1fisher
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 5,777
- Reaction score
- 120
Tony Romo would have eaten that team alive! Not a doubt in my mind. SMDH
I disagree with Sturm on the second throw. Williams didn't have a lot of room and it was from the far hashmark. I would feel more comfortable with Weeden making that throw, Cassel doesn't have the throwing acumen for it. Other than, nice job per usual.
YR
I disagree with Sturm on the second throw. Williams didn't have a lot of room and it was from the far hashmark. I would feel more comfortable with Weeden making that throw, Cassel doesn't have the throwing acumen for it. Other than, nice job per usual.
Timing based offense is an over statement. They use some timing routes but that one the 1st read and not something they do an all snaps. Romo has talked about one of the things he does best is be able to make it to 4th "read". There is no timing on 2nd, 3rd or 4th reads.
Cassel was not under pressure on those plays where Beasley was open, IIRC.
Beasley not doing it in the past is part of the reason that he is getting open. Almost everyone wants the Cowboys to change things up from their predictable offense and when they do, you complain about it.
Any QB could make those throws to Beasley, even Cassel if he saw it and attempted it. Beasley was just too wide open for those to be difficult throws.
Yes, Williams in the end zone was not really open. If Cassel turns his head in that direction the DB just step back to close down that space.
I think Sturm's point was that he might have been open but Cassel would never know because he never scanned the field.
I disagree about Weed making the throw. Do you remember the play where Witten was wide open down the seam and Weed could not get him the ball?
I don't think Weeden automatically makes that throw. In fact, I wouldn't want him to attempt it.
But, in terms of likelihood of making that throw...Weeden has a far better chance than noodle arm Cassel.
YR
This is pretty much what I expected. There are guys open, but just like Weeden, we're almost instantly taking the easy throw. This time it's with a totally different QB that actually took chances and moved the ball well just a week before.
You'd be really hard pressed to convince me that these guys aren't being told repeatedly not to take any chances unless it's a wide open, easy throw.
In the first clip, Beasley is WIDE OPEN on the route down the seam. Even Tim Tebow completes that for a touchdown.
The safety was shading towards Dez. You put the ball in the area code, and Beasley walks into the endzone.
On the last series, Cassel doesn't even look Beasley's way. Nor does he consider looking towards Dez to look off Beasley. The Seahawks see his eyes and move directly towards Dez. A competent quarterback checks off Dez and throws the deep route to Beasley, who is WIDE OPEN!!!
I can't watch anymore. It's truly frustrating. I don't want to hear any more about our receivers not getting open. Our scrub backups can't get them the ball.
Last year, the same fans were blaming T Will for not getting open despite Romo playing QB, before that, Miles Austin and so on. Beasley himself was never thrown to downfield even with Romo as QB.
What makes you think he was a primary target in the progression, especially considering our historical trend? Maybe Beasley was used specifically as a decoy. For Beasley to catch it, he would have to expect the ball is coming. If Cassell just throws it, Beasley may have no clue based on play design. That's why announcers often speak about disconnects between WRs and QBs on specific plays.
On break downs, such as the Giants game, Cassell found T Will downfield on the sideline along with Street for the TD. That predicates the play broke down and Cassell would go to whoever was open.
It's clear the offense thought that with the return of Dez, the offense was going to improve... And the offense targeted him and he didn't make plays...
This is pretty much what I expected. There are guys open, but just like Weeden, we're almost instantly taking the easy throw. This time it's with a totally different QB that actually took chances and moved the ball well just a week before.
You'd be really hard pressed to convince me that these guys aren't being told repeatedly not to take any chances unless it's a wide open, easy throw.
Please don't try to compare Romo with Cassel and Weeden.
Quarterbacks often miss the open man. But Romo makes many of those throws. He may miss a few, but his misses are few and far between compared to the passes he completes.
Cassel and Weeden miss the MAJORITY of those throws.
Do we throw them and miss them or not even make the throws, because you just said we supposedly have WRs running open free all day but we don't even go to them..
Last year, T Will supposedly couldn't get open and Beasley was never thrown to vertically, despite them being open..
Romo making a majority of those throws there when they are there, doesn't necessarily imply those throws are always there.. Those are different issues..
No, I didn't say we have receivers open free all day. I said we have receivers who are open, and we're not getting them the ball.
Second, as to your question, you evaluate the situation. Why think about continuously going to Dez when he's double and triple covered? Why not consider going to Beasley? How does that NOT enter your thinking, especially if you're a starting quarterback?
Third, what would have been the harm going to Beasley on the last series? Okay, you throw an incompletion. Didn't that happen too by forcing the ball to Dez? Beasley is on the field for a reason, and if you're not going to throw him the ball, then get him out and put a faster decoy in.
I don't know if I ever complained about TWill not getting open last year.
I don't get your point. We're watching the tape and seeing guys run open. If Cassel and Weeden had the percentage of completions that Romo has, maybe we can let them not hitting open receivers slide. But 97 yards?
Sorry, but trying to use Romo as a comparison is a major fail.