Well, there are two ways of fulfilling that desire:I want to know why?..... after three iterations of the big screen Spidey that we don't have this version yet?
The muscular, long and lanky Spidey?
are you familiar with the difference between comics and reality? I'm not saying your logic isn't sound for real life, but for comics this is what vulture looks like
He's an old man. Maybe he's not 65, maybe he's 60, I don't know, but anyone familiar with the character won't think Keaton is too old.
Parker started out 15/16-ish in the books. Marvel hired Tom Holland and looks closest to that age, which is a departure from Sony's Tobey Maguire and Andrew Garfield. Maguire and Garfield had youthful appearances but Holland looks definitely like he's a year or two short of reaching 18.
On the other hand, Sony started out with Rosemary Harris, who has the GRAND-aunt appearance of the original May Parker but then made her look still very mature yet somewhat younger with casting Sally FIeld. I'm not sure who started de-aging Aunt May first, Sony or Marvel, but Marvel had started doing so in cartoons (not sure about books) during the past decade or so. Obviously, they like the idea for better marketing the upcoming film with Marisa Tomei.
I like both approaches. Spider-Man looks like a kid starting out like Stan Lee helped created him. Aunt May looks more like the sister of Parker's late 30's/early 40's parents instead of his grandmother. Then again, 'sexy' Aunt May may take a little getting used to.
Slightly off-topic - nice short interview with Stan Lee about Spider-Man, etc.:
I'm saying he conjures giant hammers, chainsaws, guns....whatever, as opposed to conjuring new weapons that would suit whatever needs he has for a particular foe. For instance, why can't he conjure up some razor sharp "appendages" that could envelop and imprison his enemy, instead of having to counter with a new weapon each time his opponent eludes the current one?
I wasn't a fan at first, but I grew to like him. I always thought of Magneto as more physically intimidating, whereas McKellen has a rather frail appearance.
They probably feel it would be harder to buy into his being an unpopular nerd.I want to know why?..... after three iterations of the big screen Spidey that we don't have this version yet?
The muscular, long and lanky Spidey?
Fasbender is a hell of an actor, Red!!!
I see your point but it's worth noting that there have been tons of art concerning Green Lantern and the Corps over the decades. There have been numerous emerald power configurations that artists have drawn and they haven't always regulated weapons to simplistic ones--especially after the company stopped allowing the Comics Authority to reign in artistic imagination since the early 80s. Plus, there is particular opponent or opponents' strengths to consider. Lastly, Power Rings produce anything the ring wearer thinks at the speed of thought but the wielder must actually think before something happens. One might not consider an arsenal of possible weapons in the heat of battle and instead pick what might seem as the logical offensive or defensive tool.
Bold: That was option 1.
But I hope you're not trying to fit a tall actor into a Spider-Man role. The character has never been drawn as physically imposing. Marvel has never had the character morph somewhat like Wolverine for example.
Bold: That was option 1.
Not sure exactly what you mean. If you referring to Spider-Man, he isn't drawn comparatively tall and has less physical bulk versus some other characters. Other characters, like Thor for example, are drawn taller and bulkier.
