Sturm's Morning After: Cowboys have a coaching mess; Garrett ignores reality of the underdog

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,482
Reaction score
67,294
Sturm's Morning After: Cowboys have a coaching mess; Garrett ignores reality of the underdog

43 days ago, the Cowboys last won a football game. I am guessing a drought like that is generally a good sign that your season has gone into the dumpster.

43 days in the wilderness...wandering....looking for an answer. Somewhere. Anywhere.

Maybe it is this retread life-long QB who can save us. Nope. Let's try another one. Grab the one who has played on all of the other teams in the league. He is slightly better. Not really. Keep looking. Maybe it is that third guy who is over there on the bench and never played a snap in the NFL. Maybe he is the one who can save us.

Doubtful.

But, what could it hurt to try? That is where we are - where numerous people want to try the kid who has never taken a snap.

43 days in the football desert is enough to make a team see things off in the distance that look like an oasis of hope.

Perhaps it is the sack machine who is suspended by the league. He can save it... Or maybe it will be the return of the franchise wide receiver. Surely, when he comes back...

One of these combinations is likely to stop the bleeding, right? Hello?

This team will win another game this year. I am sure of it. Now, the question becomes whether it will happen while this team is potentially still alive. If, in fact, you are optimistic enough to think 2-5 is still alive, that is.

When Tony Romo was injured back on September 20th, the initial thought in every reasonable thinking Cowboys fans' mind was simply that the season is likely over. The one thing you simply cannot do in the NFL is to lose your starting QB for 2 months. The math doesn't work out. It can't be done.

But, then, the dust settles, and you start to try to figure out a way to break the code. The reasons are obvious. This is not a video game that you simply hit "reset" and start over. No, if you are going to start over in the NFL, it takes a year off everyone's contract and career and it requires 12 months of waiting. Nobody has time for that.

So, if you are like me, you get out the schedule and talk yourself into stealing a game here and a game there. Surely, if you must play for 2 months without Tony Romo, you can get three wins somewhere in there, right?

Or at least two? How about just a win against anyone?

This season is not what we had in mind as we stood in Oxnard looking at a very deep, talented, and confident team that seemed comfortable laying out their navigational path to the Super Bowl.

On Sunday, the Cowboys were in a very advantageous position in the game entering the 4th Quarter. They had outgained the 2-time defending NFC Champions in yardage and were going in to take the lead after that aforementioned sack machine just turned the game on its ear by batting a pass into the air that he intercepted and then tried to return to the end zone. If the offense can't score, maybe Greg Hardy can.

He tried. But, was tripped up at the 16-yard line. Down 10-9, the Cowboys now had the ball given to them inside the Seahawks 20-yard line with something any observer would label as the "golden opportunity that they simply cannot afford to waste."

http://beta.sportsdaydfw.com/dallas-cowboys/cowboys/2015/11/02/sturms-morning-garrett-ignores-reality-underdog
 

DandyDon1722

It's been a good 'un, ain't it?
Messages
6,386
Reaction score
7,008
That's pretty interesting coming from Sturm who I really respect. Not only that but it's the kind of thing that probably makes its way back to Garrett.

I'm with Floaty at this point. Bring in Kellen Moore and let him sling it around. He gets a free pass from me (and several thousand others) on INT's and mistakes.

Just throw the ball around and try and make plays - that's all anybody asks at this point.
 

xwalker

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,202
Reaction score
64,708
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Sturm's Morning After: Cowboys have a coaching mess; Garrett ignores reality of the underdog

43 days ago, the Cowboys last won a football game. I am guessing a drought like that is generally a good sign that your season has gone into the dumpster.

43 days in the wilderness...wandering....looking for an answer. Somewhere. Anywhere.

Maybe it is this retread life-long QB who can save us. Nope. Let's try another one. Grab the one who has played on all of the other teams in the league. He is slightly better. Not really. Keep looking. Maybe it is that third guy who is over there on the bench and never played a snap in the NFL. Maybe he is the one who can save us.

Doubtful.

But, what could it hurt to try? That is where we are - where numerous people want to try the kid who has never taken a snap.

43 days in the football desert is enough to make a team see things off in the distance that look like an oasis of hope.

Perhaps it is the sack machine who is suspended by the league. He can save it... Or maybe it will be the return of the franchise wide receiver. Surely, when he comes back...

One of these combinations is likely to stop the bleeding, right? Hello?

This team will win another game this year. I am sure of it. Now, the question becomes whether it will happen while this team is potentially still alive. If, in fact, you are optimistic enough to think 2-5 is still alive, that is.

When Tony Romo was injured back on September 20th, the initial thought in every reasonable thinking Cowboys fans' mind was simply that the season is likely over. The one thing you simply cannot do in the NFL is to lose your starting QB for 2 months. The math doesn't work out. It can't be done.

But, then, the dust settles, and you start to try to figure out a way to break the code. The reasons are obvious. This is not a video game that you simply hit "reset" and start over. No, if you are going to start over in the NFL, it takes a year off everyone's contract and career and it requires 12 months of waiting. Nobody has time for that.

So, if you are like me, you get out the schedule and talk yourself into stealing a game here and a game there. Surely, if you must play for 2 months without Tony Romo, you can get three wins somewhere in there, right?

Or at least two? How about just a win against anyone?

This season is not what we had in mind as we stood in Oxnard looking at a very deep, talented, and confident team that seemed comfortable laying out their navigational path to the Super Bowl.

On Sunday, the Cowboys were in a very advantageous position in the game entering the 4th Quarter. They had outgained the 2-time defending NFC Champions in yardage and were going in to take the lead after that aforementioned sack machine just turned the game on its ear by batting a pass into the air that he intercepted and then tried to return to the end zone. If the offense can't score, maybe Greg Hardy can.

