CowboyStar88
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 25,064
- Reaction score
- 28,281
Its not mutually exclusive. Free has played well this year but he is still the weakest link on the OL. He isn't as good as some think because he has two Pro Bowlers next to him and scheme help like X is pointing out.
And saying that doesn't mean Parnell is better than Free. But Parnell has more upside and at one third of the salary, may very well be the starter next year if Free wants a pay raise next season.
Who are the pro bowlers? Nobody has made the PB yet. Also Free was pretty good last year as well. I get some have an axe to grind but Free has been damn good this year and I haven't heard a single coach player or scout confirm these claims of Free always getting help. If it has I stand corrected. But I think you can pick out pretty much any play without knowing the call and say see so and so is getting help. Sorry not buying that Parnell is a better player or option at a 1/3 of the price. We have no idea what/if Frees new cap hit will be after they restructure him if that's what they decide to do. But I'm not sure about others but it's tiring to see the weekly slight of hand towards free for no real reason but to make a case for your pet cat.
