Stephen Gilmore pick

[MarcusRock]

Keep back pedaling. You got exposed and now you are coming up with ridiculous excuses. What are you going to come up with next? MG's toes were on a 23-degree angle, so it wasn't a foul? Or Gilmore's gloves were cleaner than MG's glove, so it wasn't a foul? LOL

A Liar lies
Liar gets busted
Liar contorts other's argument to call them a liar as a cover
Liar hopes no one notices
Everyone noticed

Video next time Zman. Video. Leave those dinky deceptive still photos in the trash heap.

 

[Zman5]

A Liar lies
Liar gets busted
Liar contorts other's argument to call them a liar as a cover
Liar hopes no one notices
Everyone noticed

Video next time Zman. Video. Leave those dinky deceptive still photos in the trash heap.

Yes we know about you and your deceptive lies. Showing chopped up videos that only show parts of what happened. Unlike your fake news videos, I've provided videos that fully showed what really happened. So how much do your ref buddies pay you to lie to people on football forums?

 

[john van brocklin]

Maybe we should take a poll on who's fault it is?

 

[MarcusRock]

Yes we know about you and your deceptive lies. Showing chopped up videos that only show parts of what happened. Unlike your fake news videos, I've provided videos that fully showed what really happened. So how much do your ref buddies pay you to lie to people on football forums?

You only provided videos after getting busted showing still photos 6 frames off of "what really happened." Which itself was right after you quoted a rule leaving out the part that killed your argument. Tell us how you did that, oh noble one? Lol.

If a person is lying filth in the woods and no one is around to recognize them as such, are they really lying filth? Actually, nevermind because I busted you being lying filth out in the open so we all know.

 

[Zman5]

You only provided videos after getting busted showing still photos 6 frames off of "what really happened." Which itself was right after you quoted a rule leaving out the part that killed your argument. Tell us how you did that, oh noble one? Lol.

If a person is lying filth in the woods and no one is around to recognize them as such, are they really lying filth? Actually, nevermind because I busted you being lying filth out in the open so we all know.

I got busted? LOL. Only in your agenda driven feeble mind. All you do is tell everyone ref is always right even when NFL rules video says you are wrong. You lie and show chopped up videos to try BS everyone. Too bad no one is falling for your crap.

 

[MarcusRock]

I got busted? LOL. Only in your agenda driven feeble mind. Only thing you do is tell everyone ref is right even when NFL rules video says you are wrong.

The NFL rules video didn't tell you to leave out the part of the rule that destroyed your case. Only a person arguing from a position of deficit needs to pull a dishonest move like that. But you have no qualms being a liar so ...

 

[Zman5]

The NFL rules video didn't tell you to leave out the part of the rule that destroyed your case. Only a person arguing from a position of deficit needs to pull a dishonest move like that. But you have no qualms being a liar so ...

The NFL video clearly showed examples that proves I was right about the play. You can clearly see it unless you are blind, and an agenda driven BSing liar like yourself.

 

[MarcusRock]

The NFL video clearly showed examples that proves I was right about the play. You can clearly see it unless you are blind, and an agenda driven BSing liar like you.

The videos are NOTHING like this play. I understand you needing them to be to divert from being busted as a liar here but the video doesn't lie (like you do, lol).

Busted posting half a rule to hide the part that destroys your case.
Busted posting a picture 6 frames later to try to bolster your case.
Busted trying to be a strawman king to change what I actually claimed to make your flawed argument look better.

Yep, these are the actions of one who had a strong case. Lol.

 

[Zman5]

The videos are NOTHING like this play. I understand you needing them to be to divert from being busted as a liar here but the video doesn't lie (like you do, lol).

Busted posting half a rule to hide the part that destroys your case.
Busted posting a picture 6 frames later to try to bolster your case.
Busted trying to be a strawman king to change what I actually claimed to make your flawed argument look better.

Yep, these are the actions of one who had a strong case. Lol.

As I said, unless you are a blind agenda driven liar like yourself, the video shows exactly what happened on that play.
You got exposed and all you are doing now is trying to make up stuff and deflect by pointing out thing that has nothing to do with the foul.

 

[mahoneybill]

This. Over and over again. Dak himself owns the fact that he gets “greedy” and is too aggressive in the first half with trying too hard to push the ball down the field.

He just needs to settle down and make the easy read and let the game to come to him. Get the running game going, make the safe read, use his legs, and work off playaction vs trying to make the tight window/contested ball throws.

-----------

Well stated.

 

[MarcusRock]

As I said, unless you are a blind agenda driven liar like yourself, the video shows exactly what happened on that play.
You got exposed and all you are doing now is trying to make up stuff and deflect by pointing out thing that has nothing to do with the foul.

You lying about the foul has to do with the foul because it means your take on the foul was flawed from the beginning. That's why you later turned to the NFL rules videos which looked nothing like this play to try to retool your argument. Fail. So you did your videos (after the fact because your still picture lie got found out) and I actually articulated the rule from the rulebook. All of the rules, not just pieces of them like you tried. Owned. Now own it.

 

[Zman5]

You lying about the foul has to do with the foul because it means your take on the foul was flawed from the beginning. That's why you later turned to the NFL rules videos which looked nothing like this play to try to retool your argument. Fail. So you did your videos (after the fact because your still picture lie got found out) and I actually articulated the rule from the rulebook. All of the rules, not just pieces of them like you tried. Owned. Now own it.

You need to back pedal harder. Everyone has caught on to your BS. No one is buying your typical ridiculous lies. You need to come up with better BS. Maybe you can come up with a new excuse on how the "Defender's finger was pointing up at 10-degree angle so it's not a foul" or something like that. Learn how to make deep fake videos since you like to show chopped up fake news videos.

