dbair1967
Arch Defender
- Messages
- 30,782
- Reaction score
- 1
Zaxor;1586306 said:I personally think Vick is involved. But NO WAY can you take away his pay for a year especially if later he is exonerated...
Think about it..now granted this a bit far fetched but it is still in the realm of reality...
lets say that it happened just like Vick said and later his Defense attorneys can prove that these cooperating witnesses had tried to extort money from Vick and when they didn't get it made up their stories...
So vick not only lost a year of playing time but his salary and his endorsements because someone lied.
How in the world can someone say that the NFL made the right move...Vick violated neither the personal conduct or broke any law...
now you might say he should have never helped out a family member... agreed if he knew he was shady but if he had no idea how can you hold him responsible he is not his brother's keeper...
now again granted... I do not see the above scenario as plausible but it is still possible.
The NFL would be just as guilty as those that tried to extort and use Vick and that would be the bigger blackeye than having waited till due process took place
sure you can take away his pay, just because a potentially ignorant jury would see Vick as a victim and let him off doesnt mean he is innocent of all charges...he's hired (ie PAID) a bigtime defense attorney who has gotten some people out of ridiculous stuff because of an extremely flawed judicial system, but as before, if he gets off it doesnt mean he is innocent
again folks, READ THE INDICTMENT...he is not going to be exonerated...he is going to either be convicted of some very serious stuff or plea bargain out
there is a reason the league, the team and all his endoresement companies have all bailed on him, and it isnt because of public pressure
David