Let me ask you this........you honestly think we will see the effort and motivation against the Bucs that we saw Sunday? I don't.....Nice try putting some perfume on some crap.....still smells like crap. Why do some people here keep making excuses for this team? They get enough coddling from Jerry and the FO.
So Dak playing almost the whole game and throwing 37 times means Dallas was playing to avoid injury and not win the game????NOT win.....pre-season mode. Never thought of this until my neighbor ( Eagle fan ) mentioned and it makes sense ( he made some good points ). Remember odds makers gave us only a 1% chance of getting the No. 1 seed and I think an 8% for No.2. In other words, there was almost no chance of the Giants and Cards winning. Here's the question he asked......what if both games were played at 1:00 instead 4:00 and we knew before the game they both won. How many starters do you think would have missed the game? Once it was clear during the week that the Giants were resting their starters vs Eagles A team the priority probably shifted from going all out to win vs avoiding injuries. Guess what, that's exactly the way we played....... does this make any sense.
....I agree here. I feel Dallas comes out fast. Throwing in some new wrinkles. Nothing to lose now, but go home...lol...Let me ask you this........you honestly think we will see the effort and motivation against the Bucs that we saw Sunday? I don't.....
You're the first poster to even mention Dak......why is that?So Dak playing almost the whole game and throwing 37 times means Dallas was playing to avoid injury and not win the game????
That is one of the dumbest things I ever heard considering if Dallas won and Philly lost Dallas wins the division and gets the #1 seed. If your BS theory was true why bother playing starters?????
People get dumber and dumber on here just to defend Dak's poor play.
To counter the BS theory of avoiding injury: you do not leave in your supposed franchise, $40M/year QB deep into the 4th quarter when well behind if trying to avoid injuries.You're the first poster to even mention Dak......why is that?
That’s not the question….the question should be why does a team who has accomplished nothing in terms of actual meaningful winning come out and not give it their all on the slim chance of a bye? ILet me ask you this........you honestly think we will see the effort and motivation against the Bucs that we saw Sunday? I don't.....
You don't think they knew the Giants were resting starters and the Eagles were playing their A team to win? This means we literally had no chance at winning the divisionThey prepped all week for the game having meaning and they came out flat and unprepared.
No, it doesn't make any sense. We played our starters to win the game. They Dak was awful. The WRs were not much better. The OL was bad.
Kellen Moore and MM should be embarrassed.
That’s not how nfl players think….that’s how fans think. Anything can happen in the nfl and quite frankly the giants came an onside kick away from getting the ball back and going for the go ahead score.You don't think they knew the Giants were resting starters and the Eagles were playing their A team to win? This means we literally had no chance at winning the division
If that’s the case then playing guys all day shouldn’t have happenedNOT win.....pre-season mode. Never thought of this until my neighbor ( Eagle fan ) mentioned and it makes sense ( he made some good points ). Remember odds makers gave us only a 1% chance of getting the No. 1 seed and I think an 8% for No.2. In other words, there was almost no chance of the Giants and Cards winning. Here's the question he asked......what if both games were played at 1:00 instead 4:00 and we knew before the game they both won. How many starters do you think would have missed the game? Once it was clear during the week that the Giants were resting their starters vs Eagles A team the priority probably shifted from going all out to win vs avoiding injuries. Guess what, that's exactly the way we played....... does this make any sense.
I didn’t want Micah to play myselfMission failed. Bland is hurt. Parsons looked beat up in the first Q. If you are going to play guys, they should play to win.
but why then leave starters in. pull them after one quarter. bland got injured. we should have put Joseph in instead and protect bland and diggsNOT win.....pre-season mode. Never thought of this until my neighbor ( Eagle fan ) mentioned and it makes sense ( he made some good points ). Remember odds makers gave us only a 1% chance of getting the No. 1 seed and I think an 8% for No.2. In other words, there was almost no chance of the Giants and Cards winning. Here's the question he asked......what if both games were played at 1:00 instead 4:00 and we knew before the game they both won. How many starters do you think would have missed the game? Once it was clear during the week that the Giants were resting their starters vs Eagles A team the priority probably shifted from going all out to win vs avoiding injuries. Guess what, that's exactly the way we played....... does this make any sense.
And the Commanders had what to play for in this game?NOT win.....pre-season mode. Never thought of this until my neighbor ( Eagle fan ) mentioned and it makes sense ( he made some good points ). Remember odds makers gave us only a 1% chance of getting the No. 1 seed and I think an 8% for No.2. In other words, there was almost no chance of the Giants and Cards winning. Here's the question he asked......what if both games were played at 1:00 instead 4:00 and we knew before the game they both won. How many starters do you think would have missed the game? Once it was clear during the week that the Giants were resting their starters vs Eagles A team the priority probably shifted from going all out to win vs avoiding injuries. Guess what, that's exactly the way we played....... does this make any sense.