burmafrd
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 43,820
- Reaction score
- 3,379
That pretty much sums it up.
once again for the Polyannas who have ignored the problem for years that is easy to do
That pretty much sums it up.
Arkin was very good in the Cardinals game. He only had 1 bad play.
If anyone concluded that Arkin can't play, it's not because they watched the Cardinals game. It's because they had come to the conclusion prior to that game.
People forget how bad Romo is when pressured up the middle. So I say it's a damn pressing need
In fairness, though (and you're right), his one bad play was a drive-ender. And the kind of thing he'd see a steady diet of if he were starting for us for any stretch.
This was the same RG we had last season when Romo threw for 4900 yards. And we upgraded the other two interior OL position. I'd say the need is a lot less pressing than it was.
It just find it interesting that his 1 bad play was not due to his reported lack of strength. He just stayed on the initial block too long and the stunting DE was able to get past him.
He had a 2nd play that initially looked bad, but upon slow-motion review, the RB tripped him and Arkin actually made a very impressive recovery to maintain his block while falling down.
Also, he's not going to be starting.
This angst over the RG position is unbelievable. There are contenders with holes at LT that get less attention than our RG position receives. The RG we're trotting out there is the same guy we played last season. We addressed two other starting positions on the line this offseason and have seen nothing but improved play (whatever that's worth) in three offseason games. I don't get it.
I see the connection you are trying to make, but I don't think the fact that Romo threw for 4,900 yards means the offensive line was necessarily good, or even serviceable.
People forget how bad Quarterbacks are when pressured up the middle. So I say it's a damn pressing need
It is what it is, this team as much as they want to yap about "Romo Friendly", doesn't value the oline as much as other positions. It's sad we're less than a month away from the 2013 season starting and we're begging linemen to come out of retirement to save us. It's sad and embarrassing what this line has been since the purge after the 2010 season.
It is what it is, this team as much as they want to yap about "Romo Friendly", doesn't value the oline as much as other positions. It's sad we're less than a month away from the 2013 season starting and we're begging linemen to come out of retirement to save us. It's sad and embarrassing what this line has been since the purge after the 2010 season.
This was the same RG we had last season when Romo threw for 4900 yards. And we upgraded the other two interior OL position. I'd say the need is a lot less pressing than it was.
It is what it is, this team as much as they want to yap about "Romo Friendly", doesn't value the oline as much as other positions. It's sad we're less than a month away from the 2013 season starting and we're begging linemen to come out of retirement to save us. It's sad and embarrassing what this line has been since the purge after the 2010 season.
Considering we've spent more resources on the oline than any other team over the last three seasons, your argument is baseless.
Considering we've spent more resources on the oline than any other team over the last three seasons, your argument is baseless.