Some Putty perspective

waldoputty

waldoputty

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,375
Reaction score
21,163
the offense started worst than expected.
the defense started in pretty much the best case scenario.
currently not a contender and the rams would roast this team as it stands.

so the questions are:
oline - does playing together and more experience solidify the line without tfred? it will get better, but doubtful it would be a good run blocking line.
tfred - knock on wood, he gets back by mid/late season. perhaps the biggest question for the season.
wrs - the fas does soften the wr rebuild. are they as good as last year by mid season, probably. is there upside? some. though probably drafting a wr high next season.
tes - rico is the big hope. swaim is playable but barely. best case the other guy just blocks.
dak - he is a rpo type guy and he needs a multi-wr look to be comfortable. is it a matter of more playing time with the new guys to really get him back on track?

the d is looking good and will be better as more passrushers come back in gregory and irving.
looks like a top 5 d or even better if passrushers kick in.

if tfred comes back 100%, we got a chance to give dak the time and security.
otherwise we are talking tanking after game 8.
 
waldoputty said:
the offense started worst than expected.
the defense started in pretty much the best case scenario.
currently not a contender and the rams would roast this team as it stands.

so the questions are:
oline - does playing together and more experience solidify the line without tfred? it will get better, but doubtful it would be a good run blocking line.
tfred - knock on wood, he gets back by mid/late season. perhaps the biggest question for the season.
wrs - the fas does soften the wr rebuild. are they as good as last year by mid season, probably. is there upside? some. though probably drafting a wr high next season.
tes - rico is the big hope. swaim is playable but barely. best case the other guy just blocks.
dak - he is a rpo type guy and he needs a multi-wr look to be comfortable. is it a matter of more playing time with the new guys to really get him back on track?

the d is looking good and will be better as more passrushers come back in gregory and irving.
looks like a top 5 d or even better if passrushers kick in.

if tfred comes back 100%, we got a chance to give dak the time and security.
otherwise we are talking tanking after game 8.
Click to expand...
Besides Dez and bottom Roster guys he still basically has the same WR as last year.
 
waldoputty said:
the offense started worst than expected.
the defense started in pretty much the best case scenario.
currently not a contender and the rams would roast this team as it stands.

so the questions are:
oline - does playing together and more experience solidify the line without tfred? it will get better, but doubtful it would be a good run blocking line.
tfred - knock on wood, he gets back by mid/late season. perhaps the biggest question for the season.
wrs - the fas does soften the wr rebuild. are they as good as last year by mid season, probably. is there upside? some. though probably drafting a wr high next season.
tes - rico is the big hope. swaim is playable but barely. best case the other guy just blocks.
dak - he is a rpo type guy and he needs a multi-wr look to be comfortable. is it a matter of more playing time with the new guys to really get him back on track?

the d is looking good and will be better as more passrushers come back in gregory and irving.
looks like a top 5 d or even better if passrushers kick in.

if tfred comes back 100%, we got a chance to give dak the time and security.
otherwise we are talking tanking after game 8.
Click to expand...
Tanking? Please. Defense “looking good”? I’d say they’re looking great.
 
exciter said:
Apparently it's not any worse and I haven't seen any of these receivers quit in the middle of a series and go scream and cry on the sidelines!
Click to expand...
The difference is that this unit has no potential to get better.

As always, things with Dez on the sideline is way overblown. The only WR we have who can make plays outside of what the defense gives is Tavon Austin and thats.....really bad.
 
Ranching said:
Don't agree. He was an emotional leader that attacked the weak offensive staff. They cut him and then took his advice and added a couple of plays. I'd rather have Dez than Garrett and Linehan any day. A coach with balls could have controlled him, and God forbid, maybe even teach him a route or two.
Click to expand...
Can’t teach someone who doesn’t want to learn. Dez was a cancer. Witten should’ve decked him when Dez had one of his sideline drama fits.
 
For all you guys that still want Dez here, explain it to me. Are we blaming Dak for him not getting open? I just don't see how he adds anything to what we already have. AND as it has been said many times, there are at least 30 teams, maybe 31, that believe he is not worth the investment.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Members online

... and 96 more.
Total: 7,815 (members: 196, guests: 7,619)
Robots: 1,340

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
474,007
Messages
14,506,128
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top