Hard to choose because of different era's, teams, and overall personalities but here goes.
Romo - Aikman > Staubach
I put Romo slightly over Aikman because I think he's an overall better athlete... third Staubach. This is only an opinion nothing more and I respect others on this forum.
But this is my reasoning:
Romo has done alot more with less.... alot less.
I consider him the pound for pound best we've had in terms of an individual qb. (here is where many others disagree) and you may be right but this is my point of view. Individuals being compared at an individual position but using team accomplishments for this point is harsh imo.
Staubach era: "Not being able to win the big game" "Next year's Champion" -kinda sounds like Romo's era huh?
Coached by: HOFer Tom Landry
Supporting cast: Lance Alworth, Golden Richards, Mike Ditka, Billy Joe Dupree, Jackie Smith, Rayfield Wright, Forest Gregg, Robert Newhouse, Calvin Hill, and Tony Dorsett
AND THE DOOMSDAY DEFENSE need I say more.
HOFers on O:Alworth, Ditka, Dorsett, Hayes, Smith, Wright
SB's VI and XII were easily decided by a great running game and amazing defense. A defense that only gave up 1 td in 25 qtrs prior to SB VI. SB XII had White and Martin as co-SB MVP's.
IMO these SB victories were directly related to dominating defense and a great running game.(which i wish was still our identity) why these accomplishments of two SB's is given to Staubach as if he did it alone beats me. Do not get me wrong Staubach was something to watch, great athlete ahead of his time and a commanding general type of leader but was on a team assemble by gods IMO. Caliber of team was to high and to good to give the credit to Staubach. Staubach was replaceable and if Morton stayed he could have won SB also imo.
Troy Aikman's era: "A new Age" new owner, new coach, and a football minded front office.
Traded only pro bowler on the team to get five veteran players and eight draft choices. What Jimmy did was magical. He knew how to make "ball players" and a solid ball club. (I miss Jimmy alot)
Coach: Jimmy Johnson - A champion everywhere he went
Supporting Cast: EMMITT SMITH, MICHEAL IRVIN, Daryl Johnson, Alvin Harper, Newton, Williams, Stepnoski, Novachek and great defenses on the SB yrs.
HOFers on O:Micheal Irvin, Emmitt Smith need I say more.
Aikman's SB victories again were related to great defenses and A running game that produced the NFL LEADING RUSHER in NFL HISTORY
Aikman and Staubach had the chance, the privledge, nay the pleasure to grace the field with some of the best talent the NFL has ever seen and coached by some of the best in history. They also had more than a hand full of HOFers on each team and great defenses. Some of you make it sound as if they won all the games by themselves. They were just cogs in a much bigger organization. From top to bottom (owner who let the coach do his job, Front office, and Coach) those SB winning teams were complete and solid.
Romo's era: Rebuilding, Head coach change, front office brings in hired guns. Front office lets guns go to clean house. A lot slower process in the front office to get back to being a solid ball club again but its happening. There has been alot of good progress. (I am pleased)
Coached by:Bill Parcels (didnt seem like he wanted the job anyway) Wade Phillips (good DC)
Supporting Cast:An o-line like swiss cheese, an aging wr Terry Glenn, pre madonna wr T oh no, and a mediocre defense at best over the years but now starting to improve.
Romo can boast team accomplishments when this team is better as a whole when this is a SB TEAM (owner who lets coach do his job, Front office that makes good deals and doesnt over pay and coach that can utilize all weapons).
We are getting there, Romo is getting there, his supporting cast is barely getting there.
Romo is something special and wont be realized till he's gone or he wins a SB all by himself
Plug in Tony into 71' 77' 92' 93' 95' and Tony would have 5 SBs
Thanks for your time I usually dont reply but thought it was a good topic of hypothetical there's no right or wrong answer....I like reading but hardly share opinion because afraid to get into disputes with anyone on this forum I like all of you for different reasons and enjoy your insights and silliness at the same time.