I can't link it. You know where he is. In his most recent piece he makes the following statement when asked how the personnel packages on offense will change this year under McCarthy.
After breaking down their personnel usage last season he says the following:
Somehow, this team was so ill-prepared at receiver that it had to basically stop running its offense because it did not have NFL wide receivers anymore.
-
Whoa. Now let's say he's right. Pretty damning of the front office but does Brandin Cooks change that? Obviously he helps but is that enough? Are we going to rely on a rebuilt (and overrated) Michael Gallup and a Jalen Tolbert sighting (other than a few blurred images floating around the internet) so we are free to run the offense we want to run this year?
I like Brandin Cooks and he certainly is worth the cost to obtain him but the WR position still makes me feel uncomfortable. I want to surround Prescott with so many weapons that even he can beat the 49ers in January.
---
AdminEdit:
This thread is about RECEIVERS, not Dak Prescott.
Does not matter if you are a Dak hater or homer. Use one of the many other threads to post your constantly repeated opinions on Dak.
CeeDee over the course of a 17-game season put up some nice numbers... but he struggled at points and honestly was a bit of a liability in moments. By the end of the year, he proved he could be "the guy" but, while I'm very hopeful, I'm not sure he can level up again.
outside of CeeDee... I would agree with the comment:
did not have NFL wide receivers anymore
Gallup was a shell of his former self
Noah Brown is a 4th WR at best
and the young guys didn't pan out.
Cooks is a nice player but he isn't the answer. But he causes a bigger problem.
You start adding up the salaries of the WR room and you are investing a lot for not a lot.