diefree666
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 3,529
- Reaction score
- 4,153
and what makes you any kind of poster worth listening to?lol, just as your opinion is totally wrong. Someone with 666 in their avatar, ya right.
and what makes you any kind of poster worth listening to?lol, just as your opinion is totally wrong. Someone with 666 in their avatar, ya right.
and what makes you any kind of poster worth listening to?
I was definitely expecting it when he made the comment.What is interesting is that Tank made that statement and the League did not fine him. Which they usually do when someone specifically criticizes the officials.
Well, they still canWhat is interesting is that Tank made that statement and the League did not fine him. Which they usually do when someone specifically criticizes the officials.
Eh, I think he's much more pro Cowboys because of his relationships with the coaches and old staff. He won't say what's truly on his mind because of this whereas the rest don't really care
Oh God. That one was unforgivably obvious, too. Two guys choked him to the ground. You're bringing up some bad memories!
Helman is far from a company man. They're all allowed to speak their minds on DC.com...the only 'company man' is Micky.
The Break consistently talk about how poor the playcalling has been which includes their boss, Derek Eagleton.
Me and you getting ROWDY at the draft!! Lol.Goodell should fear for his life during the draft next year.
I'd bet anything 8 more holding calls = one more win.
And that's just the average, in reality this dline deserves more holding calls than any team in the league (25+).
Oh right, then I agree for sure. They wouldn't even acknowledge it if they didn't see something thereI phrased that badly, I wasn't calling those two shills. My point is that they are generally on the side of the Cowboys but aren't going for shock value or click bait like a Skip Bayless or SAS.
like your avatar you really must do a lot of LSD. no other explanation for some of the things you postFor one, I don't have a reference to 666.
That's not what I saw on that play. From a still I get why people think that. From the video, not at all. It's nothing like ones we've seen this year, and I'd be upset if Dallas got called for what GB did on that play.
I was upset at other non-calls against GB that game, however.
Confused.
A "sleeper" choke-from behind is egregious holding at any level of football.
I think the Chargers scrum where all of their linemen tackled their guy at once or the three facemasks against Dak were the epitome. Sad that you can make a list of screwjobs and not even include the Zeke travesty.The worst was that non-holding call against the Skins a couple of weeks ago. Crawford clearly beat his man and TWO Skins O-Linemen held him at the same time...right in front of the ref and no flag was called.
YR
He's a shill. That's been an established fact for years. One of the biggest homers in Cowboys history.
A nice guy, but his bias makes every show he's on worse, not better.
They don’t want to draw more attention to the no calls. Fans that don’t know much just think it’s routine complaining. The facts say the no calls are unique.What is interesting is that Tank made that statement and the League did not fine him. Which they usually do when someone specifically criticizes the officials.
True and they may have the same evidence. I don’t know, but we have many examples of very blatant tackle holds and shirt grabs after being passed, which are very hard to miss. You’d think.Did anyone look at the breakdown link Helman provided? Maybe I am not reading it correctly but there several teams that have not received many holding calls. I was hoping to see a much larger gap between Dallas and the other teams.
Accepted Holding calls
NE: 9
GB: 9
Det: 9
Car: 9
NO: 8
Min: 8
Ten: 8
Phl: 7
Dal: 6