Twitter: Super Bowl odds

[Hawkeye0202]

= #5

 

[VaqueroTD]

= #5

Everyone loves our Boys.

I agree though, swap GB and Dallas and you probably have the right odds.

Arizona is fading fast, although they get a chance to prove everyone wrong next week.

Still not sold on the Rams.

 

[ThatJerryKid]

= #5

The Packers OLine is a hot mess. There is no way they can protect Rodgers from our front 7. It’s baffling how so many people on this forum are in awe of the Packers. They’re good but certainly beatable.

 

[nightrain]

The Packers OLine is a hot mess. There is no way they can protect Rodgers from our front 7. It’s baffling how so many people on this forum are in awe of the Packers. They’re good but certainly beatable.

I think the Cowboys defense offers the best Kryptonite vs. Rodgers considering their personnel, scheme and health right now. I think the Packers are getting their All Pro LT back, but I still like the Cowboys defense matches up well up vs. the Packers and Rodgers.

 

[VaqueroTD]

I think the Cowboys defense offers the best Kryptonite vs. Rodgers considering their personnel, scheme and health right now. I think the Packers are getting their All Pro LT back, but I still like the Cowboys defense matches up well up vs. the Packers and Rodgers.

I agree. I was scared to play the Pack considering the history, and there's always fear with Rodgers who can eat teams up, but I think our defense could do some damage, especially if all their oline keeps going out.

 

[ActualCowboysFan]

The Packers OLine is a hot mess. There is no way they can protect Rodgers from our front 7. It’s baffling how so many people on this forum are in awe of the Packers. They’re good but certainly beatable.

DVOA is really down on them. Their Point Differential doesn't scream 11-3 but there they are. If Baltimore lets Huntley run, if Cinci makes a kick, if AJ Green remembers he's playing in a football game, they're 8-6.

 

[jazzcat22]

GB was just gifted a win, and have played a weak schedule. They also have their refs. So did they factor that in?

I am actually surprised we are at #3, however NE should not be #2. Not saying we should be, but NE should not be.
I would put TB there, as you can't rule out Brady.

 

[DallasEast]

New England #2. Led by a rookie quarterback. Never happened in Super Bowl history. Let's see this plays out.

 

[Hawkeye0202]

The Packers OLine is a hot mess. There is no way they can protect Rodgers from our front 7. It’s baffling how so many people on this forum are in awe of the Packers. They’re good but certainly beatable.

My concern is as of today the game would be in Green Bay. Even as good as our D is playing right now, beating Rogers in Green Bay, in January would be a major challenge. Not saying it can't be done, just a bit surprised this site would favor us.

 

[JBS]

My concern is as of today the game would be in Green Bay. Even as good as our D is playing right now, beating Rogers in Green Bay, in January would be a major challenge. Not saying it can't be done, just a bit surprised this site would favor us.

It probably projects the cowboys to have better odds at the top seed. Gb is less likely to win out than Dallas, imo.

 

[Fizziksman]

GB was just gifted a win, and have played a weak schedule. They also have their refs. So did they factor that in?

I am actually surprised we are at #3, however NE should not be #2. Not saying we should be, but NE should not be.
I would put TB there, as you can't rule out Brady.

they will always favor those who can actually make the Super Bowl and to them the only competition for the Patriots is the Chiefs who have the best odds while teams like the Cowboys and Packers and Bucs have to deal with each other or like the Rams. 4 legitimate teams.

 

[lkelly]

New England #2. Led by a rookie quarterback. Never happened in Super Bowl history. Let's see this plays out.

Agree. I think I'd fade that action and take GB in a heartbeat.

 

[BourbonBalz]

The Patriots are not winning the Super Bowl. They’re not making the Super Bowl

 

[MarcusRock]

= #5

These aren't Vegas odds. Those go somewhat like this currently.

Packers/Chiefs
Bucs
Rams
Bills
Cowboys
Arizona
Patriots

Makes me think these odds are simply to piss off Packers fans for clicks, etc. Do we know what the source is? Some "metric" they made up, perhaps?

 

[cowboyec]

they aren't wrong if we keep playing to our talent level.

 

[Sarge]

The Patriots are not winning the Super Bowl. They’re not making the Super Bowl

They may not even win their division.

 

[cowboyec]

Agree. I think I'd fade that action and take GB in a heartbeat.

i wouldnt.
green bay is 0-4 in the nfc title game...post mccarthy/rodgers super bowl win.

 

[BourbonBalz]

These aren't Vegas odds. Those go somewhat like this currently.

Packers/Chiefs
Bucs
Rams
Bills
Cowboys
Arizona
Patriots

Makes me think these odds are simply to piss off Packers fans for clicks, etc. Do we know what the source is? Some "metric" they made up, perhaps?

Bills? Just no. I know they’re talented but they have zero run game and they’ve been playing like crap. After the first 6 weeks or so I thought they were possibly the best team in the league. Now? Not close. Still talented but way too one dimensional.

 

[Established1971]

= #5

I saw a completely different list of odds on tv this morning. All these odds or percentage chances should come with explanations of what the calculations are and who decided those were the calculations.

 

[pitt33]

New England #2. Led by a rookie quarterback. Never happened in Super Bowl history. Let's see this plays out.

I don’t get all the Mac Jones love. His arm is average at best. And he can get that deer in headlights look.

I’d be really surprised if they were to get there.