 

[MarcusRock]

You need to back pedal harder. Everyone has caught on to your BS. No one is buying your typical ridiculous lies. You need to come up with better BS. Maybe you can come up with a new excuse on how the "Defender's finger was pointing up at 10-degree angle so it's not a foul" or something like that. Learn how to make deep fake videos since you like to show chopped up fake news videos.

Pointing out how crappy your argument was is not backpedaling. Unlike you, I've never changed my story because I know the rules, quote them directly, and can articulate them to pair with video. It was you that went from:

half quoting rules
to posting deceptive still shots
to running to the NFL rules videos that don't apply here
to trying to misrepresent my arguments because yours were faulty
to avoiding that Gallup's head was turned towards Gilmore before any contact about 10 times
to finally admitting Gallup's head and torso were in fact turned towards Gilmore
to then peddle a different version of what happened to try to obscure your dancing and evolving story

Again, these are not the actions of one with a solid argument and your lying agenda while accusing another of lying and having an agenda are what make you look like a total dishonorable tool with this display.

 

[Zman5]

Pointing out how crappy your argument was is not backpedaling. Unlike you, I've never changed my story because I know the rules, quote them directly, and can articulate them to pair with video. It was you that went from:

half quoting rules
to posting deceptive still shots
to running to the NFL rules videos that don't apply here
to trying to misrepresent my arguments because yours were faulty
to avoiding that Gallup's head was turned towards Gilmore before any contact about 10 times
to finally admitting Gallup's head and torso were in fact turned towards Gilmore
to then peddle a different version of what happened to try to obscure your dancing and evolving story

Again, these are not the actions of one with a solid argument and your lying agenda while accusing another of lying and having an agenda are what make you look like a total dishonorable tool with this display.

Lame as usual. You need to up your BS excuse game. It's gotten stale. And your cheap chopped up video "evidence" game needs to get better. You are not going to fool anyone with that cheap BS trick.

 

[MarcusRock]

Lame as usual. You need to up your BS excuse game. It's gotten stale. And your cheap chopped up video "evidence" game needs to get better. You are not going to fool anyone with that cheap BS trick.

No, telling the truth as usual. But what would you know about the truth? Your version of truth changes every time your lying ways get found out and then you find a new "truth." I just reviewed that. You journeyed from:

half quoting rules
to posting deceptive still shots
to running to the NFL rules videos that don't apply here
to trying to misrepresent my arguments because yours were faulty
to avoiding that Gallup's head was turned towards Gilmore before any contact about 10 times
to finally admitting Gallup's head and torso were in fact turned towards Gilmore
to then peddle a different version of what happened to try to obscure your dancing and evolving story​

 

[Zman5]

No, telling the truth as usual. But what would you know about the truth? Your version of truth changes every time your lying ways get found out and then you find a new "truth." I just reviewed that. You journeyed from:

half quoting rules
to posting deceptive still shots
to running to the NFL rules videos that don't apply here
to trying to misrepresent my arguments because yours were faulty
to avoiding that Gallup's head was turned towards Gilmore before any contact about 10 times
to finally admitting Gallup's head and torso were in fact turned towards Gilmore
to then peddle a different version of what happened to try to obscure your dancing and evolving story​

Marcus's "ref is always right" routine.

1. Claims ref was right and asks for video evidence when someone disagrees.
2. Someone provides him video evidence from NFL Football Operations that proves the ref made a mistake.
3. He claims the video is wrong and then posts a chopped up manipulate video and once again tells everyone the refs are never wrong.
4. When more videos are provided that exposes his BS, he posts the rule and his BS interpretation of the rule and claims his interpretation is correct and so are the refs.
5. He posts more BS excuses for the refs and tells everyone again the refs never make mistakes.
6. He then logs in to his checking account to verify he got a deposit from the NFL ref's union for every "refs always right" posts he made on the internet on their behalf this week.


Your trolling routine is getting boring. So how much are the ref's union paying you again to spread BS on the internet?

 

[loublue22]

Dak gets a lot of picks that aren't his fault and throws a bunch of balls that should be picked that are dropped that would be his fault.

 

[MarcusRock]

Marcus's "ref is always right" routine.

1. Claims ref was right and asks for video evidence when someone disagrees.
2. Someone provides him video evidence from NFL Football Operations that proves the ref made a mistake.
3. He claims the video is wrong and then posts a chopped up manipulate video and once again tells everyone the refs are never wrong.
4. When more videos are provided that exposes his BS, he posts the rule and his BS interpretation of the rule and claims his interpretation is correct and so are the refs.
5. He posts more BS excuses for the refs and tells everyone again the refs never make mistakes.
6. He then logs in to his checking account to verify he got a deposit from the NFL ref's union for every "refs always right" posts he made on the internet on their behalf this week.


Your trolling routine is getting boring. So how much are the ref's union paying you again to spread BS on the internet?

Lol. All of this for refusing to just respectfully take the "L." Others just politely go about their business but you need a way to redeem getting exposed for your front and center lie. Don't blame me. Just enter a discussion without slant for once.

 

[black label]

that not is daks fault

 

[Zman5]

Lol. All of this for refusing to just respectfully take the "L." Others just politely go about their business but you need a way to redeem getting exposed for your front and center lie. Don't blame me. Just enter a discussion without slant for once.

Weak as usual. You got owned and exposed and now you are trying to act like you did something by talking more BS. Everybody knows about your clown act when it comes to talking about the refs. Nobody is buying your absurd BS. So how much did you get paid this week for lying and BSing for the ref's union? Why aren't you answering the question?