TheMarathonContinues
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 84,009
- Reaction score
- 76,710
Yes. But you'd have paid him 2.53m.
You'd pay him this for this year and then nothing next year? I don't see the problem here.
Yes. But you'd have paid him 2.53m.
You'd pay him this for this year and then nothing next year? I don't see the problem here.
I'm not interested in paying 2.53m to a backup guard who can't be active on game days because he lacks all position flex for a year to then turnaround and lose him for nothing.
I'd rather keep that money get a pick and move on.
Why is this confusing?
You're not interested? Is it breaking your bank account? He's insurance for when or if our linemen get hurt. That's far more valuable to me then a 6th round pick or saving 2.5 million that we won't even use.
He's insurance if exactly one of our lineman gets hurt (Collins).
What makes you confident Leary can step in at RG on a moment's notice?
We know he can't play center or tackle.
And there is no single deal that can "break a team's bank." It is the accumulation of smaller bad decisions that does just that.
And do you know how you increase your likelihood of stealing a Richard Sherman or Tom Brady? Or acquiring ammo to move up and get your guy?
It's called pick accumulation. I'd much rather acquire a pick, save money and find a backup guard who has position flex... MUCH RATHER... than pay Leary and then lose him for nothing.
Cap space. We don't need no stinking cap space. You don't win any awards for cap space plus you can manipulate it. Giants just spent 200 million and if they wanted to sign more, they could call the head bean counter and tell him to make it work and rework deals to free up space. Plus the cap has been going up 10 mill each year for the last couple of years.
He's insurance if exactly one of our lineman gets hurt (Collins).
What makes you confident Leary can step in at RG on a moment's notice?
We know he can't play center or tackle.
And there is no single deal that can "break a team's bank." It is the accumulation of smaller bad decisions that does just that.
And do you know how you increase your likelihood of stealing a Richard Sherman or Tom Brady? Or acquiring ammo to move up and get your guy?
It's called pick accumulation. I'd much rather acquire a pick, save money and find a backup guard who has position flex... MUCH RATHER... than pay Leary and then lose him for nothing.
You won me over at least....
if he doesn't even suit up then see what you can get and save the 2.5m......in fact I would cut a few other over-priced back-ups and trade for an impact player or roll it over to next year....
Leary 2.5m - trade
Wilcox 1.8m - cut
Gachkar 1.8 - cut
DMC 2.1m - cut
Church 4.75m - trade
TMcClain 1m - cut
You won me over at least....
if he doesn't even suit up then see what you can get and save the 2.5m......in fact I would cut a few other over-priced back-ups and trade for an impact player or roll it over to next year....
Leary 2.5m - trade
Wilcox 1.8m - cut
Gachkar 1.8 - cut
DMC 2.1m - cut
Church 4.75m - trade
TMcClain 1m - cut
No it isn't. Especially if the comp pick we get is higher.Saving 2m on Leary and losing a quality reserve for a 6th round pick (what Broaddus suggests we can get) isn't really worth it.
Remember net savings will be around $500k less on each of these moves since a bottom salary moves up. Saving 2m on Leary and losing a quality reserve for a 6th round pick (what Broaddus suggests we can get) isn't really worth it.
I like Gachkar, a jack of all trades, but don't see a spot for him with the starting 3 plus Wilson, Hitchens and Smith. Maybe he sticks since Smith likely doesn't play this year.
DMC is the guy that makes the most sense to get rid of....trade would be better than outright release. He doesn't fit the system as well as the other two do and that makes him expendable.
Cowboys still consider Church a leader so don't expect him to go anywhere.
I'd love to drop McClain and pick up Freeney.
No it isn't. Especially if the comp pick we get is higher.
He's insurance if exactly one of our lineman gets hurt (Collins).
What makes you confident Leary can step in at RG on a moment's notice?
We know he can't play center or tackle.
And there is no single deal that can "break a team's bank." It is the accumulation of smaller bad decisions that does just that.
And do you know how you increase your likelihood of stealing a Richard Sherman or Tom Brady? Or acquiring ammo to move up and get your guy?
It's called pick accumulation. I'd much rather acquire a pick, save money and find a backup guard who has position flex... MUCH RATHER... than pay Leary and then lose him for nothing.
Richard Sherman was a 5th round pick so I understand that. I'm not against trading Leary for a 5th rounder. But a 6th rounder? There's only one Tom Brady in the league. Good luck trying to find the next one. Either way, we will have a 6th rounder and if we want another 6th rounder we can accumulate as many as we want being teams don't really value them. Talk to me about pick accumulation when they are 5th rounders or higher.
I'm not confident Leary can step right in at RG. Apparently his team is since they refuse to trade him.
the strength of the team is the ol - we are going to weaken our most proven depth at ol in leary?
we did not draft a replacement yet.
look at the alternative - looney.
i think leary is a much better player that can backup both guard spots.
remember martin was hurt last year in camp.
looney is mostly for c and same-game emergency guard backup.
if starting g is hurt for more than 1 game, leary will start.
our backups at ot is stronger - green and brown.
No it isn't. Especially if the comp pick we get is higher.