He tried. But, was tripped up at the 16-yard line. Down 10-9, the Cowboys now had the ball given to them inside the Seahawks 20-yard line with something any observer would label as the "golden opportunity that they simply cannot afford to waste."

http://beta.sportsdaydfw.com/dallas-cowboys/cowboys/2015/11/02/sturms-morning-garrett-ignores-reality-underdog

The coaches are always wrong when they don't win regardless of the probabilities involved.

If they had gone for it and didn't make it, the same people saying they should have gone for it would be saying it was the wrong call to go for it.
 

DFWJC

Well-Known Member
Messages
59,981
Reaction score
48,729
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
The redzone play-calling drove me nuts (or more nuts) on Sunday.
Just mind-numbing stuff.
Just one TD and we probably win.

There is truth to what xw says though. Same (or mostly the same) people would be whining if we went for it and failed.

But we should have been more aggressive, imo.
 

xwalker

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,202
Reaction score
64,708
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
That's pretty interesting coming from Sturm who I really respect. Not only that but it's the kind of thing that probably makes its way back to Garrett.

I'm with Floaty at this point. Bring in Kellen Moore and let him sling it around. He gets a free pass from me (and several thousand others) on INT's and mistakes.

Just throw the ball around and try and make plays - that's all anybody asks at this point.

When Weed was the QB everyone demanded that they "bring in" Cassel and lamented on why they didn't "bring in" Cassel sooner.
 

Zordon

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,291
Reaction score
46,644
The coaches are always wrong when they don't win regardless of the probabilities involved.

If they had gone for it and didn't make it, the same people saying they should have gone for it would be saying it was the wrong call to go for it.

Nobody would say that X.

For God's sake, first play after the pick run a play action pass for a TE down the seam and lets at least try to win the game....if the play isn't there check down to a running back. Is that too much to ask? Garrett is an imbecile.
 

Idgit

Fattening up
Staff member
Messages
58,971
Reaction score
60,826
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Yeah, I thoroughly disagree with this. Taking unnecessary risks with Matt Cassel against the SEA secondary when they're compressed in the red zone is a bad bet. The fact that the Cowboys were underdogs is irrelevant. The only question is, 'do you have a play that you can convert with?' If you've got one, call it. If you don't, you take the fg. In this case, it's Sturm who doesn't fully understand what the underdog role required yesterday. And he should, since he saw what the downfield risk taking got us just last week against a much lesser secondary.

One more defensive stop wins that game. If you're betting the outcome on one of the two units we fielded yesterday, who you putting it all on? I'm saying 'defense,' with some enthusiasm on this one.
 

RS12

Well-Known Member
Messages
32,526
Reaction score
29,874
Sturm's Morning After: Cowboys have a coaching mess; Garrett ignores reality of the underdog

Wait a minute. Sturm doesnt agree with the fan boy thread that said there were no coaching issues?
muttley.gif
 

DandyDon1722

It's been a good 'un, ain't it?
Messages
6,386
Reaction score
7,008
The coaches are always wrong when they don't win regardless of the probabilities involved.

If they had gone for it and didn't make it, the same people saying they should have gone for it would be saying it was the wrong call to go for it.

X I'm not going to say you're wrong but the very essence of Sturm's article is that in the situation we're in we have to take risks to make up for deficiencies so taking a chance in that position felt like the right thing to do.
 

Idgit

Fattening up
Staff member
Messages
58,971
Reaction score
60,826
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
That's pretty interesting coming from Sturm who I really respect. Not only that but it's the kind of thing that probably makes its way back to Garrett.

I'm with Floaty at this point. Bring in Kellen Moore and let him sling it around. He gets a free pass from me (and several thousand others) on INT's and mistakes.

Just throw the ball around and try and make plays - that's all anybody asks at this point.

With Romo hurt, we don't have a QB who can win games for us. We can try every ratchet in the set, some of them more than once if we want to. None of them are going to fit.

The only way we win is play better football around the QB until Romo gets back. That means continue to play solid defense, and not give up big plays, turn the ball over, and blow ST coverages. It doesn't meant taking stupid low-percentage chances in the red zone.

People are losing their minds because of the losing streak, I think.
 

reddyuta

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,513
Reaction score
17,235
The coaches are always wrong when they don't win regardless of the probabilities involved.

If they had gone for it and didn't make it, the same people saying they should have gone for it would be saying it was the wrong call to go for it.

You still don't get it.we had lost 4 straight with a QB who can't sustain drives.when you have 4 the and short in the red zone you go for it hope to get a first down or even a TD.we are playing the game as if we are 4-2 instead of 2-4.
 

DandyDon1722

It's been a good 'un, ain't it?
Messages
6,386
Reaction score
7,008
With Romo hurt, we don't have a QB who can win games for us. We can try every ratchet in the set, some of them more than once if we want to. None of them are going to fit.

The only way we win is play better football around the QB until Romo gets back. That means continue to play solid defense, and not give up big plays, turn the ball over, and blow ST coverages. It doesn't meant taking stupid low-percentage chances in the red zone.

People are losing their minds because of the losing streak, I think.

Probably guilty as charged. You would think at this point we could get one break - one call - one bounce of the football - one mistake from the other team to sneak a win out and it just hasn't happened.
 

CATCH17

1st Round Pick
Messages
67,664
Reaction score
86,205
That is exactly the kind of move a risk-adverse coach like Garrett would never do.


I would stick with Cassell and adjust some of my offenses philosophies that don't work.


Cassell is not the problem. He is proven in this league. You can win with him.


I don't want Garrett to have the excuse of a guy like Kellen Moore who has never played.
 
Top