
Well, I think when someone is the overall #1 pick in the draft, most would tend to believe in the guy. But it doesn't always turn out that way. Just ask Tim Couch or David Carr. And this is what it's really all about, isn't it? You're not sold on Romo because of "pedigree." It's a direct result of that now infamous scouting report that said Henson would "have been a #1 pick" had he chose football over baseball and because he played at a major university...and Romo went (GASP!!!) undrafted!!! Not only that, he played for a Division II school!
No matter what you say now, we all know you were (still are) totally sold on Henson. You thought Henson only needed the opportunity. You weren't alone either my friend. And he only played in one and a half real games. That's fine. It's your opinion. Romo's played in 10, took his team to the playoffs in spite of a defense that collapsed late, made a Pro Bowl, and you're still not sold. That's cool. Whatever.
Waffle, you can say what I was or wasn't totally sold on all you want. I have no problem telling you or anyone else exactly how I felt, and how I currently feel. I have no problem admitting when I'm wrong, and I feel no need to always be right.
The fact is, and I will state it again clearly, that I believed then, and believe to this day, that Drew Henson was mishandled by the Parcells team. Period. That is my view.
Now, you and others can judge me out of my mind for that, and that is a-ok with me. I've been wrong many times before, and maybe I'm wrong on that. No biggie. Just being honest with how I feel.
To take that a step further and say I was totally sold on him is just incorrect. I had a GREAT desire to see the guy get to play for an extended period. Argued for it vehemently. Yes, I argued it based upon scouting reports and his potential. What I was arguing through all of that was NOT that he was a "can't miss", but rather that we will never know if we don't give the guy a real chance. Still wish it had happened. It didn't. WE MOVE ON. I MOVE ON. THE COWBOYS HAVE MOVED ON.
I'm pretty sure that Drew Henson will NEVER amount to anything now. I'm quite certain about that. Furthermore, I really don't care. He isn't a Dallas Cowboys player anymore.
I'm looking at our present and our future. I'm aching for a consistent winner in Dallas again. I'm hoping it is Tony Romo.
If it is Tony Romo I won't give a flip whether he has pedigree or not.
In terms of Aikman, I've already explained myself. Good offensive line, poor offensive line, 1-11 in his first 12 starts or 11-1.
Anyone who couldn't see that Troy Aikman had everything necessary to play QB in the NFL was just blind.
As I said, anyone who can say now that they saw 3 SB wins was a lot smarter than me. I didn't see that. But I was firmly convinced that he was going to be a major league QB.
I don't think that makes me particularly bright. Alot of people had him as the #1 overall pick in 1989. There was a reason for that.
The Tim Couch's and David Carr's of the world are just the attempts of other teams and gm's to find THEIR Aikman, or Elway. It rarely works out. Those guys are once in a decade guys.